Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

If Tanks have to evolve, which path they should follow?

  • Light Vehicles-Best for mobility

    Votes: 25 7.3%
  • Heavy Armour-Can take heavy punishment.

    Votes: 57 16.7%
  • Modular Design-Allowing dynamic adaptions.

    Votes: 198 58.1%
  • Universal Platform-Best for logistics.

    Votes: 61 17.9%

  • Total voters
    341

hest

New Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
568
Likes
56

asianobserve

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
May 5, 2011
Messages
12,846
Likes
8,558
Country flag
Apparently temporal inclination for wheeled vehicles and their supposed advantages is ceasing even in US, one of their initiators and they are back with tracked plattforms.

Meanwhile, Russia is hugging them belatedly...

Italian Centauro wheeled IFV for Russia
 

Akim

New Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
10,353
Likes
8,645
Country flag
Meanwhile, Russia is hugging them belatedly...

Italian Centauro wheeled IFV for Russia
This decision was accepted by the group of persons, badly understanding an army. Russia does a rate not only on the wheeled but also on tracked platforms.
 

Damian

New Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2011
Messages
4,836
Likes
2,202
Interesting that the British still operate rifled gun, which seems backwardness as it does not allow unification with rest of NATO and offers worse characteristics even than older short L/44 smoothbore.

Of course Britain is not on same level as Germany, France, US...
British Army wanted to rearm Challenger 2 with U55 gun that was an Rh-120/L55 with bore evacuator and thermal sleeve of L30A1 gun used currently in Challenger 2.

The rearming phase of the upgrade program went smooth, but after initial tests they discovered a problem with ammunition storage inside a tank, Challenger 2 use similiar ammo storage scheme as it's predecessors Challenger 1 and Chieftain for 3 piece ammunition (separate projectile, propelant charge and primer), and storing NATO standard ammunition was immposible to be perform ergonomically and in useable way without serious turret and hull redesign.

Due to financial cuts British army back then resigned from rearming Challenger 2, because they anticipated that they will withdraw all of them from service, in fact 50 tanks were withdrawn from service, cut in to pieces and scrapped.

But because currently after Iraq and Afghanistan experiences where lightly armored vehicles proved to be insufficent and vurnable, British Army changed mind and is currently preparind MLU (Mid Life Upgrade) program for Challenger 2 tanks fleet. Details are unknown but we can speculate that upgraded Challenger 2 might be closer to Challenger 2E with new powerpack, different FCS, and perhaps redesigned interior of the hull and turret so use of a smoothbore gun will be possible.
 

militarysta

New Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2011
Messages
2,110
Likes
789
Akim, quick question -how many tanks and what type have Ukrainian Armed Forces.
I read White Book from 2011, 2010 and 2009 but apart infos about 780 tanks I didn't find how many types have Ukrainia.
Can You help?


-------------------------------------------------------
Simillar dates about modern or operational tanks in Russia:
-210 T-90A (Ob.188A1/A2)
-130 T-90 (Ob.188)
-220 T-72BA (Ob.184A/A1)
-450 T-80U (Ob.219)
+
200 modernisated T-72B (Ob.184) to standard T-72BA1 (Ob.184A1/A2?) +15 new T-90A soon.

Whole: about 1000 operatonal tank and in future (1-2 years) about 200 T-72BA1. Of course on modern western level they are only T-90A... becouse whole rest is on more or less on Leopard-2A4 level, or M1A1...

BTW: of course there is about 2000 other tanks in russian "service" on stock, junkyard, etc. But those tanks can't be taken seriously...
 

Akim

New Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
10,353
Likes
8,645
Country flag
Akim, quick question -how many tanks and what type have Ukrainian Armed Forces.
I read White Book from 2011, 2010 and 2009 but apart infos about 780 tanks I didn't find how many types have Ukrainia.
Can You help? .
This number is approximately correct. Mainly it is tanks of T-64BV. In Ukraine, three armored brigades, which are armed with more than 320 tanks. One brigade is manned by the tanks of BM Bulat. The other two brigades are armed with T-64BV. There are cropped tank regiment (in reserve) of tanks T-80 (different modifications). 10 mechanized brigades have more than 300 tanks. Artillery regiments and brigades are still about 120 tanks and more than 50 tanks in the coastal defense forces. Practically on all tanks T-64 (80) ERA "Konakt-1" is replaced by "Kontakt-5." But please note - this is only tanks that are in combat units. In general in Ukraine only tanks T-64 series, (in different state) over 2500. To sell she them does not can.
 

