China Military News & Updates

EnlightenedMonk

Member of The Month JULY 2009
New Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2009
Messages
3,831
Likes
28
I don't think the two editorials are incompatible. There is no "U-turn". China is not the sworn blood enemy of India. Rather, there are serious territorial disputes between the two countries. If those are resolved to our satisfaction, there can be thousands of years of peace.
I beg to differ... these disputes are just minor issues... if we both sit down on the negotiating table, I'm sure they can be ironed out in no time...
 

EnlightenedMonk

Member of The Month JULY 2009
New Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2009
Messages
3,831
Likes
28
It could also be the good cop-bad cop technique being used here...
 

Fighter

New Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2009
Messages
304
Likes
0
I don't think the two editorials are incompatible. There is no "U-turn". China is not the sworn blood enemy of India. Rather, there are serious territorial disputes between the two countries. If those are resolved to our satisfaction, there can be thousands of years of peace.
Who are chinas biggest enemies
 

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
New Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,330
Likes
11,874
Country flag
Sammy,
f those are resolved to our satisfaction,
Our satisfaction? That's where the problem is. It's not going to be according to your satisfaction.
 

EnlightenedMonk

Member of The Month JULY 2009
New Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2009
Messages
3,831
Likes
28
Sammy,


Our satisfaction? That's where the problem is. It's not going to be according to your satisfaction.
I think he means mutual satisfaction... he said "our" so I thought he meant both India and China... or did he ??? :D:D:D:D You got me thinking now... :D
 

Koji

New Member
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
758
Likes
1
Nah China just now had realized that all their neigbours are really strong and they cannot stand together if attacked. And we are also far more experienced in combatting Islamic insurgency than anyone else. They also dont have a research and development base which we have.
Research development base? You have to be kidding
 

