What is best calibre for an Assault Rifle?

Sunder singh

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Messages
539
Likes
143
dear frnds i want to know what is Best caliber
bullet for an assault rifle for india against of enemies or possible enemies and why did india replaced 7.62 with 5.56 bullet how is it diffrent from chinese 5.8 bullet .
which bullet is supperior 5.56/ 5.8/ 7.62/6.5.
plz clear confussion .....
 

bhramos

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
20,075
Likes
19,846
Country flag
i will go with 7.62mm is best in war...
5.56mm is good for Urban Ops..

and 7.62 mm is best.....
 

pmaitra

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
33,270
Likes
19,493
plzz may b they can also tell about countering chinese 5.8 caliber
Calibres I have shot:
  • 11.43×23mm
  • 9×19mm
  • 7.62×39mm
  • 5.7×28mm
  • 5.56×45mm

I am a civvie, and don't know which one is the best in what kind of combat.

I wish I could give you more details.
 

Akim

Professional
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
6,185
Likes
2,790
Country flag
From calibers 5,45, 5,56, 5,8 the best are a 6,5 mm! What caliber at the assault rifles of India - 7,62*39? Here him and use. On the Chinese cartridge, nothing will say is I him in hands did not hold. On «soviet» and NATO littleimpulsive cartridge too much censures. They are good only on flat locality. Substantial advantages between them it is not, unless 5,45 - a mm heavier than wound to inflict. Both cartridges often ricochet and in city and in forrest. In mountains, where pressure of air below, they lose the internalss also. India with anybody does not stand in military alliances, what to use identical standards. Pass at once to the caliber 6,5*39 мм. And М-4 and Ак-74, easily Remade under this caliber.
 

Sunder singh

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Messages
539
Likes
143
thanks akim i have herd that in somalia that nato used 5.56 against enemy, even geting a brust they again stand and start fighting plz tell why have we not chosed some so powerfull or intermidiate between 5.56 and 7.62.
 

Bhadra

Professional
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
9,853
Likes
11,914
Country flag
@Sunder Singh

Armies the world over an specially the NATO had settled for 5.56 as the best caliber for "Wars"..
By "wars" they meant conventional war.

Major reasons for that was

Make causalities rather than kill thereby increasing enemies logistics burden in evacuation.
7.62 X 52 was found to have excessive explosive forces and overkill, more bulky round thereby increasing weight of soldiers.
7.62 produced more flash and smoke with attendant disadvantages.
The Arms meant to fire 7.62 by logic had to be heavier.
Because of heavier and lengthy rounds magazine capacity was less.
Over all ammunition carrying capacity was less.
Battlefield needed increased volume of fire.


However, after the cold war ended the nature of warfare changed quite a lot with almost all conflicts being fought as small wars as LICO, against insurgents, less developed armies, terrorist, urban warfare's, jungle warfare. Now from from long range engagements it came down to short intense and CQB engagement. it is in context where the conventional armies find their conventional arms and ammunition specially 5.56 terribly unsuitable.

The requirement now is heavy volume of fire at CQB range, more kill probably and much more accuracy. That is why most of the LIC war and insurgency wars are being fought around 7.62 Russian short bullets which can be fired from all families of small arms like LMG , Rifles etc..
What has so far stood its ground is 7.62 / 39 which has become all most a universal calibre for almost all small wars... NATO is making amends to their traditional 5.56.

Besides this 7.62 X 52 has not lost relevancy to higher and heavier guns like MMG.
9mm still continues to dominate smaller sagements of armaments.
 
Last edited:

Akim

Professional
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
6,185
Likes
2,790
Country flag
When accepted a "small caliber" tasks which were then unfeasible to the weapon decided. We will begin with that in the USA there was not an «intermediate cartridge» in general, and the USSR in 1974 year he was accepted as an answer of NATO - besides did it by mistake. Modern rifles allow to decide the same tasks, but even with a large caliber. At the end of the USSR a caliber was developed 9*39 мм. He is now used in Russia and in Ukraine in the S.F. There are bi-caliber rifles which at easy alteration are able to shoot and 5,45 and 7,62 and 9 mm.

And about of the Chinese cartridge - will say so. For 20 years of his use, not a single country in the world did not show the personal interest to him. Probably it is on this occasion needed to be thoughtful...
 
