China Economy: News & Discussion

cir

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
1,996
Likes
269
Weichao Power's parent co may acquire EU's largest yacht maker

China Knowledge quoted two persons familiar with the matter said Shandong Heavy Industry Group Co, parent company of Weichai Power Co Ltd one of China largest manufacturers of diesel engines is looking at the possibility upon acquisition of Ferretti SpA, Europe largest luxury-yacht maker.

The two persons noted that the lenders of Ferretti have agreed to cut debts from EUR 685 million to EUR 116 million after they receive EUR 180 million of additional funding.

Shandong Heavy Industry would take control of the yacht maker, while lenders led by Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc, Strategic Value Partners LLC and Oaktree Capital Management LP would have rights to subscribe for 25% equity injection worth EUR 100 million which has been underwritten by RBS and SVP. The revolving loan worth EUR 80 million will be provided as well.

A spokesperson for Forli, Italy-based Ferretti which was hit hard by the global economic crisis declined to comment.

Mr Salvatore Basile CEO of Ferretti visited Weichai Power in November 2010 about the asset sale.

(Sourced from China Knowledge)

http://origin-www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=conewsstory&tkr=WI4:GR&sid=aF5ij5knXKls

Steel Guru : Weichao Power parent co may acquire EU largest yacht maker - 241365 - 2011-12-17


Weichai Power is also in talks to acquire 140-year old engine maker DEUTZ AG of Germany。
 
Last edited:

cir

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
1,996
Likes
269
China buys copper stake, Moly mine shelved
by: Ross Kelly
Dow Jones Newswires December 29, 2011 4:32PM

A CHINESE miner agreed to buy into a once-abandoned copper mine today as development of a molybdenum project by a different company was shelved, highlighting the mixed outlook for commodities.

China's Guangdong Guangxin Holding has agreed to buy stakes in small miner KBL Mining and one of its copper projects in NSW for at least $87 million.

Guangdong Guangxin will get 25 per cent of the recently reinstated Mineral Hill project, which is prospective for copper, gold, silver, lead and zinc, for $80 million and will buy KBL's 75 per cent share of copper concentrates - but at a 25 per cent discount to prevailing prices on the London Metals Exchange.

The Chinese company will also take a 15 per cent stake in KBL through the issue of KBL shares at a 25 per cent premium to the six-month volume weighted average price of its shares.

KBL shares jumped 20 per cent to 27.5c on news of the deal.

"There is still substantial interest in Australian resources," executive chairman Jim Wall said.

"To date, the market is seeing most of that interest focus on coal and iron ore, but copper's also top of the list," he said. "It's obviously a very important future commodity requirement for China and India."

Separately, Moly Mines said it would not proceed with the Spinifex Ridge molybdenum mine in the Pilbara at this stage, citing weakness in prices of the metal and the strength of the dollar.

The company needed to make an investment decision on building the mine by May, but said it didn't expect the headwinds facing the project to disappear by then.

On a more positive note, Moly said it has agreed a non-binding deal for a strategic alliance with China Development Bank on funding for new mining projects.

Molybdenum provides strength and corrosion resistance in stainless steels.

Investment bank Macquarie expects copper prices in calendar 2012 to rise 3 per cent before tailing off 4 per cent in 2013 and falling another 26 per cent in 2014 as more supply comes on line.

It expects molybdenum to rise 6 per cent in 2012 and 4 per cent in 2013 before tailing off in 2014.

Cookies must be enabled | The Australian
 

cir

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
1,996
Likes
269
Dec 29, 2011 1:10 am

China Racing to Expand Data Center Capacity

By Michael Kan and James Niccolai, IDG News

China is in the midst of an unprecedented data center construction boom that's providing business opportunities for U.S. companies and could see China emerge with one of the most advanced computing infrastructures in the world.

The country is building dozens, maybe hundreds of large data centers to support the needs of its fast-growing online population, estimated now at close to 500 million. The data centers will help to meet escalating demand from telecom providers, and for services such as e-commerce, online banking and e-government.

They will also provide computing infrastructure for overseas firms looking to expand in China. But the uncertain political and regulatory environment make it unlikely that China can turn itself into a hub for international business in the region, to rival countries such as Hong Kong and Singapore.

The build-out is strongly backed by the Chinese government, which has made expanding the national computing infrastructure a part of its latest five-year plan. And local governments are funding the development of vast "cloud cities" -- industrial zones that aim to provide the foundations to support as many as 20 data centers over time.

The boom is providing opportunities for outside firms such as Hewlett-Packard and IBM. "We have more people in China focused on data center development and strategy than, I believe, in any country in the world," said Rick Einhorn, worldwide director for HP's Critical Facilities Services group.

China is heavily reliant today on outside firms for design expertise, he said, although that could change as HP and other firms work alongside Chinese engineers and provide them with training and experience.

The nation's approach to data centers is "to build more and to build big," said Glen Yuan, executive of data center services for IBM's Greater China group. The facilities being built for banks and telecom providers are sometimes vast, covering up to 50,000 square meters (538,000 square feet).

China has seen waves of data center construction in the past, but those efforts were often hasty and suffered from poor planning, Einhorn and Yuan both said. Some data centers quickly exhausted their capacity, with the poor infrastructure making services in the country unreliable. This time around, China hopes to do it right.

The Suzhou International Science-Park Data Center (SISDC), in southeastern China, for example, is the country's first Tier 4-certified data center, according to Ivan Lau, a senior sales director with SISDC. Tier 4 signifies the highest level of reliability.

Built with help from IBM, an initial phase opened for business in October 2010, and the data center will cover 42,000 square meters when a second phase is completed in 2013 or 2014. The Suzhou government is funding construction, with hopes of making the industrial park where it is based a major hub for IT services.

About 80 percent of the existing capacity is in use or reserved by customers, Lau said. Many of its biggest customers are foreign financial firms, which are required by Chinese law to store data about its citizens within the country.