militarysta

New Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2011
Messages
2,110
Likes
789
This number is approximately correct. Mainly it is tanks of T-64BV. In Ukraine, three armored brigades, which are armed with more than 320 tanks. One brigade is manned by the tanks of BM Bulat. The other two brigades are armed with T-64BV. There are cropped tank regiment (in reserve) of tanks T-80 (different modifications). 10 mechanized brigades have more than 300 tanks. Artillery regiments and brigades are still about 120 tanks and more than 50 tanks in the coastal defense forces. Practically on all tanks T-64 (80) ERA "Konakt-1" is replaced by "Kontakt-5." But please note - this is only tanks that are in combat units. In general in Ukraine only tanks T-64 series, (in different state) over 2500. To sell she them does not can.
So in servise there is more or less:
~120 BM Bulat
~200 T-64BV ( three armored brig) + 300 T-64 (ten mech bde.) + 120 T-64 (art.reg and brig)+ 50 (costal def.)
So whole:
~120 BM Bulat
~670 T-64BV in all series
?

all in service ~800 tanks? + many many in stocks
 
Last edited:

militarysta

New Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2011
Messages
2,110
Likes
789
For compare "Polish Armored and Mechanized Forces" (Polskie Wojska Pancrne i Zmechanizowane)
in theory had:
351 T-72,
232 PT-91,
128 Leopard 2,
whole: 711 tanks in service

In fact in operational "A" status is:
116 Leopard-2A4 +10% in reserve
196 PT-91 + reserve
~240 T-72 (more or less )

btw -good article about "Batalion zmechanizowany i zmotoryzowany - ewolucja struktur " (Mechanized and Motorized Brigades - evolution of structures)
Batalion zmechanizowany i zmotoryzowany - ewolucja struktur - DziennikZbrojny.pl
 

militarysta

New Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2011
Messages
2,110
Likes
789
@UP
Why you post here smth without any one reson? It's rubbish post in that topic. It's nonsens to postsmthink like this.
Moderate should delate that post, and other rubbish post here.
 

hest

New Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
568
Likes
56
British Army wanted to rearm Challenger 2 with U55 gun that was an Rh-120/L55 with bore evacuator and thermal sleeve of L30A1 gun used currently in Challenger 2.

The rearming phase of the upgrade program went smooth, but after initial tests they discovered a problem with ammunition storage inside a tank, Challenger 2 use similiar ammo storage scheme as it's predecessors Challenger 1 and Chieftain for 3 piece ammunition (separate projectile, propelant charge and primer), and storing NATO standard ammunition was immposible to be perform ergonomically and in useable way without serious turret and hull redesign.
On it's origins it was understandable, they had opportunity with Challenger 2 which was developed recently but they still remained with rifled gun. Maybe Britain has no longer need for tanks which is logical, so it is not worth to expect more than simple refurbishment, maintainance work.

Also I believe production facility was closed.

Simillar dates about modern or operational tanks in Russia:
-210 T-90A (Ob.188A1/A2)
-130 T-90 (Ob.188)
-220 T-72BA (Ob.184A/A1)
-450 T-80U (Ob.219)
+
200 modernisated T-72B (Ob.184) to standard T-72BA1 (Ob.184A1/A2?) +15 new T-90A soon.

Whole: about 1000 operatonal tank and in future (1-2 years) about 200 T-72BA1. Of course on modern western level they are only T-90A... becouse whole rest is on more or less on Leopard-2A4 level, or M1A1...
With addition of T-80 variants (mostly T-80BV) there are about 2000 in active service.

There are no new T-90A since 2011, that year purchase was supposed to cease but a last batch was produced if I am correct.

About modernised T-72B, there are several variants known as "T-72BA" purchased before 2011. Since 2011 there is T-72B1 modernisation (BA is not official) which is uniform as you know, contract was signed for 3 years (2011-2013) for about 300 tanks, now there are > 100 T-72B1 and ongoing.

