HariPrasad-1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2016
- Messages
- 9,621
- Likes
- 21,088
I think Polio Vaccine.Which vaccine is the cause of more that half of the cancers of the world?
Same way stay away from angiography, bypass surgery and heart medicines. It will kill you. I will soon post a case study here with heart almost on the verge of failure to a very healthy heart in one and half of a year. It will shake you guys. Many will find it difficult to even recognize it but I will post that with all reports done by the best cardiologist of the city and tell you guys how to overcome diabetes and heart issues.
Cancer risk associated with simian virus 40 contaminated polio vaccine
S G Fisher 1, L Weber, M Carbone
Affiliations expand
- PMID: 10472327
Background: The presence of SV40 in monkey cell cultures used in the preparation of the polio vaccine from 1955 through 1961 is well documented. Investigations have consistently demonstrated the oncogenic behavior of SV40 in animal models. Early epidemiologic studies were inadequate in demonstrating an increase in cancer incidence associated with contaminated vaccine. Recently, investigators have provided persuasive evidence that SV40 is present in human ependymomas, choroid plexus tumors, bone tumors, and mesotheliomas, however, the etiologic role of the virus in tumorigenesis has not been established.
Materials and methods: Using data from SEER, we analyzed the incidence of brain tumors, bone tumors, and mesotheliomas from 1973-1993 and the possible relationship of these tumors with the administration of the SV40 contaminated vaccine.
Results: Our analysis indicates increased rates of ependymomas (37%), osteogenic sarcomas (26%), other bone tumors (34%) and mesothelioma (90%) among those in the exposed as compared to the unexposed birth cohort.
Conclusions: These data suggest that there may be an increased incidence of certain cancers among the 98 million persons exposed to contaminated polio vaccine in the U.S.; further investigations are clearly justified.
Similar articles
- Potential exposure to SV40 in polio vaccines used in Sweden during 1957: no impact on cancer incidence rates 1960 to 1993.
Olin P, Giesecke J.Dev Biol Stand. 1998;94:227-33.PMID: 9776244 - Contamination of poliovirus vaccines with simian virus 40 (1955-1963) and subsequent cancer rates.
Strickler HD, Rosenberg PS, Devesa SS, Hertel J, Fraumeni JF Jr, Goedert JJ.JAMA. 1998 Jan 28;279(4):292-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.4.292.PMID: 9450713 - Simian virus 40 (SV40)-like DNA sequences not detectable in finnish mesothelioma patients not exposed to SV40-contaminated polio vaccines.
Hirvonen A, Mattson K, Karjalainen A, Ollikainen T, Tammilehto L, Hovi T, Vainio H, Pass HI, Di Resta I, Carbone M, Linnainmaa K.Mol Carcinog. 1999 Oct;26(2):93-9.PMID: 10506753 - Is there a role for SV40 in human cancer?
Poulin DL, DeCaprio JA.J Clin Oncol. 2006 Sep 10;24(26):4356-65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.7101.PMID: 16963733 Review. - New developments about the association of SV40 with human mesothelioma.
Carbone M, Pass HI, Miele L, Bocchetta M.