Government directives on carbon emissions mean data centers are being built using modern, energy-efficient technologies, Einhorn said. Some employ modular, multi-tier designs, which help to match power and cooling equipment to the requirements, in turn reducing wasted energy.

But while data centers are booming for domestic use, some are skeptical that companies will pick China as a base for providing IT services internationally. "There are questions around ownership rights for data and other assets," said IDC analyst Michelle Bailey. "It will be interesting to see if China can evolve its policies to keep in step with the market."

A former security consultant who worked on data center projects in China said foreign companies have several causes for concern. He sees three main areas of risk -- local employees absconding with data, traffic being monitored or interfered with, and the loss of equipment during sudden "inspections" by Chinese police.

"The last of these is what sets China apart from most other geographic options," and can result in the government cutting off access to equipment for several days, said the consultant, who asked not to be identified. Trying to get outside firms to host their IT infrastructure in China is "an exercise in futility," he said.

Lau said those fears are unfounded and may have been fuelled by Google's much-publicized problems in the country. As long as companies follow China's rules and regulations, they will face no problems locating data centers in China, he said.

There are other challenges too, however, such as securing adequate bandwidth and power. And China needs to keep pace with a population that is adopting PCs, smartphones and tablets at a rapid pace, said Sheldon He, a product marketing manager with Intel.

The client-to-server ratio in China is currently more than 60 to 1, he said, while in the U.S. it is closer to 20 to 1.

"China has almost five times the population of the U.S., so our problems are five times greater," He said. "We have the world's biggest billing systems. If we can succeed in solving these problems it could lead to innovation."

China Racing to Expand Data Center Capacity | PCWorld Business Center
 

nitesh

Mob Control Manager
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
7,550
Likes
1,308
Abandoning GDP fixation|Comment and Document|chinadaily.com.cn

The economic work conference transmitted a significant and unambiguous message that focus will be real economy

Many market observers have said the just-concluded Central Economic Work Conference of the Chinese government placed particular importance on "sound" or "steady" macroeconomic, fiscal and monetary policies in the year ahead.:laugh:

However, to my mind, the annual top economic conference also transmitted an unambiguous message to the outside world that the country is poised to make some significant economic policy changes.

To promote these policy changes, China will first abandon GDP-dominated performance as the guideline for its economic development.:shocked: As early as October 2007, in his report delivered to the 17th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, President Hu Jintao vowed to reduce the country's dependence on GDP, saying economic development should aim to improve people's livelihoods and welfare rather than purely push for GDP growth. :lol:

However, the country's efforts in this regard were interrupted by the economic stimulus packages it launched amid concerns over an economic slowdown, following the financial crisis in the United States in the latter half of 2008 and the following global economic recession. The side effects of the policy interruption are expected to unfold and to be mended in the years ahead.

Fortunately, the Chinese government did not cling to the GDP-preoccupied economic development approach this time, even though the country still faces the risk of an economic downturn in the context of global economic uncertainties. Despite being encircled by a treacherous external economic environment, the country has shown more determination than ever to shy away from any enormous economic stimulus packages in an endeavor to decelerate its fast pace of GDP growth, as indicated by the circular issued after this year's Central Economic Work Conference. Such a departure from the GDP preoccupation has also been reflected in some open remarks made by the country's top leaders.

The country is also expected to become firmer in extricating itself from its long dependence on currency over-issuance in the next year. For many years, some in China have regarded the virtual economy, or the financial economy, as being the same as the real economy, believing that a fast-growing GDP or the increased wealth on paper - which has proved to be mainly based on credit over-expansion - means fast development of the country's economy. Dominated by such an ideology, the country has shown a serious dependence on currency growth in recent years. Statistics indicate that China's newly increased credit volumes now amount to 8 trillion yuan ($1.26 trillion) every year, eight-fold the average 1 trillion yuan from 1998 to 2002. However, the country's newly increased GDP value has increased less than four times during the same period. Compared with the growth of its real economy, China's monetary supply has witnessed a twisted growth over the past years. For example, the country's bank assets have increased to 110 trillion yuan over the past 10 years, an eight-fold increase that was equal to 2.5 times the GDP in 2010. Such a high ratio between the two indexes has rarely been seen anywhere else. The lion's share of this flood of fluidity has gone to the property market and virtual economy rather than the country's real economy, such as agriculture and small and medium-sized enterprises.

Promising a prudent monetary policy in the year ahead, the country is expected to funnel more monetary supplies into the real economy, such as the construction of irrigation facilities and other infrastructure instead of the real estate sector. This will be a key way to prevent the speculation-prone housing market from continuing to hijack the world's second largest economy. On the contrary, the country is expected to remain unwavering in pressing ahead with ongoing regulations of its realty market to ensure that the still unendurably high property prices return to a reasonable level to meet the demand for accommodation.

This overdue and much-needed emphasis on the real economy will dominate the country's economic policy changes in the year ahead and will also decide domestic industrial adjustments over a longer period.

Such a policy shift from an excessive focus on the financial markets to the real economy is also an indication that China's policymakers have embraced the idea that the financial market can only serve as an auxiliary means to aid the country's real economy.

The author is a researcher with the Institute of Finance and Banking under the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

(China Daily 12/29/2011 page8)
 

asianobserve

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
May 5, 2011
Messages
12,846
Likes
8,556
Country flag
China spent 2011 worrying about others' debt problems. In 2012 it will face one of its own
Nov 17th 2011
China: Keynes v Hayek in China | The Economist


It took over 20 years for John Maynard Keynes's "General Theory" to be translated into Chinese. That was still a bit too soon for some of its readers. Published in 1957, around the time of Mao Zedong's "anti-rightist" campaign, Keynes's theory was denounced as "anti-science and anti-people". He was accused of the unforgivable sin of seeking to "defend capitalism".

Over five decades later, things are different. The present leadership of the Chinese Communist Party, Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao, have embraced Keynesian prescriptions with great determination. In response to the financial crisis of 2008 they approved an audacious stimulus package, unbalancing the government's books and spurring the country's banks to lend. That helped defend their peculiar brand of capitalism from a crushing slowdown.

Something similar may be required in 2012 if America's stagnation and Europe's debt crisis once again threaten the global economy. But the new leadership of Xi Jinping and Li Keqiang (expected to take over towards the end of the year) is unlikely to embrace Keynes as wholeheartedly as their predecessors. Indeed, they may find themselves slave to the scribblings of a different dead economist, Keynes's intellectual foe, Friedrich Hayek.

Whereas Keynes worried about inadequate investment—too little entrepreneurial spending to keep everyone gainfully employed—Hayek worried about bad investment. If credit were too easy, he argued, entrepreneurs would embark on overambitious projects that take too long to reach fruition and make insupportable claims on society's resources.

It is not hard to find overambitious projects in China: think of the country's "ghost cities", such as Ordos in Inner Mongolia, which is being built by government fiat long before people are ready to live in it. But although China invests at a formidable pace, it also saves at a prodigious rate. In such a thrifty economy, interest rates should be low, credit should be readily available and investment should be high.

Yet in 2009 and 2010 things went too far. Spurred on by the government, China's banks increased their lending by almost 9.6 trillion yuan ($1.5 trillion) in 2009. That is roughly twice the size of the Indian banking system, as Bank Credit Analyst, a research company, has pointed out. In other words, China's lenders added two Indias to their loanbooks in the space of a year.

Much of this lending flowed to some 10,000 investment companies sponsored by local governments, which cannot borrow directly in their own name. These companies set about building roads, bridges, irrigation works and some housing schemes of dubious merit. These loans added about 5 trillion yuan to the debt of local governments, which now amount to 10 trillion-14 trillion yuan or 25-36% of GDP (see chart).

China's authorities now admit what was always obvious: many of these projects will fail to raise enough revenue to repay their creditors. Defaults have already surfaced in Yunnan province and elsewhere. Some of these projects will be abandoned halfway. They are what Hayek would call "malinvestments", investments in capacity that no one is willing to pay for or wait for.

Hayek's students dubbed their Austrian-born professor "Mr Fluctooations" because of his preoccupation with the ups and downs of the business cycle, which he described in heavily accented English. He believed that boom-time malinvestments were responsible for the subsequent bust, much as binge-drinking is responsible for the next morning's hangover.

The road to nowhere?

This sequence seems intuitive, but it is in fact something of a puzzle. In a caustic critique of the "hangover" theory of recessions, Paul Krugman, who won the Nobel prize for economics 34 years after Hayek, complained that "nobody has managed to explain why bad investments in the past require the unemployment of good workers in the present." If an economy has squandered capital on misguided ventures, leaving its people worse off than they thought, why should so many of them stand idle? Surely people should work more, not less, in response to such bad news.

Hayekians argue that after bad investments are exposed, it takes time for economies to reorganise themselves. Loan losses may undermine confidence in the banks that incur them, hampering their ability to finance fresh investments. And when workers are laid off, it may take a while for them to find new employers or acquire the skills that alternative jobs demand.

Hayek believed that governments can do little to ease the pain of economic restructuring. Even if he is right, which is hotly disputed, politicians refuse to believe him. China's policymakers will prove no exception. The central government will step in, helping the banks and their borrowers to shoulder their debt burdens.

How it intervenes is still an open question. It may use public revenues to complete some infrastructure projects, rather than allowing bridges to fall short of the opposite bank or roads to stop short of towns. It may force banks to write off other loans, recapitalising any lenders that cannot withstand the losses. These bail-outs may take place in the open, or they may happen behind closed doors, through regulatory indulgence and implicit subsidies.

One Chinese scholar recently argued that Hayek was better known in China than in the West. But China's policymakers, just like their Western counterparts, will find Hayek's diagnosis of fluctooations more compelling than his prescription.



Simon Cox: Asia economics editor, The Economist
 

tony4562

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
836
Likes
49
China spent 2011 worrying about others' debt problems. In 2012 it will face one of its own
Nov 17th 2011
China: Keynes v Hayek in China | The Economist


It took over 20 years for John Maynard Keynes's "General Theory" to be translated into Chinese. That was still a bit too soon for some of its readers. Published in 1957, around the time of Mao Zedong's "anti-rightist" campaign, Keynes's theory was denounced as "anti-science and anti-people". He was accused of the unforgivable sin of seeking to "defend capitalism".

Over five decades later, things are different. The present leadership of the Chinese Communist Party, Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao, have embraced Keynesian prescriptions with great determination. In response to the financial crisis of 2008 they approved an audacious stimulus package, unbalancing the government's books and spurring the country's banks to lend. That helped defend their peculiar brand of capitalism from a crushing slowdown.

Something similar may be required in 2012 if America's stagnation and Europe's debt crisis once again threaten the global economy. But the new leadership of Xi Jinping and Li Keqiang (expected to take over towards the end of the year) is unlikely to embrace Keynes as wholeheartedly as their predecessors. Indeed, they may find themselves slave to the scribblings of a different dead economist, Keynes's intellectual foe, Friedrich Hayek.

Whereas Keynes worried about inadequate investment—too little entrepreneurial spending to keep everyone gainfully employed—Hayek worried about bad investment. If credit were too easy, he argued, entrepreneurs would embark on overambitious projects that take too long to reach fruition and make insupportable claims on society's resources.

It is not hard to find overambitious projects in China: think of the country's "ghost cities", such as Ordos in Inner Mongolia, which is being built by government fiat long before people are ready to live in it. But although China invests at a formidable pace, it also saves at a prodigious rate. In such a thrifty economy, interest rates should be low, credit should be readily available and investment should be high.

Yet in 2009 and 2010 things went too far. Spurred on by the government, China's banks increased their lending by almost 9.6 trillion yuan ($1.5 trillion) in 2009. That is roughly twice the size of the Indian banking system, as Bank Credit Analyst, a research company, has pointed out. In other words, China's lenders added two Indias to their loanbooks in the space of a year.

Much of this lending flowed to some 10,000 investment companies sponsored by local governments, which cannot borrow directly in their own name. These companies set about building roads, bridges, irrigation works and some housing schemes of dubious merit. These loans added about 5 trillion yuan to the debt of local governments, which now amount to 10 trillion-14 trillion yuan or 25-36% of GDP (see chart).

China's authorities now admit what was always obvious: many of these projects will fail to raise enough revenue to repay their creditors. Defaults have already surfaced in Yunnan province and elsewhere. Some of these projects will be abandoned halfway. They are what Hayek would call "malinvestments", investments in capacity that no one is willing to pay for or wait for.

Hayek's students dubbed their Austrian-born professor "Mr Fluctooations" because of his preoccupation with the ups and downs of the business cycle, which he described in heavily accented English. He believed that boom-time malinvestments were responsible for the subsequent bust, much as binge-drinking is responsible for the next morning's hangover.

The road to nowhere?

This sequence seems intuitive, but it is in fact something of a puzzle. In a caustic critique of the "hangover" theory of recessions, Paul Krugman, who won the Nobel prize for economics 34 years after Hayek, complained that "nobody has managed to explain why bad investments in the past require the unemployment of good workers in the present." If an economy has squandered capital on misguided ventures, leaving its people worse off than they thought, why should so many of them stand idle? Surely people should work more, not less, in response to such bad news.

Hayekians argue that after bad investments are exposed, it takes time for economies to reorganise themselves. Loan losses may undermine confidence in the banks that incur them, hampering their ability to finance fresh investments. And when workers are laid off, it may take a while for them to find new employers or acquire the skills that alternative jobs demand.

Hayek believed that governments can do little to ease the pain of economic restructuring. Even if he is right, which is hotly disputed, politicians refuse to believe him. China's policymakers will prove no exception. The central government will step in, helping the banks and their borrowers to shoulder their debt burdens.

How it intervenes is still an open question. It may use public revenues to complete some infrastructure projects, rather than allowing bridges to fall short of the opposite bank or roads to stop short of towns. It may force banks to write off other loans, recapitalising any lenders that cannot withstand the losses. These bail-outs may take place in the open, or they may happen behind closed doors, through regulatory indulgence and implicit subsidies.

One Chinese scholar recently argued that Hayek was better known in China than in the West. But China's policymakers, just like their Western counterparts, will find Hayek's diagnosis of fluctooations more compelling than his prescription.



Simon Cox: Asia economics editor, The Economist

You are beating a dead horse. As has been mentioned countless times already, China's debt is entirely internal, thus any debt problem can be alleviated by printing more money. Since Yuan is still like 40% undervalued despite of haveing gained some 30% in value over the last decade or so, printing more money will not cause too much problem. You have to realize that China is sitting on a huge foreign reserve of 3 trillion US dollars, is home to some of world's largest and most profitable banks, and on top of that the chinese governement own every inch of land in China.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
You are beating a dead horse. As has been mentioned countless times already, China's debt is entirely internal, thus any debt problem can be alleviated by printing more money. Since Yuan is still like 40% undervalued despite of haveing gained some 30% in value over the last decade or so, printing more money will not cause too much problem. You have to realize that China is sitting on a huge foreign reserve of 3 trillion US dollars, is home to some of world's largest and most profitable banks, and on top of that the chinese governement own every inch of land in China.
It all leads to inflation and as it is there is unrest amongst the have and have nots.

Sitting on forex alone does not solve the domestic problem. As one understands the forex is basically to make inroads into foreign economies and buy goods that are required urgently to reverse engineer and market a cheaper version to beat the international market.
 

redragon

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
956
Likes
58
Country flag
It all leads to inflation and as it is there is unrest amongst the have and have nots.

Sitting on forex alone does not solve the domestic problem. As one understands the forex is basically to make inroads into foreign economies and buy goods that are required urgently to reverse engineer and market a cheaper version to beat the international market.
Only the inflation level is way lower than that of India
 

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
China's factories falter, pro-growth policies eyed - Yahoo! News

BEIJING (Reuters) - China's factory activity shrank again December as demand at home and abroad slackened, a purchasing managers' survey showed on Friday, reinforcing the case for pro-growth policies to underpin the world's second-largest economy.

The People's Bank of China is widely expected to lower its requirement for the amount of cash banks must hold as reserves to let lenders inject more credit into the economy to fight headwinds from Europe's debt crisis and sluggish U.S. demand.
 

cir

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
1,996
Likes
269
China Manufacturing Index Rises Even Amid Threats to Growth

December 31, 2011, 10:37 PM EST

By Bloomberg News


(Updates with economist's comment in fourth paragraph.)

Jan. 1 (Bloomberg) -- A Chinese manufacturing gauge rose by more than economists expected, suggesting that a slowdown in the world's second-biggest economy may be stabilizing.

The purchasing managers' index was 50.3 in December from 49 in November, according to a statement today from the statistics bureau and China's logistics federation. The reading exceeded all forecasts in a Bloomberg News survey of 15 economists where the median estimate was 49.1.

President Hu Jintao said yesterday in his New Year address that China aims for steady and "relatively fast" growth in 2012 amid an increasingly unstable global recovery. Europe's sovereign-debt crisis and a crackdown on speculation in the housing market may limit the expansion and officials are also grappling with banks' bad-loan risks after a record expansion of credit in 2009 and 2010.

"Growth momentum will continue to wane this quarter, as the European crisis will hurt China's exports and a cooling property market will drag down domestic demand," said Zhang Zhiwei, a Hong Kong-based economist at Nomura Holdings Inc. who has previously worked for the International Monetary Fund. "The rebound does not signal that the economy has turned around.'"

