Bhadra
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2011
- Messages
- 11,991
- Likes
- 23,756
It's superior in all parameters other than being more heavily built.
...And BOTH T-90s royally break down, in a really short run on flat ground, in front of the whole world to see the exact sorry condition of India's armour. Exactly!
In warfare, quantity itself has a value. One can learn it from Russian doctrines of warfare.
Now, look at this - for the price of 200 Arjun we bought 400 T-90.
Who has higher chances of winning a war in deserts for you ?? 200 guns Vs 400 guns ?
Obviously it is not rocket science.
Arjun and INSA and NAGMPATGM 0 very hard lessons learnt.INSAS was the crap that Army should have inducted in limited numbers & rejected for being problematic. Nobody is supporting quality compromise.
Had it not been so America and West not be inventing one new weapon every day and F-16 woud not have come to block 70.That's one thing & distortion of parameters is another.
But No Arjun any further !