There are contracts as well for T-72B2 (no details) for 2015.

For 2015-2020 period official plan is:
UVZ to operate new production facility

2300 Armata tanks

Further modernisation of T-72B, work will reportedly shift to Omsk.


BTW: of course there is about 2000 other tanks in russian "service" on stock, junkyard, etc. But those tanks can't be taken seriously...
Recently there were in service 20000, then reduced to half (mostly T-55, T-62, T-64... early tanks). Now structure is active service of 2000, and rest reserve required to be about 8000-9000. After 2020 all permanent readiness units should be with Armata and rest 5500 T-90, modernised T-72B.
 

militarysta

New Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2011
Messages
2,110
Likes
789
With addition of T-80 variants (mostly T-80BV) there are about 2000 in active service.
How many is T-80BW? In fact modern tanks number is around 1000...



About modernised T-72B, there are several variants known as "T-72BA" purchased before 2011. Since 2011 there is T-72B1 modernisation (BA is not official) which is uniform as you know, contract was signed for 3 years (2011-2013) for about 300 tanks, now there are > 100 T-72B1 and ongoing.
Hold a second -as I know T-72BA (Ob.184A1) is in 220 numbers. And whit Sosna-U main sight less then 60 tanks. Those tanks where produced in last decade.
Can you give source about 300 new T-72BA2 in next 3 years?




For 2015-2020 period official plan is:
UVZ to operate new production facility

2300 Armata tanks
"Imposiblu" :) Impossible -take look about UVZ cheper and simpler T-90A (Ob.188A/A1) production. In best years it was 180 tanks per yer. Even If Armata will be ended "on time" (2015) -what is not so sure when we take a look in other russian military program... - then starting production need time. In fact the most optymistic possibility is ~500 new tanks in 2020. Propably mucht less...
IMHO Amrmata wil be ended whit 1-2 years later then it planed now.
 

Damian

New Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2011
Messages
4,836
Likes
2,202
On it's origins it was understandable, they had opportunity with Challenger 2 which was developed recently but they still remained with rifled gun. Maybe Britain has no longer need for tanks which is logical, so it is not worth to expect more than simple refurbishment, maintainance work.

Also I believe production facility was closed.
Challenger 2 was not exactly their first choice. Original competition for new tank was won by M1A1 and in the long term British Army wanted improved M1A2, however prime minister Thatcher forced British Army to "reconsider" their choice and in the end support own industry. However VDS did not really designed a completely new tank, Challenger 2 in it's basics is just slightly redesigned Challenger 1 hull and completely new turret.

As for Challenger 2 MLU upgrade, details are not known.

As for manufacturing facility, one of several such facilities were closed, not all, there were several of these capable to manufacture heavy tracked vehicles. Because currently after experience from iraq and Afghanistan, British Army as well as US Army, reconsiders it's earlier plans and decides to keep tanks, probably BAe that currently holds rights to Challenger 2 design, can reopen one of the facilities or use one of other ROF's. Also British Army have capabilities to perform upgrades in their units workshops, similiar to the US Army/USMC Anniston Army Depot that is nothing more than military maintnance, repair and modernization facility that closely cooperates with General Dynamics Land Systems, BAe, and Joint Systems Manufacturing Center.
 

hest

New Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
568
Likes
56
How many is T-80BW? In fact modern tanks number is around 1000...
There were several thousands of different T-80, now I haven't a list of current formations (how many of them are active and in reserve), but there are many units with BV, recently also in Kuril islands.

All currently active units, T-90A, T-90, modernised T-72B, T-72B and T-80 variants make up about 2000, that is not counting tanks in storage.


Hold a second -as I know T-72BA (Ob.184A1) is in 220 numbers. And whit Sosna-U main sight less then 60 tanks. Those tanks where produced in last decade.
Can you give source about 300 new T-72BA2 in next 3 years?
"T-72BA" was purchased before 2011 and there were different variants of modernisation, I do not know exact number, maybe about 100.

