Agni V Missile

plugwater

New Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2009
Messages
4,154
Likes
1,082
huh Manc c`mon. Silos are not meant for interceptors. Till now the launch platform of all interceptors that India has, are mobile 8x8 TELAR launchers. And these mobile launchers are stationed at the sensitive bases in sufficient numbers so no need for you to worry about that :p.
We have no other choice, we have to keep them in silos. One interceptor in each truck is simple a wastage of resources.
 

Yatharth Singh

Knowledge is power.
New Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2010
Messages
744
Likes
176
Country flag
We have no other choice, we have to keep them in silos. One interceptor in each truck is simple a wastage of resources.
Manc why dont you understand mate. Interceptors cant be stationed into a silo because we are not sure that from where the shield will be broken or from where the enemy missile will enter into our aerospace thus a silo may affect the range and capability of an interceptor.
 

JBH22

New Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2010
Messages
6,554
Likes
18,090
Is most of Indian ballistic missile truck based or silo one?TIA
 

plugwater

New Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2009
Messages
4,154
Likes
1,082
Manc why dont you understand mate. Interceptors cant be stationed into a silo because we are not sure that from where the shield will be broken or from where the enemy missile will enter into our aerospace thus a silo may affect the range and capability of an interceptor.
Mate i know what kinda advantages mobile has over silos. But its useless to deploy our interceptors with current dimensions in trucks. We have to settle with silos till DRDO reduces the interceptor sizes.
 

Yatharth Singh

Knowledge is power.
New Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2010
Messages
744
Likes
176
Country flag
Mate i know what kinda advantages mobile has over silos. But its useless to deploy our interceptors with current dimensions in trucks. We have to settle with silos till DRDO reduces the interceptor sizes.
But you cant reduce the size of a ballistic missile as they carry huge amount of warhead and fuel. And if we want to then obviously w have to compromise with its range and effectiveness.
 

plugwater

New Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2009
Messages
4,154
Likes
1,082
But you cant reduce the size of a ballistic missile as they carry huge amount of warhead and fuel. And if we want to then obviously w have to compromise with its range and effectiveness.
I am talking about interceptors not ballistic missiles.
 

ashicjose

New Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
399
Likes
60
its not necessary to being all interceptors in mobile launchers because our cities,ports,n-plants,factories,ammo-stores etc. are stationary,we can use these mobile launchers in our borders.i think we are trying to establish three lairs of interceptors and the last one can be in mobile launcher with shorter range.
 

plugwater

New Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2009
Messages
4,154
Likes
1,082
its not necessary to being all interceptors in mobile launchers because our cities,ports,n-plants,factories,ammo-stores etc. are stationary,we can use these mobile launchers in our borders.i think we are trying to establish three lairs of interceptors and the last one can be in mobile launcher with shorter range.
Incoming missile will be in mid course near our border we don't have the capability to intercept at that time. So deploying near border is not necessary.
 

ashicjose

New Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
399
Likes
60
while we tested the missile in orissa the distance in between two missiles was 70 kms
 

shuvo@y2k10

New Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
2,653
Likes
6,710
Country flag
i found an old article on the net.can anyone confirm whether this well extend the range of agni-5 from 5000km to 7000km at full payload.

http://www.domain-b.com/aero/mil_avi/miss_muni/20080910_Indian_technology.html

Indian-developed technology to boost range of missiles and protect re-entry vehicles news
Bangalore: Agni III, which is India's longest-range missile with a capability of striking targets 3,500 km away, may now have an extended range of around 5,000 km thanks to a unique solution discovered by Indian scientists at the prestigious Indian Institute of Science (IISc) here. The technology will increase the range of not just missiles but also other satellite launch vehicles.

The technology also has the exciting possibility of reducing the risk of occurrence of a Columbia space shuttle-type of tragic accident.

The enhanced range of an Indian re-entry vehicle or missile will now be due to a special-purpose coating of chromium metal applied to the blunt nose cone of missiles and launch vehicles, for which international patents have been sought for by the team of IISc scientists (See: Indigenous technology to increase range of Indian missiles by a third)

The prestigious IISc is celebrating its centenary this year.

