China versus India, A Great Asian Race.

[HariPrasad-1]

Chinese do not consider India a challenge until after 2050 at least.

A survey was conducted in China asking their people about to whom they consider a biggest Threat? The number considering India a threat has significantly increased since last survey.

More Chinese now regard India as a security threat. Only 8% consider it favourable

The survey conducted by Tsinghua University reveals that the Chinese view Russia favourably and say US has the most impact on China’s security environment.

theprint.in

 

[Overlord]

Not to considered great when 35% of your GDP is exported. If you take the exports away then Chinese fall back into regular category like others.

Yes, yes china is collapsing, we believes you

 

[JaguarWarrior]

A survey was conducted in China asking their people about to whom they consider a biggest Threat? The number considering India a threat has significantly increased since last survey.

More Chinese now regard India as a security threat. Only 8% consider it favourable

The survey conducted by Tsinghua University reveals that the Chinese view Russia favourably and say US has the most impact on China’s security environment.

theprint.in

China and India are not confrontational. China will give Aksai Chin back to India.

 

[HariPrasad-1]

China and India are not confrontational. China will give Aksai Chin back to India.

China can not do that. It is a country with ambitions higher that its ability. India has started putting China in its place. China's cheap labor advantage gave it a great economic advantage which they translated into military capability rapidly and thought that they are next to US in terms of Military and Economy. It can even arm twist US as well. In next move, they started supporting some rogue nations like Pakistan, NK and IRAN to contain India, Israel and US. However, unfortunately for China, Narendra Modi came to power and immediately declare his act east policy. He started challenging China's Military and economic might. He destroy China's string of pearl with mere diplomacy without a significant investment into military. He started strengthening Andaman command , which will be a nightmare for China. In last G20, he proposed a new economic corridor much more inclusive and transparent which left hegemonic belt and road initiative out dated and country like Italy announced that they are no more interested in Belt and road initiative. India took the leadership of global south. All these India's initiative made it emerge as a very powerful poll in world's geopolitics. China's debt trap policy got exposed very badly. Arrogance and foolishness of dictator Xi is proving very costly for China. China's economic model of building ghost city, high speed railway and real estate sector has proved to be an economic disaster. With emergence of India as a supplier of high quality goods at a cheaper price is winning what happened to be a Chinese market till now. In Russia, US , Europe, Australia and Africa, India's foot print in terms of trade is increasing rapidly. China which dreamt of becoming a superpower seems to have regressed from the path of becoming a very powerful nation. Its capabilities seems very short of what China has dreamt for itself. Xi is a blessing for the world. China is loosing very fast in terms of economy and Xi is leading that. Xi should remain in power for atleast one decade more to ensure the downfall of rogue China. We should pray for that.

 

[Varoon2]

' Forward Policy' no justification or reason for China's attack on India in 1962:

https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/archive/nation/nehrus-forward-policy-not-to-blame-for-62-war-book-509442

 

[JaguarWarrior]

' Forward Policy' no justification or reason for China's attack on India in 1962:

https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/archive/nation/nehrus-forward-policy-not-to-blame-for-62-war-book-509442

In 1962 India and USSR were allies against China and there was real possibility of USSR deploying forces in Aksai Chin to threaten Xinjiang and Tibet. China preemptively invaded India to snatch away Aksai Chin from India.

As a Chinese, it is deeply regreable of this historical injustice. It is my hope the Aksai Chin issue will be solved with the McMahon line as the border, with China keeping about half of it and give about half of it back to India.

 

[Varoon2]

Ussr deploying forces in....but that never happened before, during or after.

 

[JaguarWarrior]

Ussr deploying forces in....but that never happened before, during or after.

In 1960 USSR became enemy of China. In 1962 USSR and India were allied against China. There was possibility.

 

[Tshering22]

In 1960 USSR became enemy of China. In 1962 USSR and India were allied against China. There was a possibility.

There is enough room for India and China to compete healthily and still manage to keep the NATO gang off Asia.

Of the 2,300 years of our bilateral relationship, only 70 years have been negative. That means there is much scope and hope for the restoration of warmth.

However, it will have to come with an understanding that neither side is out to get the other. It will have to happen in order to keep the Liberal Globalist degenerates away from Asian societies.

 

[JaguarWarrior]

There is enough room for India and China to compete healthily and still manage to keep the NATO gang off Asia.

Of the 2,300 years of our bilateral relationship, only 70 years have been negative. That means there is much scope and hope for the restoration of warmth.

However, it will have to come with an understanding that neither side is out to get the other. It will have to happen in order to keep the Liberal Globalist degenerates away from Asian societies.

China India conflict only benefits the US. The US sell weapons to both sides and make profit. Xi and Modi know the Anglos are barbarians. Having guns does not the Anglos civilized. In 1997 Chinese took Hong Kong back from the Anglos. The Anglos are still mad about it and plotting revenge.

 

[HariPrasad-1]

No, they got from US when they turned against Soviets. Their early missiles were very primitive and poor.