Contract for T-72B1 (Sosna-U, 2A46-M5...), which is not named T-72BA, was signed on march 2011 but details were not officially disclosed. According to reports it is about 100 for 3 years, indeed http://www.rosoboronpostavka.ru/documents/pg_mo_2013_1.pdf second year contract (2012-2013) for 2013 is for 101 tanks, now first year tanks should be already delivered in 2011-2012, about 100.

"Imposiblu" :) Impossible -take look about UVZ cheper and simpler T-90A (Ob.188A/A1) production. In best years it was 180 tanks per yer. Even If Armata will be ended "on time" (2015) -what is not so sure when we take a look in other russian military program... - then starting production need time. In fact the most optymistic possibility is ~500 new tanks in 2020. Propably mucht less...
IMHO Amrmata wil be ended whit 1-2 years later then it planed now.
Though I am skeptical, 460 tanks per year is possible. T-90A orders were under the capacity of the plant and there were many more including export and modernisations. Also UVZ since 2015 will operate new production facility currently under construction and will focus on new production, it will no longer be dedicated to T-72B upgrade which should shift to Omsk.

Because current T-72 upgrade contracts are not very rentable and are being ordered only to save capacity.

Also Armata is result of 2 decades of developement, ob 195 and most is already available, they are to show prototype on 2013, pass trials on 2014 and ready for production.
 
Last edited:

hest

New Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
568
Likes
56
Challenger 2 was not exactly their first choice. Original competition for new tank was won by M1A1 and in the long term British Army wanted improved M1A2, however prime minister Thatcher forced British Army to "reconsider" their choice and in the end support own industry. However VDS did not really designed a completely new tank, Challenger 2 in it's basics is just slightly redesigned Challenger 1 hull and completely new turret.
Challenger 2 is complete redesign, they had opportunity, but remained with rifled gun for few yaers later to aknowledge the problem.

As for Challenger 2 MLU upgrade, details are not known.

As for manufacturing facility, one of several such facilities were closed, not all, there were several of these capable to manufacture heavy tracked vehicles. Because currently after experience from iraq and Afghanistan, British Army as well as US Army, reconsiders it's earlier plans and decides to keep tanks, probably BAe that currently holds rights to Challenger 2 design, can reopen one of the facilities or use one of other ROF's. Also British Army have capabilities to perform upgrades in their units workshops, similiar to the US Army/USMC Anniston Army Depot that is nothing more than military maintnance, repair and modernization facility that closely cooperates with General Dynamics Land Systems, BAe, and Joint Systems Manufacturing Center.
Main facility was indeed closed and with budget reduction there probably won't be anything than repair, hardly significant modernisation.
 

militarysta

New Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2011
Messages
2,110
Likes
789
There were several thousands of different T-80, now I haven't a list of current formations (how many of them are active and in reserve), but there are many units with BV, recently also in Kuril islands.

All currently active units, T-90A, T-90, modernised T-72B, T-72B and T-80 variants make up about 2000, that is not counting tanks in storage.
As I know operational status of T-80BV is far far from perfect. What is funny - rebuild T-80U wher sent to east near China region and...stored in "A" reserve (450 tanks) unit them are using T-80BV and T-72B and as I remember whole idea is to change in case war or danger thos tnak on new and fresh T-80U and old tanks (T-80BV and T-72B) will be sent for mobilisated reserve units. No idea chow close to truth is that. Info from second hand. But if You want count whole quite modern or modernisated tanks in Russian then value is pretty close to 1200 tanks + 2000 T-72B (and clones) and T-80BV. And those tank status is...far from perfect.



"T-72BA" was purchased before 2011 and there were different variants of modernisation, I do not know exact number, maybe about 100.

Contract for T-72B1 (Sosna-U, 2A46-M5...), which is not named T-72BA, was signed on march 2011 but details were not officially disclosed. According to reports it is about 100 for 3 years, indeed http://www.rosoboronpostavka.ru/documents/pg_mo_2013_1.pdf second year contract (2012-2013) for 2013 is for 101 tanks, now first year tanks should be already delivered in 2011-2012, about 100.
Im preatty sure those 220 tanks in few diffrent series. Of course scale of modernisation wkas diffrent and onlu last tow batch where closer to normal "T-72BA"standard, but as I said - Im preatty sure those 220 tanks. And only ~60 have Sosna-U. And As I understand those year and 2013 will be end whit new ~200 T-72BA.
So in 2013/2014 they will be about 420 T-72BA/BA1 tanks in service.


