Sorry but where is SP28 ? Its just the jig.View attachment 37762
Sp28 in jig...
Means foc sp8....
...,................................
Front fuelsage......
This is age old news.................................................In what would break new ground, India has started work on developing an unmanned combat version of the home-grown light combat aircraft (LCA), with a task group being constituted to study how to convert the fighter for a futuristic role.
Dr. Girish Shantaram Deodhare who is Director of Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA) has confirmed to Indian media that after Final Operational Clearance (FOC) is granted to Tejas Mark-1 by this July, ADA has been cleared by Government of India (GOI) to commence work on the development of Unmanned Tejas.
https://defenceupdate.in/tejas-ucav-indias-unmanned-fighter-jet-of-the-future-cleared/
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
... and unless our is autonomous, in an actual combat situation, data link to it is going to be jammed & lost.This is age old news.................................................
They only enter that display info when the structure is on the jig. So SP28 is on the jig which means at least SP21-28 are all under some form of completion which is promising.Sorry but where is SP28 ? Its just the jig.
They may be able to produce a squadron a year if both assemble lines are active (SP 21-28 presently in jigs).24 MK1s remaining (16 FOC+8 trainers) then MK1A production by....? MK2 is meant to be in production come 2025/6 so HAL will have only 3-4 years to make 83 MK1A.
I don’t see the line going idle. As soon as the MK1s are complete MK1A will be produced, I can see HAL commencing production using internal funds even if the IAF hasn’t formally signed a contract by then.They may be able to produce a squadron a year if both assemble lines are active (SP 21-28 presently in jigs).
But what's more important issue is no follow up order by IAF for Tejas FOC. Mark 1A is scheduled for series production only by 2021-22 & they're complaining about the pricing, but not ordering FOC either.
It's still better than all the Migs & Mirages we have & the lines risk sitting idle.
That guy's a pretty big bullshitter - and arrogant to top it off; his constant back-and-forth with a user called randomradio at one or two other forums was the stuff of legend.I see that @Sancho continues to peddle his half-truths as gospel all over Twitter.
I have a lot of respect for him but just think it’s unnecessary and rather rude to be arguing with such a senior individual with actual inside information and expertise in such a public forum.I see that @Sancho continues to peddle his half-truths as gospel all over Twitter.
Sancho's entire theme has been two pronged- pushing for EF for MRCA requirement and Gripen for SE requirement. Hence his relentless, propaganda efforts directed at vilifying Rafale and Tejas. Much objectivity is sacrificed in the process.I have a lot of respect for him but just think it’s unnecessary and rather rude to be arguing with such a senior individual with actual inside information and expertise in such a public forum.
Also, and maybe he can explain, but i don’t understand the argument? How have ADA even changed their story? They’ve not deviated away from their initial projections vis a vis the MK2/MWF.
There's already a lot of 'autonomy' built into Tejas - even today the pilot has set the bearing, altitude, speed etc and then take a nap....the auto-pilot will maintain the flight independently. Building more autonomy via waypoints and some 'decision trees' is not that difficult.... and unless our is autonomous, in an actual combat situation, data link to it is going to be jammed & lost.
New asqr doesn't mean complete deviation from original asqr ,speed,acceleration ,g,may be as it is from the older one..........I have a lot of respect for him but just think it’s unnecessary and rather rude to be arguing with such a senior individual with actual inside information and expertise in such a public forum.
Also, and maybe he can explain, but i don’t understand the argument? How have ADA even changed their story? They’ve not deviated away from their initial projections vis a vis the MK2/MWF.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
LCA Tejas: Photos & Footages (no text other than headings) | Military Multimedia | 87 | ||
LCA TEJAS and what makes it stand out | Knowledge Repository | 8 | ||
W | Rise of LCA Tejas Multi Role Fighter Aircraft | Indian Air Force | 23 | |
C | LRUs or parts of LCA Tejas Made and designed in India | Indian Air Force | 16 |