Confidence and safety is equivalent to capabilities and performance because of the faith in the machine being safe enough and capable enough hat such flights do not cause concern.
No it's not, it's as you said yourself "faith"! You have to keep in mind that these are not civil aircrafts, but fighters meant for war, but without capability you can't fight a war, no matter how safe the aircraft is.
The Mig 21s got reputation in India for 2 things, being "unsafe", but at the same time also being "capable", because of performance, BVR and EW capabilities of that time.
So it's good to have a safe fighter and have faith in the reliability of the engine, but the capability of the fighter is based on war fighting abilities and that's were we still are working on.
IAF is fully happy with the capabilities and performance of the aircraft despite what presstitutes "quoting" "an unnamed senior airforce official" have to say.
Not really, otherwise we would have seen far higher orders of LCA already, but the fact is, that LCA still doesn't meet the basic operational requirement so far. FOC was planned by ADA for 2015 and we hope to get it done this year. So don't confuse the feel good statements of LCA pilots, as the only truth. Of course they are proud and happy about flying an indigenous fighter, who wouldn't? But that doesn't translate into the fighter being capable to the operational needs of IAF in war times. Some of the LCA pilots are new once, who flew Hawks and Mig 21s, so is it surprising that they are amazed by the techs and systems of LCA? But do you think an MKI pilot would be as impressed by the performance and systems?
The recent report of Anantha Krishnan, was an excellent piece that focused on the IAF pilots, portrait their personal lifes and feelings (which was very interesting and well deserved, because the IAF pilots don't get enough credit for their work), but didn't gave much credible new infos on the fighter. So one has to distinguish between feelings for the fighter and the ground realities about it's capabilities here.
Tejas will be inducted into the IAF in increasing numbers and that's the way it should be. Once the infra is established, these initial planes will be replaced by MK1A and MKII and hopefully more iterations.
It's not the lack of infrastructure that is holding LCA back, but the slow development and FOC pace.
FOC => leads to approval for MK1A => which will be further developed into MK2.
"You cannot Make in India if you do not Invent in India."
That's factually wrong, since Make in India doesn't mean Make for India!
Tata producing fuselage for S92 helicopters is Make in India, Dhruv or LCA are Make for India.