None have a better safety record.How does that number hold up from aircrafts from elsewhere
Read about accidents of f16 f18
None have a better safety record.How does that number hold up from aircrafts from elsewhere
2017 article which was debunked..Documents accessed by India Today reveal that the IAF has told the government that the "endurance" of Tejas in combat is just about 59 minutes as against 3 hours of Gripen and nearly 4 fours for the F-16. Also, Tejas can carry a pay-load of about three tons against nearly six tons and seven tons by the Gripen and F-16 respectively.
Tejas far behind competitors, not enough to protect Indian skies: IAF
The IAF made a presentation to the government to explain why Tejas alone can't meet India's requirements.www.indiatoday.in
What is this porkies keep spamming?
Cost we pay for being a " DEMOCRACY".I read they are lying about everything in the article about endurance payload etc
How is this allowed people would have been killed in China and pak for this
Why go to that forum in the first place?? Leave those pigs with their own masters3rd ban?
I am on my 102th Ban - Take the bans as badge of honor;
Thru facts.What is this how do I counter porkies on twitter for this
Yeah this is the one I was talking about @Abdus Salem killed .First to be clear, i fully agree with galaxy fighter goat enthusiasts. Still if u want to reply, try reading a lot as all things mentioned in that article is BS. Just one link for u to start with. There r enough available.
There is an entire ecosystem based on fake news and false narratives.I read they are lying about everything in the article about endurance payload etc
How is this allowed people would have been killed in China and pak for this
Mirage2000
Best rebuke to these party poopers will be to allow Mk1A into MRFA, it is as multi role as they come- and announce it as final winner on LCC/TCO (Life Cycle Costs/Total Cost of Ownership) and build another 114 of these for a total of 237 next in number only to the mighty MKIs! That will save us tons of money & give us an hour glass shaped airforce with a heavy top, heavy bottom and an anemic middle. That situation will improve with the arrival of Mk2 & AMCA.Ya'll Nibbiars DFI just declared War on the Fake Media.
Ya'll Nibbiars then make a pictographs will post it's.Best rebuke to these party poopers will be to allow Mk1A into MRFA- and announce it as final winner on LCC/TCO (Life Cycle Costs/Total Cost of Ownership) and build another 114 of these for a total of 237 next in number only to the mighty MKIs! That will save us tons of money & give us an hour glass shaped airforce with a heavy top, heavy bottom and an anemic middle. That situation will improve with the arrival of Mk2 & AMCA.
Only if made by that lazy company HAL.Rafale F4 ~8-900crs/plane (off the shelf prices, MII price will be 2-3x because factory costs have to be amortized)
Just crazy to compare the 2 birds. The spec are very differents, so is the cost.Rafale F4 ~8-900crs/plane (off the shelf prices, MII price will be 2-3x because factory costs have to be amortized)
Tejas Mk1A ~300crs/plane (will go down with Uttam AESAR and and economies of scale from an even bigger order)
Of course different capabilities- but Mk1A offers ~60-70% Rafale at ~30% cost. If you have any idea of the Indian automotive sector- then it is similar to Maruti Suzuki Ertiga vs Toyota Innova Crysta.Just crazy to compare the 2 birds. The spec are very differents, so is the cost.
I was thinking, should india use m88 in tejas?Of course different capabilities- but Mk1A offers ~60-70% Rafale at ~30% cost. If you have any idea of the Indian automotive sector- then it is similar to Maruti Suzuki Ertiga vs Toyota Innova Crysta.
So Rafale may be purchased in staggered blocks of 36 off the shelf to create the diamond tip of the spear, while large numbers of Mk1A form the long golden pole. In any case by the time MRFA long winds it's way to a winner, Mk2 will be online & will bridge the capability gap even further with Rafale and may even surpass it, fingers crossed- it has better engines for a start.
Methinks, Safran should offer full ToT & know-why (rather than just know-how) for M88 at a reasonable cost (from Indian PoV) as well as work on putting M88-4 through its paces in tropical Indian climes (power drops 20% over cooler Europe) so as to get its foot in the door for the giant jet engine market that has to serve LCA iterations, TEDBF & AMCA besides Indian Rafales.
It will have to be modified for single engine use- redundant controls etc. but certainly in the realm of possibility.I was thinking, should india use m88 in tejas?
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
LCA Tejas: Photos & Footages (no text other than headings) | Military Multimedia | 87 | ||
LCA TEJAS and what makes it stand out | Knowledge Repository | 8 | ||
W | Rise of LCA Tejas Multi Role Fighter Aircraft | Indian Air Force | 23 | |
C | LRUs or parts of LCA Tejas Made and designed in India | Indian Air Force | 16 |