Barrage jamming of spectrum would mean even you cannot use the spectrum.
thats supposed to answer WHEN you going to use their radars??are you trying to say: NEVER???
It depends on how maneuverable missiles can be too.
theory is always in theory.....if in theory what guidance system do you think your missile will be using?? radar??IR seeker? cant be camare can it?...... then how to hit the stealth target in the first place using missiles when all the stealthy measures have been taken IN THEORY to avoid being traced??? you open the weapon bay you probably end up like the downed f-117 so better dont shoot the missile.......then thats the time when you have to think of using cannon.....shells dont have seekers...they just make their ways to the target.....so to aim or avoid being hit you need manuverbility......if you want to say It also depends on the strike range of your BVRAAM........well if its mainland vs taiwan.....i guess very often you dont have the chance to compare that..........
It doesn't matter who I am when he himself said his stealth assessment is bogus.
Anyway, Kopp believes the J-20 is bigger than F-111. He also says it is either an interceptor like the Mig-31 and will primarily deal with taking out support aircraft like AWACS and tankers or it is a strike aircraft which can load itself with LGBs to take out USN ships.
Chengdu J-XX [J-20] Stealth Fighter Prototype / A Preliminary Assessment
But we know that it is neither as big as the F-111 nor is it an interceptor like the Mig-31.
The article is pure imaginary speculation.
1 dont overstae it.....the assessment dosnt day ' J-20 is bigger than F-111'....it says '
The J-XX/J-20 is a large fighter, similar in size to an F-111.' ....
2 back then many were comparing F-111 and j-20 ''
The J-20's basic dimensions most closely match the F-111 bomber retired from service in the late 1990s.''http://thediplomat.com/flashpoints-blog/2011/07/26/stealth-fighter-or-bomber/...........can you therefore say just because one of your guess is wrong the whole artile or assessment is wrong??? '
What is known so far, though, is that given its size (an overall length of about 70 feet), the twin-engine J-20 will likely serve as a strike fighter, like the F-111 Aardvark, rather than as an air superiority fighter.'http://thediplomat.com/flashpoints-blog/2012/08/06/china-developing-a-2nd-stealth-fighter/.............so the diplomat is bogus right??.......
3 the russia shipbuilder also said it was chinese bricks that screwed up Vikramaditya last year which then turned out to be a joke then are you going to stop believing what ever they have to say in the future??
4 what role do you think j-20 is going to play in the future?? i dont know now for sure because no one offical there can tell me that but when you say others are wrong you must have some inside news about its role.....mind sharing me with some???
5 and the quotes i used from the assessment were good......not that i dont have issues with the radar like he claimed prc hadnt demonstrated AESA etc.............can you find one report that is totally right in military to evaluate weapons??? and how wrong is the length??? 20m 21m 22m??bigger than f-22 at least.......what a big deal???
6 the bottom line is i am not persuading anyone to believe anything here.....you like the report then read it....if you dont thats ok.....no need to make fuss about some ongoing project and act like you were the only one who knows everything...........if you are so correct why did you say '
his stealth assessment is bogus'............or '
Kopp believes.....' seriously the assessment was written by two men.....how can you be so sure it was kopp but not peter said that part??? just because kopp tends to have positive views on j-20 and negative views on PAKFA and probably on F-35 then he made all the indians enemy??? well.....when i brought up the assessment i ve expected someone like you to turn up to slam ......its a usual practice of indians in other forums.......
