shuvo@y2k10
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2010
- Messages
- 2,653
- Likes
- 6,710
Tab to Ram naam satya hoye gaya samajlo Sigs ka.OFB.
Tab to Ram naam satya hoye gaya samajlo Sigs ka.OFB.
mid range ar15 all day.Yeah, the bolt hold open tells you that your gun is empty. What if you're using an MP5 and it goes empty? You won't know till you pull the trigger and hear a click. I've discussed this on different threads before, so last from me on this.
What would you pick? High end AK with good ergonomics, like ACE or a mid range AR 15 style weapon, like an M4 SOPMOD Block 1 or 2? Just want to know. Other members are also welcome..
it might be better than the insas but that doesnt mean anything.Any news ki conform hai ki sena ak203 rifle nai Legi.
I was happy to jawans are getting something better than insas( thanks to ofb , DRDO apna kam kiya tha ofb botched up again )
Ak 203 is anyday better than insas
Well shrimaan , we are not buying those more reliable systems but ak 203 .it might be better than the insas but that doesnt mean anything.
the reality is there are far more reliable, ergonomic and modular weapons out there.
So would I. Primarily because of weight, cost and modularity.mid range ar15 all day.
INSAS can be modified. But army doesn't want to hear it.it might be better than the insas but that doesnt mean anything.
the reality is there are far more reliable, ergonomic and modular weapons out there.
I'm not quite getting the reactions. INSAS is way more ergonomic than even AK 12 series.. Even that Excalibur thing would be better than what we're getting...INSAS can be modified. But army doesn't want to hear it.
Ek hi to pig hai apna, kitna lipstick lagaoge bechare pe!INSAS can be modified. But army doesn't want to hear it.
Like I said, INSAS is no pig. Replace the defective parts like springs, magazines etc and you have a solid gun. Due to the position of the safety selector and charging handle, it can be made ambidextrous. And then there is the furniture. Replace handguard, gas block, muzzle device, Pistol grip, top cover, buttstock, magazine locking system (to accept AR-15 mags) and cut the barrel down to 14" and use 5.56 NATO ammo and you're good to go.Ek hi to pig hai apna, kitna lipstick lagaoge bechare pe!
Modifications are done to "enhance" things, like ergonomics or ambidexterity or may be for future proofing. There is no way you can enhance mechanical tolerances, clearances, metallurgy, design and manufacturing flaws by modifications.
In other words reinvent the Galil. The INSAS has become a cautionary tale for weapons design.Like I said, INSAS is no pig. Replace the defective parts like springs, magazines etc and you have a solid gun. Due to the position of the safety selector and charging handle, it can be made ambidextrous. And then there is the furniture. Replace handguard, gas block, muzzle device, Pistol grip, top cover, buttstock, magazine locking system (to accept AR-15 mags) and cut the barrel down to 14" and use 5.56 NATO ammo and you're good to go.
Let's add some more things in that etc, trust me it will be fun.Like I said, INSAS is no pig. Replace the defective parts like springs, magazines etc and you have a solid gun. Due to the position of the safety selector and charging handle, it can be made ambidextrous. And then there is the furniture. Replace handguard, gas block, muzzle device, Pistol grip, top cover, buttstock, magazine locking system (to accept AR-15 mags) and cut the barrel down to 14" and use 5.56 NATO ammo and you're good to go.
Yup. Add a cerakote finish just for the fun of it. A heavier profile barrel would also di well in terms of heat dissipation and accuracy. Replace the stamped steel reciever with a polymer one to compensate for the increased weight of the barrel. And make the top cover locking system similar to the AK-12. And then modify/replace the already new gas block for cleaning.Let's add some more things in that etc, trust me it will be fun.
Bolt, bolt carrier group and trunnion; there is no uniform heat treatment or annealing in different batches. So you end up with issues like galling.
Almost all the small parts like those of FCGs are usually outsourced from private firms and the usual method of manufacturing is MIM; one of the most infamous method in firearm industry.
The receiver and virtually all metal parts are either manganese phosphatized or blued; again a process made obsolete by new methods like ceramic based paint and nitriding.
After "modifying" this much thing you are left with a paradox; the ship of Theseus.
INSAS fires a SCHV bullet at higher velocity compared to fat ass bullet of Kalashnikov; if a percent of external ballistics is considered true then it's bound to be more accurate.Insas ain't any pig sirji, you may say I myself have called insas bad but I was reading a policeman's blog ( it said something about insas rifle ki chal)
He said , insas was accurate compared to ak.
I have deleted by comment, I respectfully back off , since Iam unable to prove you , whatever you wanted me to prove .INSAS fires a SCHV bullet at higher velocity compared to fat ass bullet of Kalashnikov; if a percent of external ballistics is considered true then it's bound to be more accurate.
Prove me wrong. I'll be glad.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
'It's Good': When US Soldiers Fired INSAS Rifle In Joint Military Drill | Indian Army | 1 | ||
Exclusive: Made in India rifles to replace INSAS | Indian Army | 90 | ||
Insas Excalibur 5.56mm Assault Rifle 3d Art | Military Multimedia | 2 | ||
Regarding replacement of INSAS Rifle | Indian Army | 2 |