He literally said, "Wars have ceased to become an effective instruments to achieve your political or military objectives."
Political objectives was surprising for me tbh, cause sarhadon pe tanav hai lagta hai chunav hai
@9:40
Again, a single word can make a difference.
He did NOT say, "Wars have ceased to become an effective instruments to achieve
your political or military objectives."
Where the word your would be in respect to us fighting a war.
He said, "Wars have ceased to become an effective instruments to achieve political or military objectives."
In general. The next statement says:
"It is the civil society that can be subverted and compromised.
IT IS YOUR JOB TO MAKE SURE THIS LAND IS FULLY PROTECTED".
You see that? He is saying how a war might be an expensive option FOR THE ENEMY to start, which is why THE ENEMY MAY OPT FOR SUBTLER TACTICS LIKE MANIPULATION AND SUBVERSION.
He is talking from the perspective of the enemy.
He didn't say wars might be too expensive for us, so we should try to manipulate or subvert the societies of other countries.
Again, I agree it seems a bit underwhelming, should have been worded better, and they should be trying to inspire the people for war, not stating the obvious.
But you are grossly misunderstanding the purport of his statement.