How is its protection against RPG-7 shots and 12.7mm HMG?BTR-4MV
Shot m RPG in basic version, of course not stand. On the statement of the producers protects against 14.5 mm, and the bottom of the stand 6 kg of mine.How is its protection against RPG-7 shots and 12.7mm HMG?
Any pictures of the troop compartment I see it a continuation of Russia BTR concept and if you ask me the latest version of BTR-80 appears to be way better.Shot m RPG in basic version, of course not stand. On the statement of the producers protects against 14.5 mm, and the bottom of the stand 6 kg of mine.
The BTR-90 is dead! A "Boomerang" has not been created yet in the metal. And similar features can be found in many ACP's.Any pictures of the troop compartment I see it a continuation of Russia BTR concept and if you ask me the latest version of BTR-80 appears to be way better.
I precisely mentioned updated version of BTR-80 afaik its name BTR-82A.The BTR-90 is dead! A "Boomerang" has not been created yet in the metal. And similar features can be found in many ACP's.
Ukraine in the USSR never created APC. He has a modular design. In comparison with the BTR-82Ð motor is in the midst. Troops leaves the BTR-4 through a ramp . Other armor, the chassis. It is possible to put various combat modules.I precisely mentioned updated version of BTR-80 afaik its name BTR-82A.
What I really want to know is what is better in this BTR-4 over existing Russian BTR.
BTR-4MV seems to have better shaped front hull armor, when it comes to protection against small arms fire (12,7mm and 14,5mm). Also it is more ergonomic design due to engine placement and how dismounts get out of vehicle.I precisely mentioned updated version of BTR-80 afaik its name BTR-82A.
What I really want to know is what is better in this BTR-4 over existing Russian BTR.
Whatever the protection at the end of the day because of IEDs like in Chechnya there are great chances that troops might prefer to ride on that like BTR-70.And they don't need to be at the top. There is an uninhabited module, and the output from the rear.
This military armored personnel carriers. For guerrilla wars and police operations, Ukraine produces, together with India, KrAZ-MRAP When there was a war in Chechnya, in Russia there was no such class of armored vehicles,Whatever the protection at the end of the day because of IEDs like in Chechnya there are great chances that troops might prefer to ride on that like BTR-70.
I know MRAP are better suited for IEDs but if you compare with western APC correct me if I'm wrong but it seems their APCs have performed better in IED environment better crew survivability.This military armored personnel carriers. For guerrilla wars and police operations, Ukraine produces, together with India, KrAZ-MRAP When there was a war in Chechnya, in Russia there was no such class of armored vehicles,
BTR-4M withstand the detonation of a mine TM-57, but he is weak against bezobolochnoe fugass.I know MRAP are better suited for IEDs but if you compare with western APC correct me if I'm wrong but it seems their APCs have performed better in IED environment better crew survivability.
Is it a licence production of the TAPV or why does it look like a one-to-one copy?KrAZ-ASV
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
W | Thailand To Buy 34 Armored Personnel Carriers From China | Land Forces | 0 | |
W | Anoa Armored personnel carrier | Land Forces | 1 | |
W | Tata Kestrel: India’s First Amphibious 8x8 Wheeled Armored Personnel Carrier | Indian Army | 1 | |
India Reissues Tender for 100 Armored Personnel Carriers | Indian Army | 14 |