No, it doesn't.
Pressler ammendment was an embargo on general sale. Not end user terms, which Clinton threatened Pakistan with. Ergo, your first statement is proven false. Why do you continue to lie ?
Yes, it does.
It also included the use of previously sold tranches
No it doesnt because Bill clinton unilaterally imposed end user terms post facto.
False. Pressler Ammendment is a general ban on selling weapons to Pakistan unless it can be proven that they do not possess nuclear weapons. Despite the ammendment, Pakistan recieved 40 F16s. Which had NO END USER TERMS ATTACHED. Yet Billy boy threatened embargo on their parts during Kargil. Thus proving that USA has the precedence of altering end user terms post facto.
There is no law by which end user clause can be enforced on COTS; even executive power of POTUS can't do that.
They had
Except that is literally what Billy C threatened.
False. There were ZERO terms of usage attached to the initial batch of F16s. Pressler ammendment does not deal with end user terms of sale of goods. It deals only with military and financial assistance towards states developing nuclear weapons.
> F-16 - FMS - End user clause - POTUS
The were covered
There was no end user clause to F16s sold to Pakistan in 1990s.
False. There is no coverage for end user terms under Pressler amendment. Its strictly to do with sale & assistance (military & financial). Not end user terms. So you lied. Why ?
Even Biden can't stop the use of 716i if we start shooting US Marines with them; as simple as it.
It also included the terms of use of earlier supplied planes.
No, but he can stop SERVICING of the 716i if we start shooting US marines with them. Its just that simple.
Tried my best to make you understand what ACTUALLY happened, vs what is 'on paper'. You seem too hardheaded and too young to comprehend the facts of 1999.
NO. FALSE. Prove it.
Objectively you are wrong. You brought up irrelevant points such as Pressler Amendment, which has NOTHING to do with end user terms. Which shows dishonesty. Ergo, your error is not from ignorance but malice- aka, lying.
Which brings us the points I've already mentioned some 30 minutes ago
This simply proves you have nothing substance to be here, just arguing with people like a toddler (which is unfortunate on your part as you're the one who keeps on bragging about his 40+ age and demeans everyone) any trying to prove them wrong
You mention falsehood, since US has demonstrated unilateral alteration of end user terms post facto.
The one without substance is you. You brought up an irrelevant amendment ( Pressler) to argue that Pakistani F16s they bought in 1990s had an end user agreement. When Pressler amendment does NOT deal with end user agreement, it simply deals with military sale/aid as well as financial aid to nations 'suspected of' making nukes ( and not the big 5) , requiring yearly POTUS waiver to do business with.
It's better to be a vassal of US than to be a slave of China ! Look @ SoKo , Japan , Western Europe & Taiwan . I'd rather have roof above my head & food for my children than wallow in sub Saharan standards/ violence etc for so called "FreeDumb" / "Demo_Crazy .
Correct. Its the city luddite Hindus who idolise the west and have adopted their utter trash values. Muslims are yet to. Thanks to India being mostly a rural nation, the ' net effect' on hindus is small - 1.9 vs 1.2-1.7 for whites. That is why hiduvta is so impotant to stem the rot.
Its not an either-or option.
Jab wo log Hume betray Kar hi denge to bus guns ko copy paste karna shuru Kar dena he.
Can they train folks if we pay them enough?
How many of them are 56% amerimutt.
