sakalasiva
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2020
- Messages
- 58
- Likes
- 115
Why everyone forgetting the fact that kickbacks by defence lobbies for defence orders. Since HAL is a public sector company they can't indulge in kickbacks. Only practical reason I see for selecting fa50 over Tejas which is superior than fa50 in any count. One other reason may be cheap Price if news is true that price is 3.2 million than Tejas which is offered for 3.7 million.SH never flown from an operational STOBAR carrier. Rafale-M can't even fold its wings. Both are experimental w.r.t. INS Vikrant.
MiG-29K was something IN paid to develop, meaning it was an experimental aircraft when it was purchased by IN. Same with Su-30MKI that didn't have canards when IAF asked for it and bought it.
This nonsense about "experimental designs" is unwarranted. Malaysians are free to go for MiG-29 if they want "operational aircraft only".
.
None of the offerings that fit Malaysian requirements are "finished products". Deal with it. We don't got to put down Tejas because its not "finished". Currently, its far more mature than the FA-50.