- Joined
- Oct 14, 2020
- Messages
- 28,260
- Likes
- 195,943
Why don’t we get an AR-15 as standard issue? And use M855A1round for it for CICT/COIN operations.M4 ain't going away soon
Why don’t we get an AR-15 as standard issue? And use M855A1round for it for CICT/COIN operations.M4 ain't going away soon
The carbine deal hopefully would do it.ak203 should be scraped so that I can die peacefully.OFB can make a better ak clone without ripping our pockets.Why don’t we get an AR-15 as standard issue? And use M855A1round for it for CICT/COIN operations.
I can adopt them and give them a good home .Then what would IA do with these SIGs 7.62 *51 ?
Metallurgy was some reasons peddled around if my memory serves rightThe carbine deal hopefully would do it.ak203 should be scraped so that I can die peacefully.OFB can make a better ak clone without ripping our pockets.
M4 ain't going away soon
Yes.Sig is supposed to have developed a new type of stell/brass hybrid 6.8 mm round, which can carry more gunpowder for increased energy.
Given we have already procured so many Sig 716s, can such round be developed by DRDO in 7.6*51 mm caliber?
The Army’s SAW and M4 replacement is headed to troops by 2022
The new weapons will bring the 6.8mm projectile into the U.S. military inventory for the first time.www.defensenews.com
The SIG MCX may get chosen as the next gen rifle and has started reaching the troops for final trial
Most of the infantry and the officers are taught little about ballistics. Ask them about the cross sectional density of the 7N31 or the muzzle velocity and ballistics coefficient of the Mk262 mod 0 and how they affect the trajectory, accuracy and terminal ballistics on target.That's according to you not Army majority of Army personal love ak they say it's best weapon especially chambered in 7.62×39 you see few videos on youtube and make conclusion too early if army wants 5.56×45 then they will highly go for ar15 type .
I wouldn't call that proper, trying to shoot a long distance target with C-clamp reeks of "tacticool" amateur. The C-clamp is a sure fire way of jacking up your deltoids, i'd like to see him keep a rifle stable like that hours into combat. The only real benefit it brings is better target transitioning in CQB. At range, I'd much rather preserve my energy.QBZ-191
View attachment 81941
View attachment 81942
View attachment 81943
View attachment 81944
Proper C-clamping being taught to PLA....and soon its going to be goodbye to the bullpup QBZ-95.
DRDO can develop it, but the mass production will go to OFB and they'll turn it into a complete pig's breakfast.Given we have already procured so many Sig 716s, can such round be developed by DRDO in 7.6*51 mm caliber?
Well I can't see where the targets are, can you?I wouldn't call that proper, trying to shoot a long distance target with C-clamp reeks of "tacticool" amateur. The C-clamp is a sure fire way of jacking up your deltoids, i'd like to see him keep a rifle stable like that hours into combat.
And better control on muzzle climb.the only real benefit it brings is better target transitioning in CQB. At range, I'd much rather preserve my energy.
The AK, even the FAB ones, are definitely not the most effective platform for C-clamping. The handguard isn't nearly extended far enough to get that muzzle control unlike contemporary AR-15 style rifles not to mention unless you've got optics, the thumb ends up obscuring the sight. The C-clamp is definitely a good tool to have, but it isn't revolutionary and it has it's pros and cons. I'd be more interested in seeing the real stuff like fire and maneuver drills, reaction to contact, how their COs/ JCOs and NCOs lead etc. All of these skills are not something the PLA is known for.Well I can't see where the targets are, can you?
Better to know all the techniques and apply each accordingly than not knowing.
The FAB AKs with optics are prime platforms for employing and getting feedback on this technique, haven't seen even top SFs employ it even in CQC, urban combat situations. It's just not taught in India.
And better control on muzzle climb.
AK has sufficient length for effective C-clamping by an average sized man.The AK, even the FAB ones, are definitely not the most effective platform for C-clamping. The handguard isn't nearly extended far enough to get that muzzle control unlike contemporary AR-15 style rifles
Went over this before within the first 5 or so pages of the new SF thread.not to mention unless you've got optics, the thumb ends up obscuring the sight.
True but for an outside watcher like you or me, the example of 1 technique coming over can usually serve as indication of others coming over as well - as it would imply a change in training doctrines after incorporating lessons learnt from joint exercises and what not. So far that's not happening.The C-clamp is definitely a good tool to have, but it isn't revolutionary and it has it's pros and cons. I'd be more interested in seeing the real stuff like fire and maneuver drills, reaction to contact, how their COs/ JCOs and NCOs lead etc. All of these skills are not something the PLA is known for.
Russian SSO and FSB Special Purpose Centres are writing the book on AK c-clamping as we speak - with or without a long, railed handguard.AK has sufficient length for effective C-clamping by an average sized man.
View attachment 81990
Went over this before within the first 5 or so pages of the new SF thread.
That's why I said FAB AK - where the PDC not only allows for optics, but also brings the sight line up from where a more traditional side rail-mounted optic would have it.
And most FAB AKs we have nowadays have some optic or the other these days - especially the SF ones. And this number is only going to increase in coming years.
Won't this obstruct case ejection ports?Russian SSO and FSB Special Purpose Centres are writing the book on AK c-clamping as we speak - with or without a long, railed handguard.
View attachment 81991
View attachment 81992
View attachment 81993
A long handguard would sure add more real estate for attachments - but its not necessary for effective C-clamping - not on the AK platform. That would be true on the M4 carbine platform with service-issue KAC rails, with the big front sight and short handguard.
For left handed shooting? Unlikely, the cases are ejected with a high enough up angle.Won't this obstruct case ejection ports?
Sight kholna nai sikhaya hai ise.Uzbek soldiers with Sig-716View attachment 82070
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
W | Russia to supply air defence system and small arms to Pakistan | Pakistan | 3 | |
Gun memes | General Multimedia | 83 | ||
Israeli-Indian JV to make small arms in private sector | Defence & Strategy | 15 | ||
India identifying requirement for small arms fire detection system | Indian Army | 6 |