Flying Dagger
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2019
- Messages
- 3,583
- Likes
- 9,444
[
2. Rafale N doesnt have foldable wings. It is also not in production. MIG 29K is an older aircraft and has maxed out it's design space and also not in production.
F 18 SH is in production for a long time (USN ordered 110 for multiyear contract) and has a lot of the features as Rafale like AESA radar with specialization for Naval role and design maturity.
3. Tejas MK2 will come before AMCA and it is essentially a Gripen E/F variant. It will hold the fort till Su 57 gets Item 30 engines and full 270° - 360° AESA radar/antenna coverage and lower RCS and is inducted around 2025-26. AMCA will arrive by 2029-2030 and may even have indigenous engines by then.[/QUOTE]
1. Sorry but if you think a growler like platform can be replaced by an Israeli jamming pod .
A growler like platform would have never let the situation come to this . Do you know the no. Of jammer it carries and if you believe Israeli jamming pod ELL-8212/22WB is better I doubt that.
The radar warning and jamming pod a very advance communications receiver and jamming system for sead role
It's on another level bro.
And don't forget our communication were jammed too. Ew warfare capability should never be taken lightly.
2. It's not abt Rafale have foldable wings or not that was not the point. Rafale have naval as well as airforce version.
Rafale have slight advantage in its smaller size if not folding wings anyway. Mig 29k is still a beast what it need is funding but not much benefit for us anyway. The larger Mig 35 take care of short range and capability issue too.
But it's just a point I made for F 18 not being useful for Airforce as you suggested.
3. Date of AMCA is around 2032 it won't come before that later Yes
Mk2 is a decade away too. Airforce is looking for another fighter jet and we were discussing that since Rafale turns out to be costly and if MMRCA 2 ain't Rafale then F 18 is a good option with industrial development a very capable platform.
There is no such rule that you have to carry just one.You need just 1 per strike package. Countermeasures and evasive manuevers were used.
2. Rafale N doesnt have foldable wings. It is also not in production. MIG 29K is an older aircraft and has maxed out it's design space and also not in production.
F 18 SH is in production for a long time (USN ordered 110 for multiyear contract) and has a lot of the features as Rafale like AESA radar with specialization for Naval role and design maturity.
3. Tejas MK2 will come before AMCA and it is essentially a Gripen E/F variant. It will hold the fort till Su 57 gets Item 30 engines and full 270° - 360° AESA radar/antenna coverage and lower RCS and is inducted around 2025-26. AMCA will arrive by 2029-2030 and may even have indigenous engines by then.[/QUOTE]
1. Sorry but if you think a growler like platform can be replaced by an Israeli jamming pod .
Firing at Dmax essentially means even if it reached near around Sukhoi it had no energy to take down a manuevering Sukhoi .1. Firing at DMax has nothing to do with terminal guidance. Jammer pods disabled AMRAAMs before they hit MKIs. In Rafale, SPECTRA EW can perform SEAD missions! You thus don't need to buy a Growler variant because Rafale is a 2 in 1.
2. Rafale N doesnt have foldable wings. It is also not in production. MIG 29K is an older aircraft and has maxed out it's design space and also not in production.
F 18 SH is in production for a long time (USN ordered 110 for multiyear contract) and has a lot of the features as Rafale like AESA radar with specialization for Naval role and design maturity.
3. Tejas MK2 will come before AMCA and it is essentially a Gripen E/F variant. It will hold the fort till Su 57 gets Item 30 engines and full 270° - 360° AESA radar/antenna coverage and lower RCS and is inducted around 2025-26. AMCA will arrive by 2029-2030 and may even have indigenous engines by then.
A growler like platform would have never let the situation come to this . Do you know the no. Of jammer it carries and if you believe Israeli jamming pod ELL-8212/22WB is better I doubt that.
The radar warning and jamming pod a very advance communications receiver and jamming system for sead role
It's on another level bro.
And don't forget our communication were jammed too. Ew warfare capability should never be taken lightly.
2. It's not abt Rafale have foldable wings or not that was not the point. Rafale have naval as well as airforce version.
Rafale have slight advantage in its smaller size if not folding wings anyway. Mig 29k is still a beast what it need is funding but not much benefit for us anyway. The larger Mig 35 take care of short range and capability issue too.
But it's just a point I made for F 18 not being useful for Airforce as you suggested.
3. Date of AMCA is around 2032 it won't come before that later Yes
Mk2 is a decade away too. Airforce is looking for another fighter jet and we were discussing that since Rafale turns out to be costly and if MMRCA 2 ain't Rafale then F 18 is a good option with industrial development a very capable platform.
Last edited: