New Assault Rifles for Indian Army

Discussion in 'Indian Army' started by Galaxy, Nov 30, 2011.

?

Which Contender`s Rifle has more chances of winning than others?

  1. Beretta`s ARX160

    20.6%
  2. Colt`s MGI multi-caliber

    7.5%
  3. IWI`s Galil ACE Series

    26.0%
  4. Sig-Sauer`s Classic Series

    8.2%
  5. Czech`s 805 BREN

    5.7%
  6. IWI`s TAR-21 / X-95

    32.0%
  1. Hari Sud

    Hari Sud Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2012
    Messages:
    1,549
    Likes Received:
    1,683
    Location:
    Ontario
    When all these rifles have been dumped by the Army, then why are we talking about them.
     
  2. SREEKAR

    SREEKAR DEEP STATE Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2015
    Messages:
    4,200
    Likes Received:
    6,644
    Location:
    Milky way galaxy

    Came across this.
    ..
    ..
    ..
     
    Haldiram and Bleh like this.
  3. mohitbhagat

    mohitbhagat Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2015
    Messages:
    162
    Likes Received:
    102
    Actually were getting Ak103m which was renamed as ak203. But ak203 and Ak12 are different rifles and should not be confused with each other
     
    mist_consecutive and Holy Triad like this.
  4. mohitbhagat

    mohitbhagat Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2015
    Messages:
    162
    Likes Received:
    102
    1st of all its not shit and 2nd MCIWS hasn't even completed its full development yet forget about being tested and proven
     
  5. mohitbhagat

    mohitbhagat Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2015
    Messages:
    162
    Likes Received:
    102
    Well our SFs already uses m4a1/Ace32. So it would not be a surprise if they adopt car816 and ak203, both are excellent weapons. Also Sig 716 can be an excellent weapon against foes with body armors
     
  6. Holy Triad

    Holy Triad Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2018
    Messages:
    1,191
    Likes Received:
    8,137
    mohitbhagat likes this.
  7. Gessler

    Gessler Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2016
    Messages:
    1,152
    Likes Received:
    2,363
    Location:
    Vizag, India
    Why do you think that? The AR-18 is not a very widely used design, not to mention to the best of my knowledge, we never operated any AR18 in India so where could we have acquired the design?
     
  8. Twinblade

    Twinblade Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,468
    Likes Received:
    2,604

    Steyr AUG.
    SA80
    G36
    Fn SCAR
    ARX160
    And countless other modern rifles are based on AR18 design.
     
  9. Gessler

    Gessler Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2016
    Messages:
    1,152
    Likes Received:
    2,363
    Location:
    Vizag, India
    ...none of which we operate (save for SCARs in small numbers here and there).

    So I still have to wonder where the connection to AR-18 comes from. All those guns had licensed the design from US, which we obviously haven't (not the type to do so either), so I'm gonna have to assume they took apart an AR-15, studied it, and applied a piston system to it.

    Admitted, with the piston system and the apparent lack of a buffer tube, its likely they drew design cues from the 18, but very unlikely they studied the design off of anything other than a 15. The 15 DNA is very much present, courtesy the charging handle for example.
     
  10. Twinblade

    Twinblade Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,468
    Likes Received:
    2,604
    The Belgians and swiss didn't operate AKM to base Fn FNC and SiG 550 based ok AKM operating system. Neither did Austrians operate AR-18 to use it as a base to design Steyr Aug. AR-15 and AR-18 designs are more than 50 years old by now and virtually public domain knowledge.
     
  11. Gessler

    Gessler Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2016
    Messages:
    1,152
    Likes Received:
    2,363
    Location:
    Vizag, India
    But what design feature is it that makes you think its based on AR-18?

    If it was based on AR-18, why does it have an AR-15 type charging handle?
     