Last edited:

Sunder singh

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Messages
539
Likes
143
@ Bhadra my question is why india is choose 5.56 as u said even NATO is eger to change caliber.
1. Regarding CQB battle is not ture in mountain warfare where u make trenches to defend ur post and c enemy from from distance over the mountain or below in river valley.
2. insas has low kill rate even if not been armored person.
3. how will an ifantry jawan react in case he faces chinese 5.8 heavy round.
 

methos

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
799
Likes
302
Which caliber is the best depends on the situation - on short range combat 5.56 mm NATO and similar rounds are quite useful, but on longer ranges larger rounds are required.

The 7.62 x 39 mm catridge of the older AK rifles is by far the worst caliber.
 

Akim

Professional
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
6,185
Likes
2,790
Country flag
Which caliber is the best depends on the situation - on short range combat 5.56 mm NATO and similar rounds are quite useful, but on longer ranges larger rounds are required.

The 7.62 x 39 mm catridge of the older AK rifles is by far the worst caliber.
Question. What parameters did you define 7,63*39 - worst?
 

Sunder singh

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Messages
539
Likes
143
Question. What parameters did you define 7,63*39 - worst?
1. i dont think 7.62 has more range then 5.56 but it has poor accuracy in AKs.
2. im not a fan of 7.62 bcoz contineouse firong makes for bit tired.
3. huge explosion near ur ears if some firing near u makes u almost deaf.
4. how many magines u can carry with a pair grinades plus pitthu and pouch etc.

why i hate about 5.56
1. no one want its enemy to stand and again fight after geting a hit from u or ur buddy.
2. bullet proof r bcoming lighter and tougher with kavler wat if its doesnt penitrate.
3. prone to climatic condition its rain allmost every day in north east india and snown above tawang and anni.
 

Bhadra

Professional
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
9,853
Likes
11,914
Country flag
@ Bhadra my question is why india is choose 5.56 as u said even NATO is eger to change caliber.
INDIA chose the calibre 5.56 for a conventional war as all reasons for choosing that were sound. But where did India fought conventional war. Rather her army is fighting unconventional wars. That is the requirement dilema!
1. Regarding CQB battle is not ture in mountain warfare where u make trenches to defend ur post and c enemy from from distance over the mountain or below in river valley.
There a soldier is required to engage the enemy the moment he is 400 m till he comes right next to him. there 5,56 would be ideal and INSA would be good as it can fire three round burst therby increasing the rate of fire.
2. insas has low kill rate even if not been armored person.
INSAS has a higher rate of fire and when it was developed in 70s there were no personal armour. And how many armies can afford personal armour for lakhas and lakhs of army personal for conventional battles.

3. how will an ifantry jawan react in case he faces chinese 5.8 heavy round.
He does not have to react. Firstly he can save his vitals by putting on personl armour . secondly if hit. he would be evacuated by two soldiers thereby reducing two soldiers in front line. He would also demoralise others. That is why making casualties was chosen over killing. But case of small wars killing has become more important than inflicting casualties. The shot must kill a man even it is on the leg. injuring a terrorist but living him surviving to kill you is not prudent.
 
Last edited:

Akim

Professional
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
6,185
Likes
2,790
Country flag
1. i dont think 7.62 has more range then 5.56 but it has poor accuracy in AKs.
2. im not a fan of 7.62 bcoz contineouse firong makes for bit tired.
3. huge explosion near ur ears if some firing near u makes u almost deaf.
4. how many magines u can carry with a pair grinades plus pitthu and pouch etc.

why i hate about 5.56
1. no one want its enemy to stand and again fight after geting a hit from u or ur buddy.
2. bullet proof r bcoming lighter and tougher with kavler wat if its doesnt penitrate.
3. prone to climatic condition its rain allmost every day in north east india and snown above tawang and anni.
Why then in the USA actively discuss passing to the cartridge of caliber 6,5-6,8 mm. And he on parameters nearer to М- 43 (7,62mm)?. There is the system: a weapon - a cartridge. you discuss a weapon only. Certainly АК, which was invented in 1946 not to compare to G - 11. But cartridge better what 223 Remington.
 

Global Defence

Articles

Top