Krusty
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2015
- Messages
- 2,529
- Likes
- 4,873
Sorry just from a physics perspective, it doesn't make sense. Smoke or not, the gas trail will exit at the same temperature as the nozzle and the hot gases will cool down depending on the ambient temperature. I understand that visibly, it's an advantage, but don't see how devices looking for IR signature will find any difference unless the smokeless propellant burns at a lower temperature. Which I suspect since it will decrease the efficiency of the motor. The modern propellants pollute less and have a higher energy density, but for devices looking at IR signatures, which is basically only temperature difference, I don't see how that will be a big advantage. Can you please elaborate?smoke shows as a hot plume of heat on FLIR and it retains its signature for long time before dissipating by being smokeless there is no smoke trail which is neither visual thermally nor visual visually also astra's propulsion fluid is very different the exhaust it given out is very cool for lack of a better word cool in the sense it will be very hard to track from long ranges even on the best FLIRs and yet despite not releasing excessive IR signature it delivers the same punch / thrust for missile also the color of exhaust is very hard to get in a sky it literally burns blue which is damn near impossible to discern at the velocities that missile move trust me its a very very good missile atleast propulsion wise just need to put some decent seekers in it. and maybe make a ramjet in future.