LOL. You guys behaving like you have won a battle with Pakistan by removing the Article 370 A.
Claims over Kashmir were today the very reason for aimless nation of Pakistan. Collapse of this cause will make Pakistan irrelevant.
Anyways, talking about it more to puke you guys. 370 is more of our internal political victory.
Shows how insecure you are that despite occupying the Kashmir with 700 K soldiers
Not exceeding 130k soldiers. Not even on entire Pakistani border and LoC. This 700K, 1M, 1.3M bs is propagated by idiots all over internet. India keeps lot of troops towards PRC and ready for mobilization on other fronts.
We don't have that much of troops to waste on weaker fronts. Lower troops than you but yeah, we deploy more firepower against you.
you feel like you have conquered the Kashmir by removing the article 370A.
Indeed we have. It was a nation between a nation who just used to get money for granted from nation and wasn't obligated to follow any other law.
That's what you can do atmost, Conquering and subjugating your own states.
We have done to others too multiple times, even yours. What India historically did and what is the size of Indian military is today will translate into more severe blows and invasions if India tries.
For various reasons today including this isn't that era, we just can't do without paying huge diplomatic costs.
That's what real democracy do. That's how they protest.
Which one? USA? Being a democracy has nothing to with how you "protest" or crying to international community. You can go ahead with your own resolve. There are plenty of authoritarian countries who cry at UNGA. In fact, even Pakistan is called a democracy by no one but Pakistanis themselves.
Crying to others is characteristic of weaker states in a conquest and not the system of government.
Not like some democracies who lockdown the entire valley and do something against the wishes of the people.
There are enough for people who support us there. A bunch of Islamists don't represent people.
Seriously, India is a federation, not a confederation where you can carve your own state. You are promised with fundamental rights and state perks to live with and not taking away a part of it altogether. Separatist movements in Kashmir aren't nationalist either. They are religiously motivated movements like Pakistan or Taliban.
No matter what your spinless establishment portrays, even emergency situation in Kashmir isn't literally "locked down". Neither any other country reports like that nor such a situation can be hidden from rest of people in a functional democracy.
To be noted, there is no other democracy like India in world who has to face world's biggest terror factories in immediate neighborhood and has solve its massive internal problems at same time.
Does India Have any claims on Balochistan ? Then why compare balochistan with Kashmir?
For proclaimed "atrocities".
Common sense dictates India did same annexations with Hyderabad and Junagarh. Forcefully occupied these lands to inculde them into Indian territory.
These lands were very much supposed to be part of India during independence. Just coz their nawabs didn't agree, India wouldn't have stopped. Just like these states don't have any insurgencies today, Kashmir too won't have in a decade.
Then there is an ongoing insurgencies in Nagaland, Assam.
Nearly collapsed some one or two years ago. Remains in Southeast India.
These cases are similar to balochistan. So listen to your own Indians first before worrying about Balochistan, no ?
Ours don't pose an existential threat for us. Yours do for you.
Why lecturing on moralities? We are clearly saying that we want to decimate your state.
And what has the largest Democracy did ? Locking the valley of kashmir and subjugating it's subjects at gunpoint ?
Freedom index disagrees. Reason being largest democracy announces everything.
