cannonfodder
Senior Member
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2014
- Messages
- 1,552
- Likes
- 4,354
I watched discussion. Most gene related research from other side has same connotations of cherry picking data to fit pre determined model. In most other cases, the data is collected is not enough to model the diverse indian population. So all and all, some unacceptable level of proof is required to remove it from text books. The same level of consistency/proof is not demanded from the other side. It is just incapability of govt & ministers to do anything.Old Ani Asi model had lots of ghotala wrt principle component analyses and lots of data was willingly omitted under sampled population samples etc etc etc. Then there is another issues wrt to Tmrca formation dates because R1a E1b and r1b had lower somatic mutation rates an important advice which is often willingly ignored.
There is also some butthurt in admission the fact that there was single out of africa migration from southern route towards Bharat.
Small percentage of steppy ancestry that reflects out of tourism is late as late as 800ad because we know sakas hunas etc assimilated with Rajputs and other Bhartiya and adopted Dharma. Waiting for Neeraj Rai's legendary paper the most extensive paper to date. A lot has been discussed in previous posts I will save your time you go through this.