- Joined
- May 26, 2010
- Messages
- 31,122
- Likes
- 41,041
More Photos from Tejas IOC2
All of them who have given their blood and sweat are smiling. Even Defence Minister is smiling.....Congrats to them and to their hard workMore Photos from Tejas IOC2
Back room Heros!!!More Photos from Tejas IOC2
people back in business, saying some himalayan truths like tejas is the only fighter in the world to have back up power to allow engine restart all due the only reason of having a smaller air intake which could not be altered even after 2500 testflights and a decade of redesign,FOC will also require higher AOA (Angle of Attack) from current 22-24 degrees to 28 degrees but this also has high risk element of Flame out. usually aircrafts are designed to handle much higher AOA then 28 degrees but Tejas Air-intakes which are smaller and have some design flaws might make it High Risk Test for Tejas , But ADA and HAL are planning to integrate a Backup Power Pack to allow engine restart if flames out does occur has a safety mechanism.
Well same R&D (Rhona&Dhona)from our namesake forums, seems guys never get tired of lying,I don't disagree with that at all. Rafale gets something like 34-35 deg/s with canards. Gripen should not do as much, but should be a little closer to the mark. LCA requirements asked for Mirage-2000 like specs with around 29-30 deg/sec instantaneous. The STR of LCA is also around Mirage-2000's figures, around 17 deg/sec versus 24 deg/sec on Rafale. So, to get these simpler specs, canards were unnecessary fixtures.
ADA said that the canards would improve maneuverability dramatically, like it is for the Eurocanards, but for the requirements IAF wanted canards are not needed, instead simpler wing root twist allows achieving requirements without the complexity of designing FBW for canards.
Thanks for the education. I learnt something today from your posts.Although the wing area is more than double that of the standard F-16 (633square feet vs. 300 square feet), the drag is actually reduced.
The skin friction drag that is a function of the increased wetted (skin surface) area is increased, but the other components of drag (wave, interference, and trim) that are a function of the configuration shape and arrangement are lower so that the "clean airplane" drag is slightly lower during level flight, and forty percent lower when bombs and missiles are added.
And although the thrust-to-weight (T/W) ratio is lower due to the increased weight, the excess thrust is greater because the drag is lower – and excess thrust is what counts."
Engine produces a fixed amount of thrust,
A part of the thrust is required to overcome the drag,
Remaining part of the thrust ,"effective thrust or excess thrust" is used for flight of the plane,
Due to low overall drag (which is a sum of three component drags ---wave+skin+interferance) much higher thrust is availablle for the plane to turn or roll or fly at a higher speed or fly farther.
Even though surface skin drag is high due to excess wing area of the large low wing loading wing, other components of drag like interferance and wave drag is reduced.
SO total air plane drag which is a sum of these three components of drag(skin, wave, interferance) is lower,
So Engine thrust-thrust required to overcome the air plane drag which is the effective thrust available for flight is higher for large wing loading cranked deltas like F-16XL and tejas,
That Aux intake has been redesigned. See LSP-7 and LSP-8they need to work on quality of metal work, if they want to have home grown world class fighter then they need to work on metal. This quality wont do.
thanks i remember we discuss this long time back hereThat Aux intake has been redesigned. See LSP-7 and LSP-8
indian radar range calibration is for 2 sq meters as fighter sized target ,Why the Radar Range is just 40-50 km ?
This is much less than preiously stated figures. Is this because of nose cone limitation?
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2
HAL should first replace MIG-21's immediately which are getting old. Only after that we will think about exporting Tejas to other countries.One thing we should start doing in the right earnest is to let Tejas participate in Major Airshows in the world , Paris , UK , Dubai , Maks.
Send 2 Tejas one on ground display and one flying , let the business and aviation folks see it perform would certainly raise many eyebrows via its performance.
With the cost and technology involved Tejas would be competitive against its peers of similar class and has good export potential.
Explained in post #1927 of this threadWhy the Radar Range is just 40-50 km ?
This is much less than preiously stated figures. Is this because of nose cone limitation?
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2
http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/indian-air-force/43717-ada-lca-tejas-iv-128.html#post828833Why the Radar Range is just 40-50 km ?
This is much less than preiously stated figures. Is this because of nose cone limitation?
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2
The aircraft is still in development, so give it time. Final MMR specs are supposed to be around 100 Km detection for a 5m2 target and a tracking range of 85 Km for a 5m2 target. These are a little better than Kopyo-M specs meant for Mig-21 Bison. I think even RDY-3 and Zhuk-ME specs are the same today. The move to AESA should considerably improve radar performance on Mk2. For Mk1 this is plenty.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
AERO INDIA 2021 | Science and Technology | 308 | ||
ADA Tejas Mark-II/Medium Weight Fighter | Knowledge Repository | 6 | ||
ADA Tejas Mark-II/Medium Weight Fighter | Indian Air Force | 8939 | ||
P | ADA DRDO and HAL Delays a threat to National Security | Internal Security | 20 |