- Joined
- Mar 6, 2011
- Messages
- 7,029
- Likes
- 8,764
After the CAG findings , following has been achieved,
the all weather clearance was obtained,and radome leakages sorted out.
wake penetration done,
brake deficiencies cleared,
the top speed mentioned by CAG for tejas at sea level is 1204 Km, mach 1 at sea level is 1225 Km.
So the shortfall from mach 1 is just 20 Km per hour nothing big so as to suggest design flaws.And ADA chief himself has said that tejas LSPs produced from low tech Jag production lines , has at least 6 percent aerodynamic deficiencies. And it wot be there from SO-3 onwards which are going to come from new high tech production lines. So lets see if mach speed at sea level is crossed or not. but the PIB press release of IOC-2 states that tejas is super sonic is at all altitudes . SO what is the truth right now is hazy.
Also IAF pathetically expressed that they dont even have preliminary knowledge about fighter design is shocking !!!!
And how can a fighter arm which has next to nothing knowledge about fighter design give a proper ASR?
SO the empty weight aim specified by IAF as 5500 Kg was unrealistic from the start . Thats why right from PV stage tejas consistently weighed 6.5 tons. ANd there is nothing wrong in that as gripen C too has about the same weight.
When CAG , queried why the liasion group between ADA and IAF for tejas design , which was to be set up by 1995 was set up only in 2007, IAf admitted they did not have preliminary design knowldge even to set up such a lission group is shocking!!!
With navy having fully functional and fully knowledgeable naval architects churning out ship design blue print, the admission by IAf that it doesn't even know the fighter design basics is the real reason behind the dumped marut and the delayed tejas programs.
Why such a state of affairs was allowed to exist is even more bizzare, Why couldn't IAF identify a few motivated pilots and asked them to pursue aeronautic engineering abroad and form a few dedicated fighter design teams that regularly churn out new ideas is a mystery to me.
Also the so called wrong air inlet clogging the engines which was the hobby horse used by tejas critics was not even mentioned in the passing!!!So it must be wrong also.
And the claim by IAF that finalization of weapon package should be done as close to operational deployment is even more stupid!!!
By the same logic will they ask Dassault to modify rafale to fit brahmos now?
What a jackass piece of logic is this?
Till 2009 IAF did not ask ADA to mate R-73 E to HMDS and radar!!!!
Till 2011 they didn't even identify the BVR!!!!
It seems the Derby missile which was to be mated to tejas has been procured only last year after IAf asked for this in 2011!!!!
So many reitred chair marshals of IAf who have been lying through their teeth that tejas is below mig-21 and all the delays were due to ADA should answer these above points,
Also by IAf's own admission they dont know jack about fighter design!!! A tech dummy Air force and lying generals faking non existing technical knowledge!!!! , which is dutifully reported by import lobby journalists as authoritative IAF view on tejas deisgn!!!!A combustible combination indeed.
Any way the saving grace is
the HMDS enabled R-73 E mating is over,
And Derby along with Quartz radome is already here to be mated and validated,
And 500 Kg russian ground bombs asked by IAF has been mated to tejas!!!
AOA 26 deg specified by IAF for 5500 Kg empty weight achieved even with 6500 Kg empty weight tejas.
So the weapon and radar combo is Okay .
And about the 53 critical shortfalls including brakes, all weather clearance and chutes , ADA says all of this has been done and only a dozen are being aimed for tejas mk2.
So a lot of developments have happened after CAG report also,
Thats why authoritative IAF test pilots swear that even tejas Mk1 is superior or equal to 45 million dollar per plane upgrade of mirage-2000.
Even the noted defence analyst Maroof Raza in today's Times Now Newshour program high lighted the severe maltreatment of tejas by IAF , which specified all needed weapons only in 2009 and 2011 and kept on adding cascading ever increasing requirements,
It is no wonder that the present IIT Eng educated defnce minister Manohar Parrikar severely castigated our defence forces for their "marvel comics " approach when it comes to ASR or GSQR definition!!! that too in the presence of our Ex Army chief by his side!!!
Well other than navy , no other indian defence arm has any worth while defence design tech it seems. In a nation bristling with largest number of engineering graduates this is a shame!!!
User doesn't know shit about fighter design,So how will they get involved?
But our retired chair marshal M. MAtheswaran once wanted to head the tejas project!!!!
And wanted to shut it down!!!!
By God's grace this has been avoided and we have a reasonable fighter at hand.
The question to be asked is Why IAF remained and continues to remain a tech dummy Air Force?
Why cant IA and IAf recruit few bright Eng grads and start their own design bureaus , like navy did?
Then only they can give realistic ASRs and GSQR
So tejas is not as operationally handicapped as many lying retired IAF chairmarshals make it out to be!!!
The report is for the period between 2009 and 2013.
now it is mid 2015. SO wake penetration, all weather clearance,sorting out braking problem and supersonic speeds at sea level are all done and it is not reflected in this report as these are latest developments,
Refer to PIB release of tejas at IOC-2.
Initial design was good. Final design is also good thats why award winning test pilot and experienced Mirage-2000 test pilot IAF group captain,Suneeth Krishna precisely said that ,"at its present form tejas mk1 is at least equal to the 45 million per plane upgraded mirage-2000".
CAG lists the primary reasons for delays , which were all due to late weapon specs by IAf as lates as 2009 and 2011 fro R 73 e mating with HMDS and Derby BVR.
Since tejas weapons package is all sorted out and STR crossing 16 deg per second even in hot indian conditions, there is no need to buy another single engined fighter for IAF.
Thats is what reflected in the presnt IAF chief's Aroop raha's categorical remark that ,"there is no doubt bout the fighting potential of tejas in IAF".