The "festival effects" of upcoming western and Chinese New Year celebrations helped to boost the gauge, today's statement said. A separate index released by HSBC Holdings Plc and Markit Economics on Dec. 30 indicated that manufacturing contracted for a second month. The studies have different sample sizes and methodologies.

Reserve Requirements

The central bank may cut banks' reserve requirements as demand for cash increases ahead of a weeklong Chinese New Year holiday starting Jan. 23 and the government tilts its focus toward sustaining growth. Standard Chartered Bank said Dec. 30 that a reduction could come before financial markets reopen on Jan. 4.

The Shanghai Composite Index tumbled 22 percent last year, the most since 2008, on concern that monetary tightening and a crackdown on speculation in the housing market will derail growth. The index's 33 percent drop since 2009 makes it the worst performer among the world's 15 biggest markets.

Over the year, shares of Jiangxi Copper Co., China's biggest producer of the metal, slid 51 percent.

Bank of America Merrill Lynch estimates that the Chinese economy grew 8.7 percent in the three months through December from a year earlier, the slowest pace since the second quarter of 2009.

'Big Slowdown'

In today's statement, the logistics federation said the economy's slowdown is stabilizing even as growth momentum remains "relatively weak." A gauge of export orders rose, while remaining below 50, the dividing line between contraction and expansion. An output index jumped to 53.4 from 50.9 in November.

December's rebound shows that China "won't see a big slowdown in 2012," Zhang Liqun, a senior researcher at the Development Research Center of the State Council, said in the statement. In November, the gauge had pointed to the first contraction in manufacturing since February 2009.

Nomura estimates that China's economy, the biggest contributor to global growth, will expand 7.9 percent in 2012, the least in 13 years. Inflation is moderating after reaching a three-year high of 6.5 percent in July.

"The urgency of containing inflation isn't as high as that in the beginning of 2011," Zhou Xiaochuan, the governor of the central bank, was cited as saying in an interview published by Caixin Century magazine on its website on Dec. 31.

The logistics federation's manufacturing index is based on a survey of purchasing managers in more than 820 companies in 20 industries. The HSBC PMI covers about 430 businesses.

--Victoria Ruan, Zheng Lifei. Editors: Paul Panckhurst, Ryan Woo

China Manufacturing Index Rises Even Amid Threats to Growth - Businessweek
 

cir

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
1,996
Likes
269
:thumb:



China's 1st super large balanced compound TBM launched

Source:Time:2011-12-31

On December 25, China's first independently developed and the world's largest turbid-water air balanced compound Tunnel Boring Machine(TBM) ("Tianhe I") manufactured by CCCC Tianhe Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd. went offline, followed by a launch ceremony in Changshu, Jiangsu Province in the same day. Among attendees were Jiang Hongkun, member of the Standing Committee of the CPC Jiangsu Provincial Committee and secretary of the CPC Suzhou Municipal Committee; Xu Guang, chief engineer of the Ministry of Transport; and Chairman Zhou Jichang and Vice President Chen Yun of CCCC.

In a speech, Zhou noted the launch of "Tianhe I" has further improved the company's equipment manufacturing level and contributed to CCCC's efforts to become an internationally advanced shield manufacturer and promote the development of China's shield manufacturing. He required CCCC Tianhe to take the opportunity to make full use of CCCC's advantages in talent, equipment, science and technology, and R & D, to intensify localized development, to constantly occupy the commanding height of associated equipment manufacturing, thus making new greater contributions to the development of China's equipment manufacturing.

With a diameter of 14.93m, a total weight of 4,500t, a driving speed of 5cm/min and a maximum daily driving capacity of 20m, "Tianhe I" is customized by CCCC Tianhe for the project of the cross-river tunnel on Weisan Road, Nanjing. The equipment integrates the world's existing cutting-edge manufacturing technologies, has achieved major breakthrough in a series of key technologies, and owns 13 independent intellectual properties, of which five are original in the world and five original in the country. The machine perfectly meets the requirement for constructing the tunnel across the Yangtze River in complex geological conditions.

All super large TBM previously used in the country were imported. According to estimate, compared to its overseas counterparts, "Tianhe I" is expected to save fabrication cost by some 15%, and reduce the cost of post maintenance and technical guidance by over 30%, thus effectively reducing the cost of production and maintenance.

China Communications construction company Ltd.-Company News
 

nitesh

Mob Control Manager
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
7,550
Likes
1,308
Here comes the Chinese biggest achievements, bloody losers

Made in India, faked in China- $5bn loss - The Times of India

New Delhi: Chinese manufacturers are increasingly "faking" popular Indian products of consumer goods giants such as Dabur and ITC, undermining the legitimacy of brands and causing losses worth as much as $5 billion annually, officials said.

"A lot of counterfeit Dabur products are made in China. We have conducted at least 20 raids in China but no proper action has been taken by the Chinese," said Ashok Jain, general manager of finance at Dabur India, the country's fourth largest FMCG firm.

He said such fake products manufactured in China with "Made-in-India" tag are supplied across the world, mostly in India and African countries.

"It causes huge damage to the brand. Those fake products are obviously not up to our standards and supplied at very low prices," Jain told IANS.

Dabur, which has nearly $4 billion market capitalisation, operates in key consumer product categories like healthcare, skin care, hair care and oral care. The company's revenue last fiscal was $910 million.

Pradeep Dixit, a senior official of ITC, a $33-billion conglomerate, said the popular FMCG brands of the company were counterfeited by unscrupulous firms and supplied in domestic as well as foreign markets.

"Our popular cigarette brand is faked and supplied widely in the states like Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Uttar Pradesh," he said.

"China is a big problem everybody is facing," said S.K. Goel, chairman of the Central Board of Excise and Customs, told IANS.

Goel said the big international brands like Nokia, Adidas, Reebok and Nivea were also widely counterfeited in China and supplied in India and other parts of the world.

