captscooby81
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2016
- Messages
- 7,371
- Likes
- 27,670
NLCA NP1 had made landing and take off from Viki
Did you find a video?good news coming in twin seat NP1 successfully performed a sortie.View attachment 41622
That's alright, they don't have to use the hump for fuel. NP-2 has a lot of equipment behind the pilot, probably moved due to reinforced undercarriage & huge landing gear:Ok... Yes, that part or the hump you are talking of could house sensors and electronics for sure. But LCA overall would not have that structure. Maybe we could se it in later versions but not in current ones. As far as testing of this model for drag coefficient is concerned, we have the test results in the LCA thread I believe which has been shared long back. It has been adequately tested.
IMO, using that hump for fuel tank purpose is not a good idea. Mig-29 does have such similiar structure which is used for sensor housing.
****** your J 15s are still in their egg.
wow it's reliability is even better than mig29.now believe how much potent will be tedbf if developed like this with superior twr and avionics it will be the best in its class.
Mig-29K is not only a suboptimal option but also our only option. And despite all the shortcomings it is much better than J-15; the widow-maker. So Navy will keep and use it in best possible ways till TEDBF arrives.As per 2016 CAG report, they have defects in engines, airframes and fly-by-wire systems. Serviceability of MiG-29K & KUB reached from 15.93%-37.63% & 21.30%-47.14%; respectively, with 40 engines (62%) being rejected/withdrawn from service due to design defects.
Why the fuck would they place the follow-up order of 29 more?!!.. They have, what, 44 now?.. That's enough for two 40k-45k ton carriers.
What'll be the role of 57 additional one then? All for the 3rd carrier, or they plan on getting rid of Mig-29K? ...And TEDBF?
Their planes are based on the Su 33 which is severely overweight and badly designed. Te numbers of J 15 are also limited so they need to start a second run again.They are flying from the deck of shandong and Liaoning . Which egg are you taking about ?
J-15 has serious FCS issues in addition to host of other mechanical class. One can copy Su-33 physically but copying FCS for complex Carrier based ops requires full understanding of the design. Collectively J-15 was a non starter from word go. Chinese are already developing a replacement.Their planes are based on the Su 33 which is severely overweight and badly designed. Te numbers of J 15 are also limited so they need to start a second run again.
What's trap, an arrested landing? And what's overshoot?
ADA is putting quite a show in front of Mig-29K fly boys. They are sure to get impressed.
Glad to see ADA learning to go bold.
Arrested landing is the one where you use hook into the wires to slow down.What's a trap?.. Arrested landing? And what's overshoot?
Also, haven't the released single video after that?
So a touch-&-go...............Overshoot is when you try to land, but for some reason have to keep running on the deck and fly out the other end.
Yes. Very essential since aircrafts often miss the arrestors at times during high tension.So a touch-&-go...............
'Bolter' and 'Trap' are USN lingo for Over Shoot & Arrested Landing, respectively.What's trap, an arrested landing? And what's overshoot?
Also, haven't the released single video after that?
In Vikramaditya, apparently they have 3 wires & you are supposed to go for the middle one... NP-2 landing missed it & caught the last.Aims for 3rd wire and guids his aircraft to it with mainly throttle adjustments.
Yo.. Any reply from them yet?Ok let me ask. . .
......Nilesh rane can ans too
damn it is even better than mig29More landings and take offs from both NP1&NP2 today
Bruv mig 29 can actually carry loads and stuff, why even compare NLCA is just a test bed.damn it is even better than mig29