They got it both from US and Russia. When it was a communist country, it got the help from Russia. When it turned against Russia, they got the help from US. Today Russia sales lots of its technology to China for money.

 

[JaguarWarrior]

In 2050 when China invade Taiwan China give Aksai Chin back to India in exchange for India staying neutral. Aksai Chin is 36,000 square kilometers. Similar to Taiwan area. But there is no one living there, so it has no use to China.

 

[srevster]

In 2050 when China invade Taiwan China give Aksai Chin back to India in exchange for India staying neutral. Aksai Chin is 36,000 square kilometers. Similar to Taiwan area. But there is no one living there, so it has no use to China.

In 2050, China will not be run by the CCP and won't be bordering India.

 

[JaguarWarrior]

In 2050, China will not be run by the CCP.

CCP is popular in China. CCP has a lot of social programs. A lot of the biggest enterprises are state owned and have a lot of benefits.

 

[srevster]

CCP is popular in China. CCP has a lot of social programs. A lot of the biggest enterprises are state owned and have a lot of benefits.

LOL, CCP installed 1 child policy and worked everyone to death, now you have millions of Double Income No Kid (DINK) familes and a demographic time bomb. The social contract between CCP and it's people is prosperity in exchange for freedom. The prosperity part is now gone but the freedom part is still owned by CCP. The breaking of the social contract means the end of the CCP.

 

[srevster]

China’s ‘self-aware’ DINK couples, with no kids, weigh on demographic crisis

Many young couples in China are shunning government handouts and incentives to live a life unburdened by children, and the falling birth rate has economic implications that could span decades.

www.scmp.com

 

[assassin162]

In 2050 when China invade Taiwan China give Aksai Chin back to India in exchange for India staying neutral. Aksai Chin is 36,000 square kilometers. Similar to Taiwan area. But there is no one living there, so it has no use to China.

And let India occupy Nepal and Bhutan at the same time peacefully. Two civilizations, one north of the himalayas and another south of himalayas.
And if you do both things, then no just Taiwan go and capture whole central asia and do vasectomy of all Turks, we will support. Lol

 

[Azaad]

There is enough room for India and China to compete healthily and still manage to keep the NATO gang off Asia.

Of the 2,300 years of our bilateral relationship, only 70 years have been negative. That means there is much scope and hope for the restoration of warmth.

However, it will have to come with an understanding that neither side is out to get the other. It will have to happen in order to keep the Liberal Globalist degenerates away from Asian societies.

In the 2300 yrs of our mutual history we never shared a common border . Tibet was ALWAYS the buffer in between. Take the buffer away which happened 70 yrs ago & you see what's happened. In any case the Tibet & an un demarcated boundary were the only 2 reasons why China went to war with India.

Since then the situation has become much more complicated between the 2 , with water becoming a vital natural resources which'd increasingly be in short supply due to climate change & Beijing's various experiments to transfer water from Tibet into mainland China , China's hegemony over Asia being questioned by Japan & India most prominently among other nations , the economics of trade , leadership of the global south , etc .

Even if we didn't go to war in 1962 , relations between the 2 would be luke warm at best considering the factors listed above. Now ,after Galwan among various incidents - major & minor since 1962 including 1962 , with the Chinese revealing their hand in Galwan , it's plain inimical.

 

[assassin162]

In the 2300 yrs of our mutual history we never shared a common border . Tibet was ALWAYS the buffer in between. Take the buffer away which happened 70 yrs ago & you see what's happened. In any case the Tibet & an un demarcated boundary were the only 2 reasons why China went to war with India.

Since then the situation has become much more complicated between the 2 , with water becoming a vital natural resources which'd increasingly be in short supply due to climate change & Beijing's various experiments to transfer water from Tibet into mainland China , China's hegemony over Asia being questioned by Japan & India most prominently among other nations , the economics of trade , leadership of the global south , etc .

Even if we didn't go to war in 1962 , relations between the 2 would be luke warm at best considering the factors listed above. Now ,after Galwan among various incidents - major & minor since 1962 including 1962 , with the Chinese revealing their hand in Galwan , it's plain inimical.

I diagree over the water part. Water is there doesnt mean the same water can be utilised by us. There is no method for us to bring water of Brahmaputra water from low lying water rich north eastern plains to Indian core.
Water in itself is a resource if it can be utilised economically. We have enough water, management is the key and as we develop we will over time.

 

[Azaad]

I diagree over the water part. Water is there doesnt mean the same water can be utilised by us. There is no method for us to bring water of Brahmaputra water from low lying water rich north eastern plains to Indian core.
Water in itself is a resource if it can be utilised economically. We have enough water, management is the key and as we develop we will over time.

It's not just the Brahmaputra , the Indus Satluj & the Ghaghara also originate in Tibet. In fact even the Ganges which originates in our part of the Himalayas bordering Tibet is fed by glaciers originating & existing in Tibet.

Besides we don't need to bring the Brahmaputra to mainland India. We need to ensure along with BD , they don't divert the flow into mainland China for more than us the diversion will greatly impact BD though it'd have a severe impact on us as well.