Chinese manufacturers are also faking drugs, endangering lives of patients. Fake drugs, carrying " Made in India" tags, supplied from China were recently detained in Nigeria and other African countries.


K.K. Vyas, Delhi's deputy commissioner of police (crime), said the police have seized and confiscated a lot of fake and counterfeited products of popular brands in the national capital recently.

Vyas emphasised on the need for enhancing punishment for unscrupulous manufacturers and importers. "Punishment needs to be enhanced. Also there is need that judiciary addresses these issues quickly."

"Counterfeiting is a big menace. It is hurting everybody - consumers, industry and the exchequer," said Anil Rajput, chairman of the anti-smuggling and anti-counterfeiting committee of Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI).

Recently, FICCI formed a panel called "FICCI-Cascade" that expands into a committee on anti-smuggling and counterfeiting activities destroying the economy. Chaired by Rajput, the committee is working closely with the government to curb this menace.

According to a report by think tank Indiaforensic Research Foundation, the total loss to the economy annually due to crimes such as counterfeiting, commercial fraud, smuggling, drug trafficking, bank fraud, tax evasion and graft is estimated at Rs.22,528 crore.
 

cir

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
1,996
Likes
269
Unscrupulous Indian businessmen and traders should stop coming to China and asking the Chinese to "counterfeit" their products so that the former might sell for good prices with basement costs in their home market。

Bloody Indian traders making a pile out of their fellow countrymen。

Indian traders should immediately cease ordering and importing cheap and low-quality Chinese products。 These guys should be held responsible for cheating Indian consumers with products that the Chinese themselves don't give a damn about。

Don't blame the manufacturers, who make things to orders。 Blame or even imprison those Indian traders or businessmen who place orders and sell to the Indian consumers!!!

Heard of the tiny city of Shaoxing? Known as the Little India in China, It has over 20,000 Indians living and working there。 These Indians thrive on the single premise of sourcing and making to order cheap and inferior products with a view to selling them for fat profits back home。

Indian consumers should never ever trust these greedy traders!!
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
Are you serious? The shops and networks being raided are run by Chinese.
 

cir

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
1,996
Likes
269
PetroChina, Sinopec to invest $22 bln in petrochem projects

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2011-12-28
reuters.com

PetroChina Co Ltd and China Petroleum & Chemical Corp (Sinopec) have signed an agreement with the Zhejiang government on six petrochemical projects worth 139.1 billion yuan ($22 billion), the official China Securities Journal reported on Wednesday. The report said the two companies would work with Zhejiang provincial government to strengthen the supply of natural gas and refined oil, and build facilities, without citing sources.

PetroChina would cooperate with Zhejiang to promote a project in Taizhou and to build compressed natural gas and liquefied natural gas plants for PetroChina Kunlun Gas Co and Quzhou government, the newspaper said. Sinopec would focus on development of a long-distance natural gas pipeline between Xinjiang and Zhejiang, and Wenzhou Sinopec LNG projects, it said. In October, China National Petroleum Corp, parent of PetroChina, said it had signed an initial agreement, together with Royal Dutch Shell Plc and Qatar, with the local authorities in Zhejiang for a proposed oil refining and petrochemical joint venture
 

nitesh

Mob Control Manager
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
7,550
Likes
1,308
Unscrupulous Indian businessmen and traders should stop coming to China and asking the Chinese to "counterfeit" their products so that the former might sell for good prices with basement costs in their home market。

Bloody Indian traders making a pile out of their fellow countrymen。

Indian traders should immediately cease ordering and importing cheap and low-quality Chinese products。 These guys should be held responsible for cheating Indian consumers with products that the Chinese themselves don't give a damn about。

Don't blame the manufacturers, who make things to orders。 Blame or even imprison those Indian traders or businessmen who place orders and sell to the Indian consumers!!!

Heard of the tiny city of Shaoxing? Known as the Little India in China, It has over 20,000 Indians living and working there。 These Indians thrive on the single premise of sourcing and making to order cheap and inferior products with a view to selling them for fat profits back home。

Indian consumers should never ever trust these greedy traders!!
SO Chinese are slaves of these Indians, evil Indians making Chinese dance to their tune, oh come on go to the re education camp of CCP, and come with something better
 

cir

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
1,996
Likes
269
China's largest wind farm blows into operation

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Last Updated: 2011-12-29
en.ce.cn




China's largest offshore wind power plant began operation in Rudong county, East China's
Jiangsu province, Dec 28, 2011. Constructed by the GD Long Yuan Power Technology &
Engineering, it has a gross capacity of 150 MW.



Part of a wind turbine is hoisted at an offshore plant in Rudong county, East China's
Jiangsu province, Dec 27, 2011.



China's largest offshore wind power plant starts operation in Rudong county, East China's
Jiangsu province, Dec 28, 2011.



A worker performs checks at an offshore wind power plant in
Rudong county, East China's Jiangsu province, Dec 27, 2011.



Location of the Rudong wind farms
 

cir

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
1,996
Likes
269
The Chinese Solar Machine

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chinese manufacturers have dominated the international market for conventional solar panels by building bigger factories faster. Now they will need to innovate to maintain their lead.

January 2012
By Kevin Bullis
technologyreview.com

Ten years ago, solar panels were made mostly in the United States, Germany, and Japan. Chinese manufacturers made almost none. But by 2006, the Chinese company Suntech Power had the capacity to make over a million silicon-based solar panels a year and was already the world's third-largest producer. Today Chinese manufacturers make about 50 million solar panels a year—over half the world's supply in 2010—and include four of the world's top five solar-panel manufacturers. What makes this particularly impressive is that the industry elsewhere has been doubling in size every two years, and Chinese manufacturers have done even better, doubling their production roughly every year.



