‘Are you a Chinese……… there are Chinese lettering at the bottom of your posts.
You accused me of the same thing not too long ago. Read this:-
‘Your opinion is Indian Navy propaganda to have third aircraft carrier. That propaganda centres around that one carrier is always under maintenance. That is a false assumption. Yes, aircraft carriers require maintenance every 2-3 years and upgrade 5 to 7 years. That is far less than the Indian...
defenceforumindia.com
Yaad aya?
.
I mean, we already have stuff like the Schilka which we recently upgraded with an AESA FCS, but there's very few (75 in 2010 according to wiki).
Exactly. Shilka is four 23mm autocannons hooked to a Radar and FCS. The concept itself isn't new. But its good for countering maybe one or two drones and doesn't work against swarms or as a C-RAM system. To take down a swarm, you need smarter weapons, like Oerlikon Skyguard with AHEAD ammo. And you need more than just one Shilka to match one Skyguard. And then when you have not one but several Skyguard systems protecting the same airspace and along with additional anti-drone systems such as the ones shown in this video:-
.
And then on top of it all, you have each tank capable of some anti-drone firing, due to Shilka-esque system (just with a 14.5mm caliber instead of 23mm).
All these systems together make the formation immune to attacks even by large drone swarms, forget the "single drone lucky shots" that has impressed
@Hari Sud so much.
TL;DR, we need multiple systems forming multiple layers of defence, all under same C2 so they can divide the workload and effectively engage a swarm of drones.
Good theory not practical. In last 100 years, (from 1919) the tank came and its fighting ability recognized and used. Then it’s demise is near or no more development as the anti tank weapons especially the top attacking missiles both by soldiers and by drones put an end to its war fighting ability.
Tank enthusiasts are differing because they have a vested interest in it or selling one or the other. But tanks demise is very near.
Instead of trying to repeat the same thing, how about you tell us how your drones would fair against the anti-drone measures we've mentioned? Go into details.
.
The only thing theoretical here is your tirade against tanks. arms races are as old as arms themselves. This is just a new arms race, nothing more, nothing less. It just adds a new dimension to warfare that didn't earlier exist. Our current Anti-Air measures don't prepare us against a large number of small, nimble threats. Eventually we'll figure it out. As we always do. Offence vs Defence is a game that goes on forever, each side one-upping each other, but never breaking into a clear lead.