EnlightenedMonk

Member of The Month JULY 2009
New Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2009
Messages
3,831
Likes
28
And these nations are?
1 Afghanistan
2 Akrotiri
3 Albania
4 Algeria
5 American Samoa
6 Andorra
7 Angola
8 Anguilla
9 Antarctica
10 Antigua and Barbuda
11 Argentina
12 Armenia
13 Aruba
14 Ashmore and Cartier Islands
15 Australia
16 Austria
17 Azerbaijan
18 Bahamas, The
19 Bahrain
20 Bangladesh
21 Barbados
22 Bassas da India
23 Belarus
24 Belgium
25 Belize
26 Benin
27 Bermuda
28 Bhutan
29 Bolivia
30 Bosnia and Herzegovina
31 Botswana
32 Bouvet Island
33 Brazil
34 British Indian Ocean Territory
35 British Virgin Islands
36 Brunei
37 Bulgaria
38 Burkina Faso
39 Burma
40 Burundi
41 Cambodia
42 Cameroon
43 Canada
44 Cape Verde
45 Cayman Islands
46 Central African Republic
47 Chad
48 Chile
49 China
50 Christmas Island
51 Clipperton Island
52 Cocos (Keeling) Islands
53 Colombia
54 Comoros
55 Congo, Democratic Republic of the
56 Congo, Republic of the
57 Cook Islands
58 Coral Sea Islands
59 Costa Rica
60 Cote d'Ivoire
61 Croatia
62 Cuba
63 Cyprus
64 Czech Republic
65 Denmark
66 Dhekelia
67 Djibouti
68 Dominica
69 Dominican Republic
70 Ecuador
71 Egypt
72 El Salvador
73 Equatorial Guinea
74 Eritrea
75 Estonia
76 Ethiopia
77 Europa Island
78 Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas)
79 Faroe Islands
80 Fiji
81 Finland
82 France
83 French Guiana
84 French Polynesia
85 French Southern and Antarctic Lands
86 Gabon
87 Gambia, The
88 Gaza Strip
89 Georgia
90 Germany
91 Ghana
92 Gibraltar
93 Glorioso Islands
94 Greece
95 Greenland
96 Grenada
97 Guadeloupe
98 Guam
99 Guatemala
100 Guernsey
101 Guinea
102 Guinea-Bissau
103 Guyana
104 Haiti
105 Heard Island and McDonald Islands
106 Holy See (Vatican City)
107 Honduras
108 Hong Kong
109 Hungary
110 Iceland
111 India
112 Indonesia
113 Iran
114 Iraq
115 Ireland
116 Isle of Man
117 Israel
118 Italy
119 Jamaica
120 Jan Mayen
121 Japan
122 Jersey
123 Jordan
124 Juan de Nova Island
125 Kazakhstan
126 Kenya
127 Kiribati
128 Korea, North
129 Korea, South
130 Kuwait
131 Kyrgyzstan
132 Laos
133 Latvia
134 Lebanon
135 Lesotho
136 Liberia
137 Libya
138 Liechtenstein
139 Lithuania
140 Luxembourg
141 Macau
142 Macedonia
143 Madagascar
144 Malawi
145 Malaysia
146 Maldives
147 Mali
148 Malta
149 Marshall Islands
150 Martinique
151 Mauritania
152 Mauritius
153 Mayotte
154 Mexico
155 Micronesia, Federated States of
156 Moldova
157 Monaco
158 Mongolia
159 Montserrat
160 Morocco
161 Mozambique
162 Namibia
163 Nauru
164 Navassa Island
165 Nepal
166 Netherlands
167 Netherlands Antilles
168 New Caledonia
169 New Zealand
170 Nicaragua
171 Niger
172 Nigeria
173 Niue
174 Norfolk Island
175 Northern Mariana Islands
176 Norway
177 Oman
178 Pakistan
179 Palau
180 Panama
181 Papua New Guinea
182 Paracel Islands
183 Paraguay
184 Peru
185 Philippines
186 Pitcairn Islands
187 Poland
188 Portugal
189 Puerto Rico
190 Qatar
191 Reunion
192 Romania
193 Russia
194 Rwanda
195 Saint Helena
196 Saint Kitts and Nevis
197 Saint Lucia
198 Saint Pierre and Miquelon
199 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
200 Samoa
201 San Marino
202 Sao Tome and Principe
203 Saudi Arabia
204 Senegal
205 Serbia and Montenegro
206 Seychelles
207 Sierra Leone
208 Singapore
209 Slovakia
210 Slovenia
211 Solomon Islands
212 Somalia
213 South Africa
214 South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands
215 Spain
216 Spratly Islands
217 Sri Lanka
218 Sudan
219 Suriname
220 Svalbard
221 Swaziland
222 Sweden
223 Switzerland
224 Syria
225 Taiwan
226 Tajikistan
227 Tanzania
228 Thailand
229 Timor-Leste
230 Togo
231 Tokelau
232 Tonga
233 Trinidad and Tobago
234 Tromelin Island
235 Tunisia
236 Turkey
237 Turkmenistan
238 Turks and Caicos Islands
239 Tuvalu
240 Uganda
241 Ukraine
242 United Arab Emirates
243 United Kingdom
244 United States
245 Uruguay
246 Uzbekistan
247 Vanuatu
248 Venezuela
249 Vietnam
250 Virgin Islands
251 Wake Island
252 Wallis and Futuna
253 West Bank
254 Western Sahara
255 Yemen
256 Zambia
257 Zimbabwe

:D:D:D:D:D
 

Fighter

New Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2009
Messages
304
Likes
0
EnlightenedMonk something wrong with your list.
You included china. :)
 

EnlightenedMonk

Member of The Month JULY 2009
New Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2009
Messages
3,831
Likes
28
EnlightenedMonk something wrong with your list.
You included china. :)
Of course, they're also against themselves... don't you know about the Uighur problem a few weeks ago, and the Tibetan one before that ??? :D:D:D:D:D
 

Flint

New Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
1,626
Likes
174
^They already have Aksai Chin. Its a barren hellhole, but fantastic from a tactical standpoint.
 

mattster

Respected Member
New Member
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
1,171
Likes
870
Country flag
I don't think the two editorials are incompatible. There is no "U-turn". China is not the sworn blood enemy of India. Rather, there are serious territorial disputes between the two countries. If those are resolved to our satisfaction, there can be thousands of years of peace.


Sammy, dont insult the intelligence of the readers of this forum. The China-India thing is all about China becoming strategically dominant in Asia. They do not want anyone to be a close 2nd. For 50 years China has engaged in an indirect proxy war with India thru their ally Pakistan.

Pakistan's entire relationship with China is primarily based on their ability to cause havoc within India. Otherwise, these 2 countries have squat in common.
China is no friend of India....it does not matter what the Chinese press says....its all govt BS anyway. Any Indian who believes that China is really interested in having good relations with India should have their head examined. The Chinese will sign all kinds of treaties with other countries and then wipe their asses with the same paper it was written on.

