Problem with Russian missiles is serviceability and maintenance .
Indian procurement is crap they imported Soviet era missiles from multiple countries in different batches. Hence the imported stocks had lot of problems. Plus no thought was given to invest in supporting the testing , servicing and maintenance of the stocks.
Missing a flare is not that of a problem because the proximity detonation mechanism fails to be initiated by a very small sized target .
Target drones generally tow a flare so the reason to fail to detonate could be the same as above.
Western missiles of corresponding generation too will have the same problems more or less.
But all said and done this cannot be used as a excuse . Every weapon needs to be upgraded to retain its viability.
And than the said F16 was a poor bait lol because I remember seeing a video on twitter with the Mig 21 chasing the F16 at almost tree top heights.
The reason why the mig 21 got hit was because
His wing man was missing from the fight , nobody was there to cover his tail. While the F16 has cover from multiple F16s in the periphery.
The Mig 21 ended right among the enemies , IMO he should have broken off as nobody was there to cover him . Atleast 4 indian fighters should have entered the fight to make a good show .
IAF was it fault , it was out witted by PAF tactically .
Indian military mindset of senior officers is like that of a donkey , they always follow the trodden path . No capacity or will to innovate . ( Except for navy to some extent ) . This can still be seen in their British era mindset in the name of pig shit traditions , which they are yet to loose even after 70 years of independence.
Bro, with respect to the wingman, he and Wg. cdr Varthaman were asked to return back as they were heading into territory which was held by a numerically stronger adversary. Our lack of secure communication on mig-21's as well as the enemy jamming led to Varthaman's mig-21 not able to hear this command while the other pilot did. The other pilot had another missile fired at him which missed him as his was a receding target.
Yes, no two opinions about some rigid traditions and that we have managed to tie us spectacularly into knots wrt broken procurement policies.
As an aside and offtopic, one of the Pakistani F-16's panicked after the Sukhoi's stayed put with the mirages holding their own. He reported issues with oxygen and called it a day. They were also terrified of the Mirages and did there best to keep away from it.
The fact that they had to send their best, the F-16's at the Sukhoi's, rippling off AMRAAM's at the two planes, SOP's be damned tells us something about the Sukhois'. Multiple 16's Vs 2 MKI's. Multiple launches at the MKI's. The MKI pilots dodge it, go hot, go cold and still remain in the air while reinforcements come in, with the single minded focus on preventing the enemy strike force from their objectives tells so many things, notably fire discipline. Despite being numerically inferior in that sector, we were not rippling off our R-77's. What is left unsaid is even if we had fired them off like the pakistanis have, there would have been nothing to show off.
So yes, while the IAF could have been better placed with the timely introduction of secure comms, the PAF did not cover itself in glory either.
Panicked pilots launching off missiles, heading back home on first confrontation, launching guided munitions from afar and then desperately breaking off contact after being detected and consequently breaking off the guidance of their first generation SOW.
Things would have been interesting had their been casualties on our side on the ground. There would have been many a pakistani myths busted.