    Subham Show likes this.
  12. Bleh

    Bleh Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    980
    Likes Received:
    2,211
    No doubt the SIG-716 purchase is a great deal at great price, but why buy more underpowered 5.56 for carbine?
    And now the retards are contemplating using the Ak-203 as carbines in Kashmir by removing the buttstock... LIKE JIHADI FUCKING MILITIA!!!
    Army-Pulwama.jpg
    Why can't we just get more X-95 Zitara as Carbine for CQB & COIN? Although it costs almost 1.5 lakh a piece, we'll be ordering massive batches.
    1. It's already manufactured by OFB in India.
    2. It's being widely used in COIN by the Cobras.
    3. It's a bullpup & perfect for CQB.
    4. It's accuracy & barrel-length(13”) are pretty high for a carbine.
    5. It's ultra-compact light-weight (<3 kg).
    6. It's ambidextrous & reliable, can fire in rain & dirty.
    7. It's got p-rails & polymer body.
    8. It's capable of using 5.56mm ammunition & 9mm ammunition, by just switching barrel in minutes.
    9. It's perfect to replace all 9mm carbines & old Aks.
    28235644_861256124047924_8465379029106836982_o.jpg
    DhZShEzWsAAs7GR.jpg
     
    Last edited: Apr 10, 2019
  13. binayak95

    binayak95 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,324
    Likes Received:
    2,432
    Location:
    Cuttack, Orissa
    Sab theek hai - except OFB doesnt have the skill or the brains to make anything close to the error margins required for Tavors. The deal fell through - like really quickly.

    Punj Lloyd and Kalyani now make X95s and F90s respectively though.

     
    aditya10r and Subham Show like this.
  14. Bleh

    Bleh Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    980
    Likes Received:
    2,211
    Ok, Punj Lloyd then...

    X-95 probably got the highest velocity & accuracy 9mm round on market & available to be made in India!
    Both OFB & Army brass can compete for trophy of "India's biggest dumbass".
     
    Pandeyji, ShoorVeer, Bhumihar and 2 others like this.
  15. Holy Triad

    Holy Triad Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2018
    Messages:
    1,191
    Likes Received:
    8,137
    Although Using three calibres(7.62x51,7.62x39,5.56x45) is a logistical nightmare to the troops,each calibre has it own merits.

    5.56 calibre may not be successful against jihadi scums, but very good calibre against conventional military soldiers.
    It holds flat trajectory and most importantly it can penetrate through level 3 armours including BPJs and BPHs.

    As for as X95s, I think of three reasons,
    1.Ar15 types can be easily field stripped incase of malfunction.(Since X95 have a closed polymer body some parts are not accessible for field maintenance,such as gas tube)

    2.many of soldiers are comfortable with handling AR15s (example ease of mag loading,but bullpups needs a learning curve)

    3.There is a myth or discomfort around polymer based weapons among serving higher officers around the world about durability issues,fire resistance etc.( I don't condone this view)

    Apart from this,there may be "hidden" reasons though. But imo entirely ditching 5.56 calibre is not a good idea.
     
    Kay and Bleh like this.
  16. Bleh

    Bleh Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    980
    Likes Received:
    2,211
    The X-95 can be 5.56mm, but Zittara is also compatible with Indian 5.56x30 cartridge (level iii penetrator) & good old 9x19mm cartridge. Takes just a different barrel, that can be issued as per unit requirements.
    Also 33cm barrel of X-95 is claimed to be able to accelerate its 9mm rounds with higher accuracy & velocity. There are 9mm shaped to penetrate level iii.

    I read an NSG officer's interview after 26/11 that their MP-5's 9mm can do much more damage than Ak's 7.62... So i doubt jihadis would be a problem.
    Not deal-breaker issues, given that its primary users right now are the Cobra with 12000 being used by CRPF (took 1 lakh/unit for that order-size).

    Either their old-is-gold mentality make Indian Army's dinosaurs incapable of thinking ahead into future... or
    another "hidden reason" comes in mind, that i don't like.
     
    Last edited: Apr 10, 2019
    Kay and Holy Triad like this.
  17. armyofhind

    armyofhind Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2014
    Messages:
    1,053
    Likes Received:
    1,309
    Location:
    New Delhi
    Lol. Don't talk without knowing stuff.
    My cousin back in his undercover days used to carry an AK under his phehran with the buttstock off.
    Easily concealable.
    That's what SF does day in and day out. Beat terrorists by being better than them at their own game.

