pmaitra
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2009
- Messages
- 33,262
- Likes
- 19,600
Of course not, but then, you are still wrong to say a smoothbore has more accuracy. No, it does not. It is always less accurate, otherwise people still won't be making rifled ARs and LMGs, in this very 20th century. So, welcome to the 20th century. The laws of physics have not changed.Right and wrong at the same time. In the real world you won't find anybody take a shell meant for rifled gun and fire it form a smoothbore.
I understand, but then, surely, you are not saying text books are wrong, are you?If you talk about basic text book difference then that's not what I am interested in.
Newton said light travels in a straight line and it took one Einstein to prove it wrong. Sorry, you are not at that level.
No, it started with Damian comparing HESH with smoothbore, which is meaningless. That is because, apparently, he didn't know how HESH functions.When Damian and I were arguing about why HESH is useless it is you who brought in the function of the Rifled gun.
Well, then cite the reasons. Answer to the point.We rejected rifled gun for a whole host of other reasons which you claim to be unnecessary because, like I already said, you have one answer in your head and you want me to tell that. But I am not interested in that answer because in the real world that kind of a situation will never come up, ever.
You made a valid point about the life of a smoothbore and reduction in required pressure, but then you flooded your comment with a lot of information. Yes, all that information was correct, but since they were not answering the question, they are garbage nonetheless. Do you get this point, or not?
Not you, but it all started with a comment from Damian, not you.Aren't you bringing it up now? When did I ever relate Rifled guns and HESH to accuracy. We are talking about everything, but you want one single point which brings no value to the real life scenario.
Ok I gotta go, so I am skipping the rest of your post.