Apparently two posts ago you weren't aware of it and used it as a point of argument. Now you want to see what comes of it. Ok, I learnt my lesson about debating with you. Thanks.
The debate is still on whether they want manned unmanned, bomber or long range strike aircraft.
Let me also talk about both Russia and the US which operates a bomber fleet today.
The US has based all over the world. It allows them to stopover, rearm refuel etc. Soviet Union's large expanse of from Europe to Pacific and its satellite states allowed it to be able to launch bombers against US or Europe its enemies.
India has no bases across the globe. India is not even working to have bases partly because it does not have the capabilities right now and part no will or even use to have so. Even if we consider a 2025 operational Russian Bomber, how exactly will India use it? The Russian bomber is said to have a range of 9000 kms. If at all we had to bomb a target in Europe and come back, how would we achieve it without having bases in Europe or west Asia?