    If the SF guys choose to do it, you as a keyboard warrior have no place to tell them what they should or should not do. And definitely not call them retards.
     
    Kay, Gessler, MuzzleVelocity and 2 others like this.
  18. Holy Triad

    Holy Triad Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2018
    Messages:
    1,191
    Likes Received:
    8,137
    What you are referring is in the "magic" realms of ballistics. Various ballistic tests are scattered all around the YouTube, about the penetrating capabilities claiming so and so calibre is better.

    Minsas and 9mm can penetrate bpjs but after penetration these rounds loses kinetic energy rapidly. Main culprit is lesser loadout capacity of these rounds(the 5.56x45, 45 mm worth of gun powder, whereas minsas only 30mm)

    9mm have one more issue,which is post 100mts it loses energy rapidly(all heavier rounds performs poorly over distances) due to its weight,wind resistance etc.

    But 5.56x45 rounds performs consistently over 400 to 500mts. This is where barrel length comes in play,carbines will hold about 300 to 400mts,but bullpups and full length barrel weapons like m16 will gives you much better 600mts.

    Personally I'm not partial to bullpups, but in military circles there are two kinds of camps,one people who loves bullpups and people hates them and think of them as "abominations". This is more based on ego rather than reality.
    More Evidently,you can see it on the SF units.Single unit will have operators with combination of tavors,m4s and modded AKs.

    For me, it doesn't make sense when we see it as a big picture,but each camp run with their own philosophy.

    Bottom line is, the argument over which is the best calibre? Is the Raging question among all top military and specops guys.
    Even unkil specops trying new calibres like 300 blackouts,APCs etc. They even use different loadouts for the calibres.
    For me Mission based calibre is best way to go for the SF guys.

    It's a confusing argument, looks like our guys "trying"out all the options.
    Like you,I too have concerns over how all this different calibres will fit into our services in the coming future.
     
    Kay and binayak95 like this.
  19. Bleh

    Bleh Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    980
    Likes Received:
    2,211
    Greatest reason it should be considered first is, unlike AK-203 or CAR-816, X-95 is already made & operated in large numbers in India!!!
    Lol. And SAS used Sterling SMG in WW2. And Sivaji used a waghnakh. So?

    For that exact role, today the X-95 would be WAAAY more concealable & easier to fire (even with one hand) than any buttless Ak, 9mm giving MUCH better controllable auto-fire & damage, plus supresser. Won't you agree?

    And let's not kid ourselves, our SF was/is equipped more like "Jihadi militia" than proper SF... some here are quite vocal it. Instead of glorifying that, it's better to try & change.
    Not really... And i'm not taking about SF (they can have as much variety they want) but regular infantry of the Army who're getting 5.56mm for carbine.

    Sub-machine guns & carbines were dominated by the 9mm callibre. In case is Indian army, coupled with Sig-716 they'd not need too long range, but excell at CQB & COIN compared to both 5.56 & 7.62, right?
    This bullpup X-95 having long barrel can negate 9mm's shortcomings by a bit & would be a decent compromise than having several guns for each 5.56mm, 7.62mm, 9mm (Army bought a bunch of new SMGs too) all at once!

    Also the X-95 is a multical & modifiable... so there'll room to change if required.
     
    Last edited: Apr 10, 2019
    Pandeyji and Kay like this.
  20. Johny_Baba

    Johny_Baba अज्ञानी Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2016
    Messages:
    1,147
    Likes Received:
    2,790
    [​IMG]

    Well our SF guys indeed used AR-18,but i don't have the pic anymore as it shows dead link.

    Originally it was posted by Shatrujeet where they mistakenly called it 'M16A1'

    i hope someone from shatrujeet would repost the image to make things clear @hammer head @Bornubus

    source - https://defenceforumindia.com/forum/threads/indian-special-forces.33520/page-296#post-1333975
     
    aditya10r, Kay and Gessler like this.

Share This Page