btw:
which is not named T-72BA
184 - основной танк Т-72Б (с КУВ 9К120)
184-1 - основной танк Т-72Б1 (без КУВ)

184А - основной танк Т-72БА
184А1 - основной танк Т-72БА1

:)
 

Damian

New Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2011
Messages
4,836
Likes
2,202
Challenger 2 is complete redesign, they had opportunity, but remained with rifled gun for few yaers later to aknowledge the problem.
Maybe instead of talking about complete redesign, first read some books written by British authors. Hull is just slightly redesigned Challenger 1 hull, and turret is completely new because Challenger 1 turret was in fact slightly redesigned Chieftain turret with composite armor.

Main facility was indeed closed and with budget reduction there probably won't be anything than repair, hardly significant modernisation.
Not main facility because in UK there is no such thing as main facility, there are ROF's or Royal Ordnance Factories, there were many different facilities of such types, at least two or three of them dedicated for AFV's manufacturing.

The biggest ones ROF Leeds and ROF Notthingham were closed but at least from ROF Notthingham whole manufacturing equippment was moved by BAe to different facility in Barrow-In-Furness, Cumbria.
 

hest

New Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
568
Likes
56
As I know operational status of T-80BV is far far from perfect. What is funny - rebuild T-80U wher sent to east near China region and...stored in "A" reserve (450 tanks) unit them are using T-80BV and T-72B and as I remember whole idea is to change in case war or danger thos tnak on new and fresh T-80U and old tanks (T-80BV and T-72B) will be sent for mobilisated reserve units. No idea chow close to truth is that. Info from second hand. But if You want count whole quite modern or modernisated tanks in Russian then value is pretty close to 1200 tanks + 2000 T-72B (and clones) and T-80BV. And those tank status is...far from perfect.
Sometimes it is difficult to say which one is active or not. After army reform and creation of brigades under new structure there are units of "permanent readiness" which make 2000 tanks, another active and mobilisation reserve.

Of course most are T-72B, T-80 without modernisation.



Im preatty sure those 220 tanks in few diffrent series. Of course scale of modernisation wkas diffrent and onlu last tow batch where closer to normal "T-72BA"standard, but as I said - Im preatty sure those 220 tanks. And only ~60 have Sosna-U. And As I understand those year and 2013 will be end whit new ~200 T-72BA.
So in 2013/2014 they will be about 420 T-72BA/BA1 tanks in service.
Known as T-72BA, it started in 90s and there were different variants, some close to just repair, some better. Since 2011 modernised T-72B are uniform with standart.

That number of 60 was probably given while delivery was still ongoing and before contract for 2011-2012 was finished. For 2012-2013 additional 101 and probably similar number for 2013-2014, should be about 300 overall.

These tanks are officially designated as T-72B1, not T-72BA. As of T-72BA before 2011 I even doubt that any batch had Sosna-U sight.


btw:

184 - основной танк Т-72Б (с КУВ 9К120)
184-1 - основной танк Т-72Б1 (без КУВ)

184А - основной танк Т-72БА
184А1 - основной танк Т-72БА1

:)
T-72BA as said is old and there were many different versions and designations, some even common for different periods

Танк Т-72БА – описание, фоторепортаж и фотодетализация � � Военно-патриотический сайт «Отвага» Военно-патриотический сайт «Отвага»

As seen in official document, modernises T-72 since 2011 are designated T-72B1.

When counting numbers, you should not mix T-72BA which is broad designation and of which exist many different variants with T-72B1 which is a standart and on better technical level.
 
Last edited:

Damian

New Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2011
Messages
4,836
Likes
2,202
T-72BA and T-72B1 issues are just typical mess in Russian terminology.

In 1980's there was T-72B and T-72B1, T-72B1 back then was a simplified variant without 9K120 GLATGM system.

Currently "new" T-72B1 is just there to sort out things with T-72B2, so there will be mix of less advanced T-72B1 and more advanced T-72B2, where new T-72B1 will not have anything in common with old T-72B1.

But seriously, they really can't simplify designation codes?
 

Articles

Top