"The issue today is will you give reigns of Hindustan to a person whose hands are soaked with blood. Usko darinda kehna bilkul sahi hai (it's perfectly correct appropriate to call him a demon)," Khan said. "You (Muslims) constitute one fifth of the population. You can't be the badshah but no one could become badshah without your blessings. Modi calls us, this one fifth of the population, kutte ka pilla (puppy). Kya electronic media ek hatyare ko badshah banayega? (will the electronic media make this murderer an emperor)," he asked
"Inteqaam ki aag ko apne dil me jagaye rakho. Us se inteqaam lo jo tumhe kutte ka pilla kehta hai. Pehle zaalim se zulm ka badla lena hai, cycle par button daba kar. Hindustan ko kasai ke haath nahi doge. Secular rakhoge (Keep the fire of revenge aflame in your heart. Take revenge against the one who calls you a puppy. First you must take revenge by pressing the button against the symbol of the cycle. Don't give India into the hands of a butcher. You have to ensure the India remains secular)," Khan said.
"For that you, the one-fifth will have to understand your power, the power of unity. If you get divided you can't accomplish the task," he said.
The senior Samajwadi Party leader also contrasted the hanging of Afzal Guru with the Supreme Court's recent decision to commute the death sentences of the assassins of Rajiv Gandhi and Devinder Bhullar. "Tumhe insaaf ki had kya hogi yeh tai karna hoga (you will have to decide what would be limits of justice) But then the Almighty has his system of delivering the justice," Khan said.
"If innocents were butchered in Gujarat then there was an earthquake there and death came from beneath the earth for many. That was God's sense of justice," he said.
"Sanjay Gandhi went on with his nasbandi scheme and how did he die? He took off alive and landed dead. What happened to those who laid the foundation stone of Ram temple at Babri Mosque? None of their family members died a natural death. Yeh Allah ka inteqaam hai," Khan said.
The Samajwadi Party leader took on the news channels for their coverage of the Muzaffarnagar riots. "They (media) claim to be sympathisers of the victims of the Muzaffarnagar riots. They showed bodies of those who died in riots but didn't show those who killed them. They reported the rapes, but didn't show the rapists. They showed burnt houses, but didn't show who burnt them. If they had shown it all, their own true faces would have come out," he said.
"Amit Shah is not just a goonda but is mahagoonda. The Supreme Court has barred him from entering the state. And this media calls me foul mouthed," he said.
The Samajwadi Party leader had the audience up on its feet by the end of his speech, applauding as he left.
Keep Indian Army out of politics specially your type of dirty politics. Do not advice yadavs of Indian Army who to vote for as they have a better judgment than that of yours. How do you know they vote for SP being yadavs. Keep your castist judgments to yourself when it comes to the institution like Army.And you FOOL, I was not talking about Yadavs in IA but those in UP whose boys, husbands, fathers go and serve in IA, and were SLURRED by this remark of Azam Khan. Those families who would know more about brotherhood of IA unlike couch-potatoes like us! How should Yogendra Singh Yadav feel about Azam Khan's remark?! Should not the people who holds the secular ideas above all, like the people in IA vote against the Party which try to polarize on the basis of Religion? If they should, should they not VOTE AGAINST such party? And if so, should the Yadav vote-bank which is one of the 2 pillars of SP, having a large no. of participation in IA, not VOT AGAINST SP?
And, don't come and teach me about IA, as you would make a very poor teacher!
First develop a brain to understand what is actually written, than coming with all muzzles blazing.
BTW, Mods would be too busy to go through every thread, just press the Report button.
This ba****d still has the audacity to justify his remarks...Talking to the reporters, Khan said: "What is the harm in talking about the contributions of Muslims for the country"¦why can't we talk about it? Why are the sacrifices of Muslim soldiers being ignored? What is so wrong about it? My statement on Kargil should be welcomed."
Sacrifice by all Indian being mentioned is laudable.https://indianexpress.com/article/india/politics/azam-khan-rakes-up-controversy-says-muslim-soldiers-won-kargil-war/
This ba****d still has the audacity to justify his remarks...
Oh! Bleeding heart! I think you go by same logic which vilifies the statement of Amit Shah!Keep Indian Army out of politics specially your type of dirty politics. Do not advice yadavs of Indian Army who to vote for as they have a better judgment than that of yours. How do you know they vote for SP being yadavs. Keep your castist judgments to yourself when it comes to the institution like Army.
Or enemy's of the Army will refranchise them quoting idiots like you.
Do not unnecessarily justify your slurs.
No offence intended.Oh! Bleeding heart! I think you go by same logic which vilifies the statement of Amit Shah!
No wonder those stupid channels have been doing business for this long with audience like you. Always ready to climb on the moral high horse and skimming the surface!
Btw, if you don't believe about castist Politics in UP, in that case you better not take part in any of the political debate. It is grown-ups' place for arguments.
Don't lecture me, and if you not like my post (to my utter dismay) put me on ignore list.
Meanwhile at recent Brainstorming session-Muslim Soldiers won KARGIL War
this is wat expected from a person who did randi baazi in amsterdam in his study tour in europe
Sir, I also did not mean any offence. I know a majority of J&K Light Infantry is Muslim, as well good no. Grenediers and Rajputana Rifles - and a scattering in other regiments including Mech. I believe they are actually more patriotic than me as they prove it day in and day out. But the speech of the Azam Khan definitely puts SP's agenda in clear day light and that is promotion of Muslims at the cost of Hindus and slurring the Indian army - not secular at all. That is why I said the Yadavs who are a vote bank - I speciafically mentioned Yadavs- for the SP should rise above their own narrow POV and see the SP in new light to what it actually is. I also wish the Muslims do the same - but not expecting it.No offence intended.
Just go by the composition of units in Kargil and check if this idiot Azam Khan has todld the truth or merely spoken total CO*k!
Oh My Dear Bhole,Oh! Bleeding heart! I think you go by same logic which vilifies the statement of Amit Shah!
No wonder those stupid channels have been doing business for this long with audience like you. Always ready to climb on the moral high horse and skimming the surface!
Btw, if you don't believe about castist Politics in UP, in that case you better not take part in any of the political debate. It is grown-ups' place for arguments.
Don't lecture me, and if you not like my post (to my utter dismay) put me on ignore list.
The objection is not that, The objectionable part is "Only Muslims and not Hindus" part of the assertionanalyst spoke on Times Now , There were hardly any Muslims in Kargil Operation .