INSAS Rifle, LMG & Carbine

Shaitan

Zandu Balm all day
New Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
4,654
Likes
8,370
Country flag

Kunal Biswas

Member of the Year 2011
New Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
31,122
Likes
41,041


The chart is old, Types of 5.56mm OFB produce, The SS109 was used during 1999 war and has less potential for killing ..



The core is steel and they are AP in nature ..

==================



From top, The third one is of OFB design ..

Its call BALL MK-1A ( steel core, AP nature ) and its standard, Tracer comes with marks ..

Metal boxes with handles which contain cardboard boxes each contain 20rnds ..

No special identification mark like a tip color to signify AP ? How does the soldier know if it's ball or ap or tracer ? Also how does ofb package ammo ? Is it like soviet/russian sealed spam cans inside wooden boxes, or something else like nato ammo tins with handles ?
So every round made by OFB is steel core?
And thank you for the replies.
Have we discussed the topic anytime to check the possibility that maybe it’s not the merits of the foreign weapons offered for trails that’s determining the selection criteria rather it’s the OFB ammo’s compatibility that’s a major factor..

All types of ammo of same caliber don’t have the same outcome with the same rifle. Since foreign weapons don’t keep OFB ammo in mind while designing their weapon, compatibility is a matter of chance when the trials happen.

Am I making sense?
 

Raj Malhotra

New Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
1,514
Likes
3,382
Country flag
Kunal very interesting pics. Particularly one with LMG INSAS with high power daylight scope (?). Magazine fed LMGs are always meant to have sniper/DMR role. Glad to see Army proactively leveraging this capability
 

vampyrbladez

New Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2018
Messages
10,283
Likes
26,675
Country flag

Flying Dagger

New Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2019
Messages
3,583
Likes
9,444
Country flag

vampyrbladez

New Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2018
Messages
10,283
Likes
26,675
Country flag
Increase of operational cost is one among many.
How? Beretta MX4 (9x19mm) is the size of an AR 15 pistol (5.56x45mm). You can get a JVPC carbine (5.56x30mm) for much less!

Comparison :



AR 15 (5.56x45mm)



JVPC (5.56x30mm)



MX4 STORM (9x19mm)
 

Kunal Biswas

Member of the Year 2011
New Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
31,122
Likes
41,041
Simply because the deal pre dates the induction of MSMC, Amogh or Anamika.


Anamika 9mm carbine
Photo credit : @sayareakd Sir.


Due to the availability of 9mm in large among paramilitary forces its easy to operate a 9mm sub-machine gun.

@Chinmoy , why is increase of operational cost ?

Increase of operational cost is one among many.
How? Beretta MX4 (9x19mm) is the size of an AR 15 pistol (5.56x45mm). You can get a JVPC carbine (5.56x30mm) for much less!
No Amogh. Only JVPC makes sense as part of procurement.
Why not simply get JVPC instead of these Beretta MX4? This looks like a bad deal!
 

Chinmoy

New Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2015
Messages
8,930
Likes
23,094
Country flag
How? Beretta MX4 (9x19mm) is the size of an AR 15 pistol (5.56x45mm). You can get a JVPC carbine (5.56x30mm) for much less!

Comparison :



AR 15 (5.56x45mm)



JVPC (5.56x30mm)



MX4 STORM (9x19mm)
Although @Kunal Biswas already replied, I would just highlight the aspect.

I was talking about increase in operational cost of the troops. ITBP or BSF operates three different caliber as of now.
5.56 NATO
7.62 AK
9x19 parabellum.
These are standard operating rounds available at any given time apart from few special ones. Now bring in 5.56 MINSAS and it mean 4 different rounds. Operational cost for any commander would increase with that.

We can't replace any of the existing rounds with MINSAS as of now.

Another aspect for non deployment of JVPC on front line is its maturity. As a weapon system it has not matured enough. It would be good to deploy them with CISF as replacement for 9 mm SMG forst and let it mature enough.
 

Articles

Top