I quoted your post in my last post above. I read and quoted the pile of inane arguments you made, just to feel good about yourself.
As about
@civfanatic's post, you want me to believe wikipedia over an article published in Nature!! His arguments are linguistic based, which have been clearly refuted by genetic and archaeological studies. As about the article in nature, they are not talking about how people look but the presence of a specific gene.
You are asking wrong questions and hence getting wrong answers. I will improve upon your questions:
- Do people in India have different appearances due to racial intermixing 4-5k years ago?
- Does racial intermixing 4-5k years ago has anything to do with a large percentage of light skinned people in the North West India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, contiguous with Iran?
- Does racial intermixing 4-5k years ago has anything to do with a large percentage of Mongoloid looking people in the North East and Ladakh, contiguous with Tibet?
If you cannot answer "
YES" to the above, then stop peddling BS on this thread. AIT/AMT has a specific time frame associated with it and if you cannot prove the time of inter-mixing then that theory is dead.