LCA TEJAS MK1 & MK1A: News and Discussion

omaebakabaka

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2020
Messages
4,945
Likes
13,833
Yepp that's really big if true
Those do happen for bunch of reasons including negligence intentional or unintentionally or being sloppy. One incident is not enough to cause consipiracy theories....however IAF top level is bs and never seem to address significant downgrade in lot of aspects not to mention roadmap and staying on it....but hard to say, drdo and other related orgs may have gotten good at marketing and underlying weak spots remain while calling everything indigenous....
 

Azaad

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2022
Messages
7,358
Likes
27,593
Country flag
Landing gears was down and gliding was stable.

View attachment 244003


Jet was just 5 km away from landing strip. Jet was already slowing down for landing. Jet was gliding and might have experienced thrust issues.

So it looks like with no altitude and speed the pilot couldn't glide it farther and it crashed and the pilot ejected before that.
According to an ex member of this forum , currently on another forum & former Naval pilot , known by the handle Decklander out here , prima facie this seems to be a case of engine failure going by the video of the Tejas gliding & descending smoothly on its way to a landing.
 

Bleh

Laughing member
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2017
Messages
6,215
Likes
26,021
Country flag
Only once, IAF has accepted pilot mistake for any jet crash where they switched off FBW of a Su-30mki.
Tu ku6 bhi bol dene ka adat thoda kam kar 🫤

Ray-ban gang is famous for crashing brand new jets & it's also possible that the maintenance teams on ground are of inferior quality than HAL test-crews, who may have done a shoddy job (I know since people, very sarkari attitude).
 

Chinmoy

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2015
Messages
8,829
Likes
22,917
Country flag
Let's see what comes up, probe has been ordered. Flight data recorder will explain..
Sudden engine power loss before landing(5 km away) does seems sabotage.
In that case, nearly 100+ flights got sabotaged till date as landing is considered the most difficult aspect in whole flight duration.
 

NoobWannaLearn

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2022
Messages
8,166
Likes
26,645
Country flag
Those do happen for bunch of reasons including negligence intentional or unintentionally or being sloppy. One incident is not enough to cause consipiracy theories....however IAF top level is bs and never seem to address significant downgrade in lot of aspects not to mention roadmap and staying on it....but hard to say, drdo and other related orgs may have gotten good at marketing and underlying weak spots remain while calling everything indigenous....
Yea I just said if as the reports suggests it might be bigger problem hence I am a firm believer to wait for court of inquiry
 

lcafanboy

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2013
Messages
5,845
Likes
37,617
Country flag

Cheepek

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2021
Messages
4,050
Likes
30,870

lcafanboy

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2013
Messages
5,845
Likes
37,617
Country flag

Apparently the much touted safest fighter engine GE 404 that failed. What is astonishing is LCA stabilized due to excellent FBW system that recovered Tejas and was flying gliding to land....😳

Exactly what I was thinking about and said. LCA Tejas has one of the best FBW system & excellent accident prevention system in the world. Even after engine failure Tejas didn't simply drop on the ground like other fighters drop like a stone but the FBW & accident prevention system were activated & made Tejas stable and was flying effortlessly even without a pilot input but since engine was shut and aircraft was powerless it began to descend and finally crashed. Had it been a plane land it would have landed on ground maybe with some bruises...
 

Zoid Raptor

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2019
Messages
402
Likes
1,457
Country flag
Pilot knows what consequences he will face if he intentionally ejects..
It is not like that you will eject and authorities won't know about it. There are flight data recorder as well as aircraft must be informing to the base station that pilot has ejected.
After 23 years and when the war exercise was going on and they put their lives in danger on such a low altitude on glide path.... Are you sane enough....
If DRDO scientists, HAL engineers and several folks employed in critical establishments are selling or simply giving out confidential info for bobs vagene pics or NATO pilots and SOF members training chinkis for $$$$, why do y'all think this isn't possible?

Do you think chinese stole all those highly confidential tech from western defense firms and research entities without paying and planting moles!!

Some of these folks hired by CCP are well aware of the risks, tracking mechanisms employed by their respective orgs but still end up doing it for a multitude of reasons from money, promise of a better life abroad, women and the likes
 

brat4

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2022
Messages
196
Likes
1,094
Country flag
@Zoid Raptor while you may be right (given there is always a non zero probability for anything), going that route right now seems a knee jerk reaction bordering on dhoti shivering.
LCA is still a new aircraft - that seems the most reasonable explanation?
 

ezsasa

Designated Cynic
Mod
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
32,112
Likes
148,960
Country flag

Apparently the much touted safest fighter engine GE 404 that failed. What is astonishing is LCA stabilized due to excellent FBW system that recovered Tejas and was flying gliding to land....😳
can sand ingestion be a factor? , the jet must have been doing low passes in preparation for the exercises in pokhran. from visuals it was not clear if there is difference in altitude the fighter jets flew between vayu shakti last month and Bharat shakti now.
 

Zoid Raptor

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2019
Messages
402
Likes
1,457
Country flag
@Zoid Raptor while you may be right (given there is always a non zero probability for anything), going that route right now seems a knee jerk reaction bordering on dhoti shivering.
LCA is still a new aircraft - that seems the most reasonable explanation?
I'm not saying that's the only possibility but something that we shouldn't rule out. The likelihood to fall prey for espionage is significantly higher for a population and society like ours
 

spacemarine2023

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2023
Messages
1,109
Likes
4,379
Country flag
I'm not saying that's the only possibility but something that we shouldn't rule out. The likelihood to fall prey for espionage is significantly higher for a population and society like ours
other than fuel mixture sabotage I dont see other possible for gradual power loss in engine.

any other component will alarm the pilot before even taking off…

Other issue could be ingestion of FOC
 

daya

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2019
Messages
782
Likes
1,826
Country flag
Tu ku6 bhi bol dene ka adat thoda kam kar 🫤

Ray-ban gang is famous for crashing brand new jets & it's also possible that the maintenance teams on ground are of inferior quality than HAL test-crews, who may have done a shoddy job (I know since people, very sarkari attitude).
I've always said that the service conditions of technical crew (of lower ranks) are not good enough. This must be looked into. They(lower cadre) are very important but not ignored one.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top