The only thing that China respects is POWER. Only when India has the military and economic power will we see that a balanced relationship.
 

proud_indian

New Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2009
Messages
501
Likes
1,344
Country flag
if they both solve the border issue. I must say this will be the brightest day in the history of india after independence.

And on this u turn i have to say "dosti hamesha barabar walo me hoti hai" and china is realising this slowly

U can never beg respect u have to fetch it
 

Daredevil

On Vacation!
New Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
11,615
Likes
5,775
Most people don't realize that the Indo-China relations is not contingent upon border issue alone. Border row is just one of the many pressure points used by China to relegate India to second position in its quest for being sole super power of Asia for now and world super power in the long-term.

Below are some of the things that China is working against India.

*Support to Pakistan in terms of gifting nukes, missiles through its proxy NoKo, protecting it in international fora etc etc.
*String of Pearls to encircle India strategically.
*Diversion of rivers flowing into India.
*Sabotaging aspirations of India at international stage, be it Nuclear deal, UNSC seat etc
*Strategic and forceful ingression into the Indian ocean which is backyard of Indian Navy.
 

1.44

Member of The Month SEPTEMBER 2009
New Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2009
Messages
4,359
Likes
56
Think Tank: China Beats U.S. in Simulated Taiwan Air War

Think Tank: China Beats U.S. in Simulated Taiwan Air War

In 2000, the influential think thank RAND Corporation crunched some numbers regarding a possible Chinese invasion of Taiwan, and concluded that “any near-term Chinese attempt to invade Taiwan would likely be a very bloody affair with a significant probability of failure” — especially if the U.S. raced to the island nation’s defense. But nine years later, a new, much-updated edition of the RAND study found that China’s improved air and missile forces “represent clear and impending dangers to the defense of Taiwan,” whether or not the U.S. is involved.

“A credible case can be made that the air war for Taiwan could essentially be over before much of the Blue [American and allied] air force has even fired a shot,” the monograph notes.

It’s a potentially controversial assertion — and one that might have fueled the (now-resolved) debate over whether the U.S. Air Force should buy more F-22s. RAND found that F-22s flying from the relative safety of Guam could be surprisingly effective in blunting a Chinese air assault.

Still, with or without F-22s, the Chinese air and missile force “dramatically outnumbers [U.S. and Taiwanese] forces and wins the war of attrition,” according to Steve Trimble’s summary of the RAND study. The Chinese lose 241 jets on the first day of fighting, while the U.S. and Taiwan together lose 147, but this lopsided kill ratio doesn’t matter, when China has hundreds more planes to put into the air. Moreover, most of the U.S. and Taiwanese planes lost, are destroyed on the ground by barrages of Chinese ballistic missiles. (It’s not for no reason that the U.S. Air Force is working hard to win new friends, each with juicy new bases, all over the Pacific.)

Before you panic, though, consider the many caveats RAND sneaks into the study — especially in the footnotes.

In light of how close the Chinese and Taiwanese economies have grown in the last decade, a Chinese invasion would amount to Beijing “shooting itself in the foot.” “China’s IT sector, in particular, could be devastated.” Never mind that the U.S. and Chinese economies are also irrevocably interdependent.

What’s more, despite focusing on the air battle for most of the report’s 185 pages, RAND admits that dogfighting can’t conquer an island. “Ultimately, there is only one military course of action that guarantees China control of Taiwan: a successful invasion and occupation.” An amphibious assault across the 200-mile-wide Taiwan Strait would represent “by far the most challenging military operation ever undertaken” by the Chinese. The entire Chinese navy could only carry 31,000 troops in the first wave — a number RAND admits would “almost certainly not” suffice, “assuming that Taiwan’s government, military, and populace chose to put up a fight.” It would take just one successful attack by Taiwan’s missile boats, or one day’s sorties by the island’s attack choppers, to incapacitate the whole Chinese assault fleet.

For that matter, RAND admits that successful attacks by just four U.S. B-1B bombers could also disable the invasion fleet. But let’s assume China does sweep the sky of U.S. and Taiwanese planes, bombers included — and even manages to take out Taiwan’s missile boats and choppers. The RAND study glosses over, in a single footnote, the force that would really play the biggest role in halting a Chinese invasion: the U.S. Navy’s huge, lethal fleet of nuclear submarines.

Think Tank: China Beats U.S. in Simulated Taiwan Air War | Danger Room | Wired.com
 

Articles

Top