aditya g
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2014
- Messages
- 1,962
- Likes
- 4,651
My principled opposition to creating a new force, is the lack of a sound basis. Secondly, the problem in India where original intent and purpose is soon forgotten once the empire is created. Let me elaborate both points.
- Law and Order, i.e. a peacetime activity is a function at the state level. The states need to take policing seriously and need to invest. If need be, they can ask for funds from centre (which is what centre normally does). A central force will not have the jurisdiction or power to arrest and investigate. Given the sea boundary is massive in India, creation of a new central force, with a specific mandate is going to be an extremely costly affair. You will get much more bang for buck if the local police does the job as they have other mandates as well and hence can cross-utilize resource.
- When the BSF was created, it was created as a paramilitary unit which could take on invading Pak Army. Infact in 1971 the BSF also carried out offensive ops. However, now they are designated and groomed as a "Central Armed Police Force" or CAPF - with no training or inclination to fight a military. Same situation is with ITBP. Both forces at best provide additional manpower to Army. The respected IPS member Dr. NS Asthana asked the question - what is the reason for BSF to exist if they cannot fulfill the original mandate? This is exactly what is going to happen with central marine force as well.
Thanks for posting the breakdown on various armed forces, armed police and paramilitary forces of India and Pakistan.
- Law and Order, i.e. a peacetime activity is a function at the state level. The states need to take policing seriously and need to invest. If need be, they can ask for funds from centre (which is what centre normally does). A central force will not have the jurisdiction or power to arrest and investigate. Given the sea boundary is massive in India, creation of a new central force, with a specific mandate is going to be an extremely costly affair. You will get much more bang for buck if the local police does the job as they have other mandates as well and hence can cross-utilize resource.
- When the BSF was created, it was created as a paramilitary unit which could take on invading Pak Army. Infact in 1971 the BSF also carried out offensive ops. However, now they are designated and groomed as a "Central Armed Police Force" or CAPF - with no training or inclination to fight a military. Same situation is with ITBP. Both forces at best provide additional manpower to Army. The respected IPS member Dr. NS Asthana asked the question - what is the reason for BSF to exist if they cannot fulfill the original mandate? This is exactly what is going to happen with central marine force as well.
Thanks for posting the breakdown on various armed forces, armed police and paramilitary forces of India and Pakistan.
But as I said in my previous post that state police are severly unfunded and their main force in itself in sorry state, heck I could still see armed units in metro cities like Chennai were police still use Ishapore rifles!! I can only imagine, what marine police looks like. But nevertheless, all states or at least almost all coastal states have a marine police force. At the end of the day, it's like CRPF RAF that assists State Police's own Riot police, and RAF is to complement their tasks!
Not only that, we can use CMPF in VBSS duties as well.
About pakis, they have Coast Guard, Navy, Maritime Security and even customs doing the same job.
Pls don't mind my handwriting
View attachment 64909