smestarz
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2012
- Messages
- 1,929
- Likes
- 1,056
Are you trying to imply that Jaguar is way better than Su-34 in strike/naval strike on lo lo lo mission?You can check out the US invasion of Iraq to understand how even a low tech opponent can damage highly capable aircraft's intent on Deep penetration missions. You will be surprised at the number of aircrafts the US and its chamchas lost.
Deep penetration against AWACS equipped air force would be suicidal.
Added Later - Oh and forgot to add, till the upgrades Jaguars did not have auto pilot.
P-8I or Su-34 or Tupolevs of various types are all easily detectable.
We can think of Su-34 in anti ship role only because there is no opponent for us in the Indian Ocean who can bring an AWACS along, yet.
But if you really wish to support a P-8I with a single refuel range of something like 8000 km+ then you need at least an aircraft with a range of 4000+6000 km. And since all aircrafts are detectable by AWACS hence only a lo-lo-lo mission will work and that too would be a circuitous route, avoiding the AWACS. Su-34 in such mode would give a combat radius of 500 km with one Brahmos. Off course, such a scenario can only get played out in the far future. But who knows how the Chinese might behave. What if they donate a few J-20s and a bigger AWACS on friendship prices to Pakis.
Probably our people saw the possibility of this and hence there was some talk of equipping Tu142s with Brahmos. Because unless you have a few Tu-142 or Tu22M or Tu160 on call with such weapons as Brahmos, you really cannot make the best use of the P-8I.
Even the Chinese for their own swimming pool use these longer ranged bombers with long ranged cruise missiles. Despite the fact that they too are not short of Su-27 category aircrafts.
Added Later: Jaguars too were equipped with Sea Eagles. You can see how well it worked and judge for yourself how good these smaller fighter bombers are in the maritime role.