This dominance isn't due to cheap labor in Chinese factories: making solar cells requires such expensive equipment and materials that labor contributes just a small fraction of the overall cost. Nor is it because the Chinese companies have introduced cells that last longer or produce more power: by and large, they make the same type of silicon-based solar panels as many of their competitors around the world, using the same equipment. They have succeeded in large part because it's faster and cheaper for them to build factories, thanks to inexpensive, efficient construction crews and China's streamlined permitting process. The new factories have the latest, most efficient equipment, which helps cut costs. So do the efficiencies that come with size. As a result, Chinese manufacturers have been able to undercut other makers of silicon solar panels and dash the hopes of many upstarts hoping to introduce novel technology.

But the solar market is rapidly evolving, and technological innovations are becoming increasingly essential. Though demand for solar power continues to grow around the world, the market is flooded with photovoltaic panels: worldwide production capacity more than doubled from 2009 to 2010 and continued to increase in 2011. The overcapacity was so great that last fall, Chinese manufacturers had trouble selling solar panels for more than it cost to make them. In such a market, the way to differentiate your product—and charge enough to stay afloat—is to make it better than your competitors'. For solar manufacturers today, that means inventing cells that are more efficient at converting light to electricity. As the price of solar panels has fallen, installation costs have come to account for a greater percentage of solar power's cost. Customers want panels that are more powerful, so that they can install fewer of them. From now on, the best way for Chinese manufacturers to lower the cost per watt of solar power may not be by lowering manufacturing costs but, instead, by increasing the number of watts each panel generates. "The game is now changing," says Mark Pinto, executive vice president of energy and environment solutions at Applied Materials in Santa Clara, California, the world's largest supplier of solar manufacturing equipment. "Before, it was all about scale. Now it is about conversion efficiency while keeping the cost down."

This might sound like bad news for Chinese manufacturers that have focused on scaling up standard technology. But their experience in building conventional solar panels could help them implement new designs that significantly boost the performance of silicon solar cells. Over the years, these manufacturers have lowered costs in part by developing better ways to manufacture the cells. That's given them an understanding of what works and what doesn't on the factory floor. They also have the capital and the engineers to help them translate newer technologies into mass production. They might not have initially set out to commercialize those technologies, but now, having mastered the market for conventional solar panels, they're poised to do just that.

KEEPING PACE

In 2010, when the U.S. secretary of energy, Steven Chu, gave a speech to the National Press Club laying out his case that the United States was falling behind in advanced manufacturing, Suntech Power was his Exhibit A. He had toured its factory, and he was impressed by what he'd seen. "It's a high-tech, automated factory," he said. "It's not succeeding because of cheap labor." Not only that, he noted, but Suntech had developed a type of solar cell with world-record efficiencies.

Chu's assessment might have surprised some observers, but Suntech's record-setting solar cells are impressive. The technology that goes into them takes advantage of changes in both design and manufacturing technique. The conductive metal lines that collect electric charge from the silicon aren't created with screen-printing methods, as is standard. Instead, Suntech uses a proprietary process to deposit much thinner, more closely spaced lines that are more efficient at extracting electricity from the cells. The changes have allowed the company to reach efficiency levels and cost reductions that an industry road map released in 2011 had set as targets for 2020. "When you put all those things together, we are not only doing better than what people are doing now," says Stuart Wenham, the chief technology officer at Suntech. "We are also doing better than what they think they could be doing in 10 years."

So far, Suntech has made relatively few solar panels based on the new technology. Instead, it has focused its resources on tweaking manufacturing processes to decrease the cost of making conventional silicon solar panels. But that could soon change. This year Suntech has started to increase production of the new cells, and now it can make enough of them annually to generate 500 megawatts of power—roughly 2.5 million solar panels. That achievement owes much to the company's success as a producer of the conventional products.

The technology behind the new cells was developed in the 1990s at the University of New South Wales, Australia, but the techniques used in the lab were too expensive for commercial production. It was a "horribly sophisticated process" including photolithography, vacuum deposition of "quite exotic metals," and "all sorts of chemical processes," says Wenham, who is also head of the photovoltaics research program at UNSW and was formerly a professor of Suntech's CEO and founder, Zhengrong Shi. According to Wenham, the technology remained a lab curiosity for decades until Suntech's researchers figured out how to adapt it to an assembly line. "They came up with a simple, low-cost way to replace all of that while achieving the same results," he says. The new technology could increase the power output of a standard-sized solar panel from 205 watts to 220 watts or more—and the cells costs less to produce than conventional ones.

Individual parts of the technology were quickly successful. Suntech introduced these into its standard manufacturing lines, with an eye to keeping just ahead of its competitors in terms of cost and efficiency. Scaling up the complete process, however, was a challenge. A pilot manufacturing line was up and running in 2009, but the company had to develop and implement new equipment to get yields and production rates to the point that the process was economical. Here Suntech's position as a market leader with experience in developing new manufacturing equipment proved critical. Not only did the company have the expertise it needed to improve the process; it also had the funds to keep working on the technology for years without its bringing in significant revenue.

Suntech isn't the only Chinese solar manufacturer to identify promising new technology and find ways to produce it at a large scale. Last September, Yingli Green Energy, based in Baoding, announced that a partnership with a Dutch research center, ECN, had yielded solar panels that could convert 17.6 percent of the energy in sunlight into electricity; the average is just over 14 percent. "ECN made the technology available to anyone in the world who wanted it," ¬Wenham says. "Yet it's only been Yingli that's taken that technology and worked out how to make it in large-scale production, at low cost."

MATERIAL ADVANTAGE

Even now that Chinese solar manufacturers are shifting focus from production to innovation, there may be limits to what they can do with their chosen material, crystalline silicon. This material is attractive because the industry knows how to work with it, thanks in part to decades of research in silicon microchips. But compared with some other semiconductors, it's lousy at absorbing sunlight. Some alternatives, like gallium arsenide, can be made into films of material that can generate as much electricity as a typical silicon cell but are just a hundredth as thick, potentially reducing material costs. Such thin films can also be flexible: they could be rolled up, reducing packaging and shipping costs, and they could be built into roofing shingles to reduce installation costs.