SV40 and human mesothelioma
Michele Carbone 1, Adi Gazdar 2, Janet S Butel 3
Affiliations expand
- PMID: 32206570
- PMCID: PMC7082262
- DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2020.02.03
Abstract
Simian virus 40 (SV40) is a DNA tumor virus capable of infecting and transforming human mesothelial (HM) cells in vitro. Hamsters injected intracardially to expose most tissue types to SV40 preferentially develop mesotheliomas. In humans, asbestos is the main cause of mesothelioma, and asbestos and SV40 are co-carcinogens in transforming HM cells in tissue culture and in causing mesothelioma in hamsters. Laser microdissection experiments conducted in the laboratory of Adi Gazdar demonstrated that SV40 was present specifically in the malignant mesothelioma cells and not in nearby stromal cells. Further experiments demonstrated that SV40 remains episomal in HM cells and astrocytes because of the production of a long antisense RNA that represses viral capsid protein production. Thus, the potent SV40 oncoprotein, T-antigen (Tag), is expressed, but because the capsid proteins are not produced, the cells are not lysed and, instead, become transformed. Together this evidence suggests that SV40 may contribute to the development of mesotheliomas in humans. However, epidemiological evidence to support this hypothesis is lacking. This chapter also summarizes the introduction of SV40, a monkey virus, into the human population as an unrecognized contaminant of early poliovaccines. In addition to mesotheliomas, SV40 now is linked with brain cancers, osteosarcomas, and lymphomas in humans. Explanations are provided for the apparent geographic variations in SV40 prevalence and for controversies about the role of SV40 in human cancer.
Keywords: Simian virus 40 (SV40); asbestos; cancer; mesothelioma.
Poisonous, filthy, loathsome, damnable stuff': the rhetorical ecology of vaccination concern
Bernice L Hausman 1, Mecal Ghebremichael 2, Philip Hayek 1, Erin Mack 3
Affiliations expand
- PMID: 25506275
- PMCID: PMC4257028
Abstract
In this article, we analyze newspaper articles and advertisements mentioning vaccination from 1915 to 1922 and refer to historical studies of vaccination practices and attitudes in the early 20th century in order to assess historical continuities and discontinuities in vaccination concern. In the Progressive Era period, there were a number of themes or features that resonated with contemporary issues and circumstances: 1) fears of vaccine contamination; 2) distrust of medical professionals; 3) resistance to compulsory vaccination; and 4) the local nature of vaccination concern. Such observations help scholars and practitioners understand vaccine skepticism as longstanding, locally situated, and linked to the sociocultural contexts in which vaccination occurs and is mandated for particular segments of the population. A rhetorical approach offers a way to understand how discourses are engaged and mobilized for particular purposes in historical contexts. Historically situating vaccine hesitancy and addressing its articulation with a particular rhetorical ecology offers scholars and practitioners a robust understanding of vaccination concerns that can, and should, influence current approaches to vaccination skepticism.
Keywords: immunization; rhetorical ecology; smallpox; vaccination; vaccine.
Similar articles
- Another vaccine, another story: BCG vaccination against tuberculosis in India, 1948 to 1960.
Brimnes N.Cien Saude Colet. 2011 Feb;16(2):397-407. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232011000200004.PMID: 21340316 - The discontinuation of routine smallpox vaccination in the United States, 1960-1976: an unlikely affirmation of biomedical hegemony.
Rich M.Cien Saude Colet. 2011 Feb;16(2):471-7. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232011000200010.PMID: 21340322 - [Marked on the skin: vaccination and smallpox in Argentina (1870-1910)].
Di Liscia MS.Cien Saude Colet. 2011 Feb;16(2):409-22. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232011000200005.PMID: 21340317 Spanish. - Historical aspects of immunization and vaccine safety communication.
Helfert SM.Curr Drug Saf. 2015;10(1):5-8. doi: 10.2174/157488631001150407103723.PMID: 25859668 Review. - A brief history of vaccines & vaccination in India.
Lahariya C.Indian J Med Res. 2014 Apr;139(4):491-511.PMID: 24927336 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by 2 articles
- Vaccine Rejection and Hesitancy: A Review and Call to Action.
Smith TC.Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 18;4(3)fx146. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx146. eCollection 2017 Summer.PMID: 28948177 Free PMC article. Review. - Vaccination persuasion online: a qualitative study of two provaccine and two vaccine-skeptical websites.
Grant L, Hausman BL, Cashion M, Lucchesi N, Patel K, Roberts J.J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 29;17(5):e133. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4153.PMID: 26024907 Free PMC article.
Stay away from any vaccine. It will kill you or harm you. All vaccines are bogus. Please stay away.
Last edited: