very interesting! Any sourse?During greek Leo-2A6 turrets tests they used M332 APFSDS from Israel. It was very modern in 1990s round -whit long WHA rod, and really good penetration 600-650mm RHA at 2000m. In some vay it was analoge never introduced in to service 3BM42M Lekalyo (the same penetration). Leopard -2A6 turret windstand 18/20 shots (ussaly is given this value). What is important - NERA panels where not attached to the turret so real protection will be slighty bigger propably.
Well, most sources is non on paper -rather informal. If you want first first source in paper, then it was greek article about armour test from 2006.very interesting! Any sourse?
No, these modules seems to be 4S24 ERA.2S25 Sprut-SD with kinds of heavy composite side skirts ?
4S24 tiles
ERA cassettes or modules can differ in size but can contain exactly the same reactive element. Your making wrong assumption.
ERA box with 4S24 tiles (left) as compared to the earlier ERA box (designed in 2000) with 4S20 tiles (right).
=====================
From its size, It can be something new and not anyone of the above..
ERA box with 4S24 tiles (left) as compared to the earlier ERA box (designed in 2000) with 4S20 tiles (right).
ERA cassettes or modules can differ in size but can contain exactly the same reactive element. Your making wrong assumption.
To better fit a different hull, or in case of 4S24, for weight reasons. 4S24 was designed such way, that despite increased weight, vehicle can still have it's original amphibious capabilities.In that case there is a question why so ?,
When there is no issue mounting the existing once, Why for one platform this radical change has been done ..
To better fit a different hull, or in case of 4S24, for weight reasons. 4S24 was designed such way, that despite increased weight, vehicle can still have it's original amphibious capabilities.
2S25 use a different hull than BMP-3, which means that ERA modules might have a nececity for a different size to improve vehicles displacement in water.
Kontackt-1 is a First Gen ERA, very old and has low effectiveness. 4S23 Kontackt-5 and 4S24 Relikt are more modern ERA, which include better shaping, materials and design to get more effectiveness.What is the effectiveness of such ERA blocks compared to the more common Kontakt-1 ?
Their size does not imply that they may be hollow ...to improve the buoyancy of the overloaded AFV ?
Kontackt-1 is a First Gen ERA, very old and has low effectiveness. 4S23 Kontackt-5 and 4S24 Relikt are more modern ERA, which include better shaping, materials and design to get more effectiveness..
You confused designations.Kontackt-1 is a First Gen ERA, very old and has low effectiveness. 4S23 Kontackt-5 and 4S24 Relikt are more modern ERA, which include better shaping, materials and design to get more effectiveness.
Estimating is probably a dream, but K-5 should be 30-40% more effective than K-1 and Relikt should be better.
Yes, very good for India to have protection against only ancient PG-9 and PG-7 )))))))))These are multi layered ERA, The ERA block contain many layers of dynamic protection also have more explosive, These are fire resistance too and have ability to take multiple hits from low / med caliber such as 30mm shells and RPG hits ..
Interesting ..
===================PShoped ))))
Yes, very good for India to have protection against only ancient PG-9 and PG-7 )))))))))
Shaped charge jet is not molten. It is deformed and propelled by explosion metal which perforate armor by use of pressure (somewhat similiar to kinetic energy penetration) not temperature by molting armor.Ever got hit by molten heat wave ?
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
W | Pakistan show interest in Ukraine Oplot main battle tank | Pakistan | 0 | |
T-80UD Main Battle Tank - A Pakistani Perspective | Defence Wiki | 0 | ||
W | Taiwan will purchase 108 M1A2 Abrams main battle tanks from U.S. | Land Forces | 6 | |
W | Pakistan Procuring 300 T-90 Main Battle Tanks from Russia. | Pakistan | 68 |