''Objects such as missiles fly at hypersonic velocities which are more than five times the speed of sound and encounter atmospheric drag because of friction. The chromium coating works by adding temporary heat and pushing the stagnating gas away to create an easier path,'' G Jagadeesh, an assistant professor at the IISc here said.

The findings of the IISc team, which also includes Vinayak Kulkarni of IIT (Guwahati) and GM Hegde, E Arunan and KPJ Reddy, have been reported in the latest issue of the Physics of Fluids journal published by the American Institute of Physics.

Laboratory experiments have shown that atmospheric drag because of the coating fell by 47% and Jagadeesh said a ''conservative estimate'' was that this would result in range going up by at least 40%.

''The measurements show about 47% reduction in the drag coefficient for a 60° apex angle blunt cone in a Mach 8 flow of 3.4 MJ/kg specific enthalpy,'' reads an extract from the article in the journal.

Scientists say the breakthrough also has potential to avert disasters of the type that struck space shuttle Columbia in 2003, which resulted in the death of seven astronauts, including Indian-born astronaut Kalpana Chawla. The shuttle burned out as it was re-entering the earth's atmosphere as there were problems it's thermal protection system.

The special-purpose coating developed at the IISc could likely replace the tiles and panels which currently protect orbiters against extreme heat during re-entry into the atmosphere.

''The coating evaporates once the object has re-entered the atmosphere. This novel method is path-breaking because additional energy is not required to reduce drag; objects which travel into space need to carry a much lower fuel load,'' Jagadeesh said
Mod Edit: Link added , please try to post link for each article in future.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

sandeepdg

New Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Messages
2,333
Likes
227
no but we seem to be spending a lot on defensive and ignoring the offensive??
It very simple. You need to get an good hold on your defensive capabilities before increasing your offensive abilities. And we are not ignoring offensive abilities altogether.
 

LETHALFORCE

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,968
Likes
48,929
Country flag
Akash can only intercept cruise missiles LF, We are talking about ballistic missiles.
Green pine radar and Rajendra radar are mobile. AAD,PAD and PDV most likely will be used on mobile trucks like the pictures below.These will be used against ballistic missiles(IRBM'S)



 

LETHALFORCE

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,968
Likes
48,929
Country flag
What about those 2 new missile manufacturing complexes to come up Andhra Pradesh.Would'nt we be able to make missiles in large numbers once they are ready?
If we are making everything indigenously in these missiles, yes we can make large numbers.
 

LETHALFORCE

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,968
Likes
48,929
Country flag
It very simple. You need to get an good hold on your defensive capabilities before increasing your offensive abilities. And we are not ignoring offensive abilities altogether.
some milestones to look forward to:

ICBM
MIRV
SLBM
Long range Bombers
Long range hypersonic cruise missiles
 

shuvo@y2k10

New Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
2,653
Likes
6,710
Country flag
i don't think we have any plans to induct long range bombers in near future.also the cage like launcher of aad it seems that it can launsh only one interceptor at a time.i think the drdo should work on something tel of s-300/s-400 sam for our indegeneous bmd programme.
 

sandeepdg

New Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Messages
2,333
Likes
227
They would be hostile exactly for economic reasons, knock your competitor out and you have a bigger market, as is our neighbors to East view.
Its not only about the competing part, we are a huge market for the world. Our imports are still much higher than our exports, and may remain so for quite some time. Nobody would want bad relations with their biggest customer, even though they have frictions on certain issues. By the way, our eastern neighbor is our second biggest trading partner, and will increase with time to edge out the US as biggest trading partner. So, obviously they also know the consequences of hostile actions that can lead to a war.
 

LETHALFORCE

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,968
Likes
48,929
Country flag
Its not only about the competing part, we are a huge market for the world. Our imports are still much higher than our exports, and may remain so for quite some time. Nobody would want bad relations with their biggest customer, even though they have frictions on certain issues. By the way, our eastern neighbor is our second biggest trading partner, and will increase with time to edge out the US as biggest trading partner. So, obviously they also know the consequences of hostile actions that can lead to a war.
This year our Eastern neighbor passed USA to become our second biggest trading partner after UAE. USA is now #3.
 

Articles

Top