Yet despite their potential advantages, it has been difficult for thin-film solar cells to compete with the ever decreasing costs and improving efficiency of crystalline silicon ones. One company, Arizona-based First Solar, has succeeded in developing low-cost manufacturing techniques for thin-film solar panels, but these methods use a material—cadmium telluride—that results in panels less efficient than silicon ones. Other companies have tried to compete with silicon by using higher-efficiency thin-film panels of copper indium gallium selenide. Some of them, however, have had to declare bankruptcy and close their factories after failing to lower manufacturing costs fast enough.

Despite these struggles, Wenham believes that thin-film technology will eventually challenge conventional solar panels. If that's true, Chinese makers of crystalline silicon solar cells may not dominate the market forever. But the strategy of first scaling up conventional technology and then introducing innovative designs to keep lowering the cost per watt of solar power has put them in a good position to maintain their lead for years. In the meantime, some, like Suntech, are working to produce thin-film panels of their own. When thin films do replace crystalline silicon, it could be Chinese manufacturers that make them.


Suntech headquarters in Wuxi, China


Suntech manufacturing plant in Wuxi
 

cir

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
1,996
Likes
269
The year when the Chinese economy will truly eclipse America's is in sight

Dec 31st 2011



IN THE spring of 2011 the Pew Global Attitudes Survey asked thousands of people worldwide which country they thought was the leading economic power. Half of the Chinese polled reckoned that America remains number one, twice as many as said "China". Americans are no longer sure: 43% of US respondents answered "China"; only 38% thought America was still the top dog. The answer depends on which measure you pick. An analysis of 21 different indicators chosen by The Economist (see the full set) finds that China has already overtaken America on over half of them and will be top on virtually all of them within a decade.

Economic power is best gauged by looking at absolute size rather than per-person measures. On a few indicators, such as steel consumption, ownership of mobile phones and beer-guzzling (a crucial test of economic superiority), the milestone was reached as long as a decade ago. Several more have been passed since. In 2011 China exported about 30% more than the United States and spent some 40% more on fixed capital investment. China is the world's biggest manufacturer, and partly as a result it burns around 10% more energy and emits almost 40% more greenhouse gases than America (although its emissions per person are only one-third as big). The Chinese also buy more new cars each year than anybody else.

The country that invented the compass, gunpowder and printing is also challenging America in the innovation stakes. We estimate that in 2011 more patents were granted to residents in China than in America. The quality of some Chinese patents may be dubious but they will surely improve. The World Economic Forum's "World Competitiveness Report" ranks China 31st out of 142 countries on the quality of its maths and science education, well ahead of America's 51st place. China's external financial clout also beats America's hands down. It has total net foreign assets of $2 trillion; America has net debts of $2.5 trillion.

The chart shows our predictions for when China will overtake America on several other measures. Official figures show that China's consumer spending is currently only one-fifth of that in America (although that may be understated because of China's poor statistical coverage of services). Based on relative growth rates over the past five years it will remain smaller until 2023. Retail sales are catching up much faster, and could exceed America's by 2014. In that same year China also looks set to become the world's biggest importer—a huge turnaround from 2000, when America's imports were six times those of China.

What about GDP, the most widely used measure of economic power? The IMF predicts that China's GDP will surpass America's in 2016 if measured on a purchasing-power parity (PPP) basis, which adjusts for the fact that prices are lower in poorer countries. But America will only really be eclipsed when China's GDP outstrips it in dollar terms, converted at market-exchange rates.

In 2011 America's GDP was roughly twice as big as China's, down from eight times bigger in 2000. To predict how quickly that gap might be closed, The Economist has updated its interactive online chart (also here) which allows you to plug in your own assumptions about real GDP growth in China and America, inflation rates and the yuan's exchange rate against the dollar. Our best guess is that annual real GDP growth over the next decade averages 7.75% in China (down from 10.5% over the past decade) and 2.5% in America; that inflation (as measured by the GDP deflator) averages 4% and 1.5% respectively; and that the yuan appreciates by 3% a year. If so, then China will overtake America in 2018. That is a year earlier than our prediction in December 2010 because China's GDP in dollar terms increased by more than expected in 2011.

Second place is for winners

Even if China became the world's biggest economy by 2018, Americans would remain much richer, with a GDP per head four times that in China. But Rupert Hoogewerf, the founder of the annual Hurun Report on China's richest citizens, reckons that it may already have more billionaires. His latest survey identified 270 dollar billionaires but the true total, he says, is probably double that because many Chinese are secretive about their wealth. According to the Forbes rich list, America has 400 billionaires or so.

America still tops a few league tables by a wide margin. Its stockmarket capitalisation is four times bigger than China's and it has more than twice as many firms in the Fortune global 500, which lists the world's biggest companies by revenue. Last but not least, America spends five times as much on defence as China does, and even though China's defence budget is expanding faster, on recent growth rates America will remain top gun until 2025.

Being the biggest economy in the world does offer advantages. It helps to ensure military superiority and gives a country more say in fixing international rules. Historically, the biggest economy has become the issuer of the main reserve currency, which is why America has also been able to borrow more cheaply than it otherwise would. But it would be a mistake for American leaders to try to block China's rise. China's rapid growth benefits the whole global economy. It is better to be number two in a fast-growing world than top dog in a stagnant one.
 

cir

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
1,996
Likes
269
Two things ref. the article above:

(1) China will average 8.5% real growth over the next 6 years
(2) China's inflation, as measured by the GDP deflator, has been 3-3.5% above the CPI for years. Low average CPI of 3% over the next 6 years gives 6-6.5% annual inflation

Taking these two factors with annual yuan vs dollar appreciation of 3% means that China is likely to surpass the US as the world's top economy in 2017.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top