Retired IAf song birds can sing whatever they want, those doesn't count.
the all weather clearance was obtained,and radome leakages sorted out.
wake penetration done,
brake deficiencies cleared,
the top speed mentioned by CAG for tejas at sea level is 1204 Km, mach 1 at sea level is 1225 Km.
So the shortfall from mach 1 is just 20 Km per hour nothing big so as to suggest design flaws.And ADA chief himself has said that tejas LSPs produced from low tech Jag production lines , has at least 6 percent aerodynamic deficiencies. And it wot be there from SO-3 onwards which are going to come from new high tech production lines. So lets see if mach speed at sea level is crossed or not. but the PIB press release of IOC-2 states that tejas is super sonic is at all altitudes . SO what is the truth right now is hazy.
Also IAF pathetically expressed that they dont even have preliminary knowledge about fighter design is shocking !!!!
And how can a fighter arm which has next to nothing knowledge about fighter design give a proper ASR?
SO the empty weight aim specified by IAF as 5500 Kg was unrealistic from the start . Thats why right from PV stage tejas consistently weighed 6.5 tons. ANd there is nothing wrong in that as gripen C too has about the same weight.
When CAG , queried why the liasion group between ADA and IAF for tejas design , which was to be set up by 1995 was set up only in 2007, IAf admitted they did not have preliminary design knowldge even to set up such a lission group is shocking!!!
With navy having fully functional and fully knowledgeable naval architects churning out ship design blue print, the admission by IAf that it doesn't even know the fighter design basics is the real reason behind the dumped marut and the delayed tejas programs.
Why such a state of affairs was allowed to exist is even more bizzare, Why couldn't IAF identify a few motivated pilots and asked them to pursue aeronautic engineering abroad and form a few dedicated fighter design teams that regularly churn out new ideas is a mystery to me.
Also the so called wrong air inlet clogging the engines which was the hobby horse used by tejas critics was not even mentioned in the passing!!!So it must be wrong also.
And the claim by IAF that finalization of weapon package should be done as close to operational deployment is even more stupid!!!
By the same logic will they ask Dassault to modify rafale to fit brahmos now?
What a jackass piece of logic is this?
Till 2009 IAF did not ask ADA to mate R-73 E to HMDS and radar!!!!
Till 2011 they didn't even identify the BVR!!!!
It seems the Derby missile which was to be mated to tejas has been procured only last year after IAf asked for this in 2011!!!!
So many reitred chair marshals of IAf who have been lying through their teeth that tejas is below mig-21 and all the delays were due to ADA should answer these above points,
Also by IAf's own admission they dont know jack about fighter design!!! A tech dummy Air force and lying generals faking non existing technical knowledge!!!! , which is dutifully reported by import lobby journalists as authoritative IAF view on tejas deisgn!!!!A combustible combination indeed.
Any way the saving grace is
the HMDS enabled R-73 E mating is over,
And Derby along with Quartz radome is already here to be mated and validated,
And 500 Kg russian ground bombs asked by IAF has been mated to tejas!!!
AOA 26 deg specified by IAF for 5500 Kg empty weight achieved even with 6500 Kg empty weight tejas.
So the weapon and radar combo is Okay .
And about the 53 critical shortfalls including brakes, all weather clearance and chutes , ADA says all of this has been done and only a dozen are being aimed for tejas mk2.
So a lot of developments have happened after CAG report also,
Thats why authoritative IAF test pilots swear that even tejas Mk1 is superior or equal to 45 million dollar per plane upgrade of mirage-2000.
Even the noted defence analyst Maroof Raza in today's Times Now Newshour program high lighted the severe maltreatment of tejas by IAF , which specified all needed weapons only in 2009 and 2011 and kept on adding cascading ever increasing requirements,
It is no wonder that the present IIT Eng educated defnce minister Manohar Parrikar severely castigated our defence forces for their "marvel comics " approach when it comes to ASR or GSQR definition!!! that too in the presence of our Ex Army chief by his side!!!
Well other than navy , no other indian defence arm has any worth while defence design tech it seems. In a nation bristling with largest number of engineering graduates this is a shame!!!
User doesn't know shit about fighter design,So how will they get involved?
But our retired chair marshal M. MAtheswaran once wanted to head the tejas project!!!!
And wanted to shut it down!!!!
By God's grace this has been avoided and we have a reasonable fighter at hand.
The question to be asked is Why IAF remained and continues to remain a tech dummy Air Force?
Why cant IA and IAf recruit few bright Eng grads and start their own design bureaus , like navy did?
Then only they can give realistic ASRs and GSQR
So tejas is not as operationally handicapped as many lying retired IAF chairmarshals make it out to be!!!
The report is for the period between 2009 and 2013.
now it is mid 2015. SO wake penetration, all weather clearance,sorting out braking problem and supersonic speeds at sea level are all done and it is not reflected in this report as these are latest developments,
Refer to PIB release of tejas at IOC-2.
Initial design was good. Final design is also good thats why award winning test pilot and experienced Mirage-2000 test pilot IAF group captain,Suneeth Krishna precisely said that ,"at its present form tejas mk1 is at least equal to the 45 million per plane upgraded mirage-2000".
CAG lists the primary reasons for delays , which were all due to late weapon specs by IAf as lates as 2009 and 2011 fro R 73 e mating with HMDS and Derby BVR.
Since tejas weapons package is all sorted out and STR crossing 16 deg per second even in hot indian conditions, there is no need to buy another single engined fighter for IAF.
Thats is what reflected in the presnt IAF chief's Aroop raha's categorical remark that ,"there is no doubt bout the fighting potential of tejas in IAF".
Retired IAf song birds can sing whatever they want, those doesn't count.