- Joined
- Aug 3, 2010
- Messages
- 4,654
- Likes
- 8,370
Bro the guns in background also made by OFB?
yes..............................................
Bro the guns in background also made by OFB?
Pindad license makes Fn-FNC. You are just trying to shit on OFB. They might not have a solid history but each product should be seen on merits. JVPC is seeing widespread adoption, maybe this will too.The OFB carbine is utter crap like it's old version. Long Stroke Piston and Ak like gas port.
This is a PT Pindad Assault Rifle. It's superior in every single way.
Don't compare JVPC with this OFB crap. JVPC was designed by ARDE. Same with MCIWS.Pindad license makes Fn-FNC. You are just trying to shit on OFB. They might not have a solid history but each product should be seen on merits. JVPC is seeing widespread adoption, maybe this will too.
The carbine is also designed by ARDE. I dont think it's all that bad, but it's a little to late and like the JVPC, etc. will be given to police, para. JVPC had a long time in development, which this carbine doesnt have that time.Don't compare JVPC with this OFB crap. JVPC was designed by ARDE. Same with MCIWS.
The carbine is essentially a repackaged Kalantak. They didn't even bother to upgrade the iron sights. Could have simply used a version of the JVPC ones. The weapon could have used more polymer to reduce weight. Barrel length is not conducive since you have AR 15s or AKS 74u having a smaller barrel length for the same class of intermediate calibre rounds. With the introduction of JVPC there is no market for this weapon.The carbine is also designed by ARDE. I dont think it's all that bad, but it's a little to late and like the JVPC, etc. will be given to police, para.
It's not a repackaged Kalantak, it's disassembly itself seems different from regular INSAS. The INSAS iron sight is also on the JVPC. JVPC and this carbine do not clash, but it clashes with Caracal carbine offer, etc. This carbine was created for that requirement, but it's a little too late. IA doesnt want the JVPC for it's carbine requirement.The carbine is essentially a repackaged Kalantak. They didn't even bother to upgrade the iron sights. Could have simply used a version of the JVPC ones. The weapon could have used more polymer to reduce weight. Barrel length is not conducive since you have AR 15s or AKS 74u having a smaller barrel length for the same class of intermediate calibre rounds. With the introduction of JVPC there is no market for this weapon.
If IA had opted for JVPC, don't you think that it would have created logistic nightmare as JVPC is 5.56X30mm whereas Caracal is 5.56X45mm.It's not a repackaged Kalantak, it's disassembly itself seems different from regular INSAS. The INSAS iron sight is also on the JVPC. JVPC and this carbine do not clash, but it clashes with Caracal carbine offer, etc. This carbine was created for that requirement, but it's a little too late. IA doesnt want the JVPC for it's carbine requirement.
It's not a repackaged Kalantak, it's disassembly itself seems different from regular INSAS. The INSAS iron sight is also on the JVPC. JVPC and this carbine do not clash, but it clashes with Caracal carbine offer, etc. This carbine was created for that requirement, but it's a little too late. IA doesnt want the JVPC for it's carbine requirement.
We are buying 10 times more Russian rifles than American ones.Russians should not interrupt our policies .Also the price they are asking is double what they sell in Russia .Simply ripping of.
ARDE has no involvement in the Caracal deal. No one cares if they cleared or not. All it did was produce this current Carbine with OFB in response. Little too late.
Good luck to Sarkari OFB competing with this.
BTW DRDO (ARDE Parent Organisation) has cleared the CAR 816 CQB deal. I believe that once AK 203 production commences and first pieces are inducted, the deal with Caracal will go through.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EL4WDEfUUAEdUdk?format=jpg&name=900x900
So I heard, but they need to pick one fast. No way I want the ARDE/OFB carbine to go through the same time as JVPC in development. Forget that wait.Caracal's carbine may not be coming at all... Unlike Sig-716 deal that was quickly done & we've started receiving the products in December, that one is essentially dead!
I dont know if IA will ever order JVPCs, differently not for carbine requirement.If IA had opted for JVPC, don't you think that it would have created logistic nightmare as JVPC is 5.56X30mm whereas Caracal is 5.56X45mm.
Caracal's carbine may not be coming at all... Unlike Sig-716 deal that was quickly done & we've started receiving the products in December, that one is essentially dead!
................................................................................
Good luck to Sarkari OFB competing with this.
BTW DRDO (ARDE Parent Organisation) has cleared the CAR 816 CQB deal. I believe that once AK 203 production commences and first pieces are inducted, the deal with Caracal will go through.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EL4WDEfUUAEdUdk?format=jpg&name=900x900
Caracal carbine may not be coming at all... Unlike Sig-716's (genuinely great) deal that was quickly done & we've started receiving the products in December, that one is essentially dead!It's not a repackaged Kalantak, it's disassembly itself seems different from regular INSAS. The INSAS iron sight is also on the JVPC. JVPC and this carbine do not clash, but it clashes with Caracal carbine offer, etc. This carbine was created for that requirement, but it's a little too late. IA doesnt want the JVPC for it's carbine requirement.
...And for such a massive order, that's their bulk price!Also the price they are asking is double what they sell in Russia.
Yeah, DRDO/ARDE "lifted objection" to Carbine import & then displayed new carbine to DM & in Defexpo (Caracal wasn't though)!BTW DRDO (ARDE Parent Organisation) has cleared the CAR 816 CQB deal.
India had a multi caliber requirement with several rifles trialing all over then they switched ammo requirement like 2 times and all of a sudden AK203 just won a huge order. How?Russians should not interrupt our policies .Also the price they are asking is double what they sell in Russia .Simply ripping of.
We did use if for long time... The prodigious geblniouses were going for Ak-103 until the Russians insisted on Ak-203.India had a multi caliber requirement with several rifles trialing all over then they switched ammo requirement like 2 times and all of a sudden AK203 just won a huge order. How?
Did the AK203 even trial all over India?? It sure as hell didnt compete with any other rifle, company.
Marcos already use AK103...................India had a multi caliber requirement with several rifles trialing all over then they switched ammo requirement like 2 times and all of a sudden AK203 just won a huge order. How?
Did the AK203 even trial all over India?? It sure as hell didnt compete with any other rifle, company. This was a token to the Russians, and it sure as hell better not happen in the FICV, FRCV program.
Still man, It should've been a fair competition which is the norm. You would've gotten the best possible rifle and price.Marcos already use AK103...................
The deal will go through since each gun purchase is inked to an influential strategic partnership. AK 203 (Russia), SIG 716 (USA) and CAR 816 (UAE). As to the OFB Carbine, it's a fancy paperweight. However a few changes could make it much more presentable.Yeah, DRDO/ARDE "lifted objection" to Carbine import & then displayed new carbine to DM & in Defexpo (Caracal wasn't though)!
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
'It's Good': When US Soldiers Fired INSAS Rifle In Joint Military Drill | Indian Army | 1 | ||
Exclusive: Made in India rifles to replace INSAS | Indian Army | 90 | ||
Insas Excalibur 5.56mm Assault Rifle 3d Art | Military Multimedia | 2 | ||
Regarding replacement of INSAS Rifle | Indian Army | 2 |