Indian Woman for Combat Duties

Status
Not open for further replies.

srevster

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Messages
266
Likes
205
Country flag
Lol, focus on the topic. The law, the ability of women to participate in combat. It’s quite funny to see the grief it is causing you.
 

srevster

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Messages
266
Likes
205
Country flag
Sorry, I don't have white bottom-licking genes embedded in my chromosomes.
Then change the law and stop bitching. You have no jurisdiction over a women’s freedom or their bodies. If that causes you pain, there are plenty of counselors who can help.
 

ArgonPrime

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 5, 2019
Messages
1,344
Likes
2,010
Country flag
Lol, focus on the topic. The law,
Yeah, we are. We're focusing n the law of grand-ma nature and grandpa evolution and their law takes precedence over anything that's written on a piece of paper not worth more than the paper itself!!
the ability of women to participate in combat.
Which has been proven to be subpar by multiple studies that have been conducted by professionals over a period of more than 3 decades!! And I'm being generous here.
It’s quite funny to see the grief it is causing you.
It's not grief, it's only the sheer astonishment of us looking at your complete lack of basic comprehension abilities that you are witnessing here, nothing else.
 

ArgonPrime

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 5, 2019
Messages
1,344
Likes
2,010
Country flag
Then change the law and stop bitching. You have no jurisdiction over a women’s freedom or their bodies. If that causes you pain, there are plenty of counselors who can help.
No need to, cause I know no woman is gonna ever pass the minimum benchmark unless they decide to lower it for them, which will be a fucking disaster.
 

Heat

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2016
Messages
222
Likes
284
Country flag
We can't base our combat strategy on a few iffy outliers!!
This has more to do with precedence. Also, combat back in those days was much more physical in nature and given that those women warriors actually won, it sets a rather good precedent.

Yeah and then expect them to engage and win against a 178 cm tall pakhtun or a baloch!!
Tell this to the 5 and half feet tall Gurkhas. A 5.56 mm round fired by a woman or a man will do the same amount of damage regardless.

Put the same conditions on women that you require from men while recruiting them. Don't go lax, throw them in active combat and observe the results.
If it works, great, if it doesn't then relegate the unit to other menial stuff.

Yes, we have enough able bodied men, but this has more to do with cultivating a culture of combat in our women.
 
Last edited:

srevster

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Messages
266
Likes
205
Country flag
Since you are so good at reading comprehension, look up cognitive dissonance.
 

srevster

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Messages
266
Likes
205
Country flag
No need to, cause I know no woman is gonna ever pass the minimum benchmark unless they decide to lower it for them, which will be a fucking disaster.
Lots of women will pass. But Mr. Saturday 10:00AM cartoons and porn won’t.
 

Aspirant847

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2021
Messages
426
Likes
532
Country flag
No amount of "monkey business" (PUN INTENDED) here will deter me from supporting women's role in active combat. There is too much history to back up what I am saying that I can extrapolate their success. If you are too small minded or fearful of this; then you can work on that by visiting a counselor.

P.S. Bananas are my favorite fruit

For additional help, please refer to:
View attachment 80490
If I'm on an ops in the future I would rather have a man watch my back than a woman. This is the case for all the soldiers.
white knights like you come swooping in to save women, dude go home and be a bloody man.
 

srevster

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Messages
266
Likes
205
Country flag
If I'm on an ops in the future I would rather have a man watch my back than a woman. This is the case for all the soldiers.
white knights like you come swooping in to save women, dude go home and be a bloody man.
Ok fanboy. Soldiers don’t declare their future ops on an Internet forum, next.
 

ArgonPrime

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 5, 2019
Messages
1,344
Likes
2,010
Country flag
This is more to do with precedence. Also, combat back in those days was much more physical in nature and given that those women warriors actually won, it sets a rather good precedent.
Nope, they didn't win, not on their own. Stop inventing shit just to fit your narrative.

Tell this to the 5 and half feet tall Gurkhas.
You seriously compared a woman from Delhi with a fucking Gurkha of all!! Dude, leave DFI and seek help from some mental health professional pronto!!
A 5.56 mm round fired by a women or a man will do the same amount of damage regardless.
Oh yeah, and who's carry the load of the ammunition and all the other equipment for them?? Your dad??
Put the same conditions on women that you require from men while recruiting them.
Which they will fail without any exception. Other militaries have tried that and all those experimentations resulted in utter failures. I just don't see why we need to repeat their mistake just to prove that same old point all over again.
Don't go lax, throw them in active combat and observe the results.
In the end, they will end up lowering the bars for the women, like the others did.
If it works, great, if it doesn't then relegate the unit to other menial stuff.
The Israelies tried it, as did the Americans and some NATO militaries and none of them could make it work. What makes think we're gonna be an exception?? What's so special about Indian women??
Yes, we have enough able bodies men, but this has more to do with cultivating a culture of combat in our women.
Cultivate as much combat culture among the women as you want, I'm all for it. But what I've problem with is the idea that we should deploy them in frontline active combat. As long as you keep them relegated to rear areas, base security, perimeter patrol, running the comms, etc or even employ them as snipers if they qualify, i'm all for it. But infantry and armor and mech - the women should be kept at a distance.
 

srevster

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Messages
266
Likes
205
Country flag
Oh the desperation to be correct is funny. Nothing that is said in the forum will change the fact that women are already deployed in combat and their role will increase year over year. Opinions are just opinions. Policy is policy and facts are facts.

the facts are that:

India allows women in combat roles
Indian armed forces has a roadmap to expand their participation
Indian government and Supreme Court support this decision
Indian army chief is also supportive of greater participation
 

ArgonPrime

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 5, 2019
Messages
1,344
Likes
2,010
Country flag
Ok fanboy. Soldiers don’t declare their future ops on an Internet forum, next.
It's a defense forum and many members personally know or at least have interacted with serving soldiers. So yeah, we know. It's honey-boo boos like yourself who need to get out more and have some conversation with the fighting men.
 

Aspirant847

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2021
Messages
426
Likes
532
Country flag
Lol, focus on the topic. The law, the ability of women to participate in combat. It’s quite funny to see the grief it is causing you.
What ability huh, I can fuck up any women in combat I've ever seen in my life, men are better at fuckin everything. Actual combat, men are better, simulated combat men are better, physical fitness men are better. Dude we don't need women to weaken us, all they'll be is a big liability who the men have to look out for and give their own lives for.

People like you sit comfy in their homes, you don't have any bloody idea of what actual combat is or even being in an infantry battalion is.

Again, men won't respect a weak leader or a weak colleague, they won't have anybody's respect.
 

srevster

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Messages
266
Likes
205
Country flag
It's a defense forum and many members personally know or at least have interacted with serving soldiers. So yeah, we know. It's honey-boo boos like yourself who need to get out more and have some conversation with the fighting men.
Lol. Serving soldiers have better things to do than talk to 24 year olds. Indian army is professional and cut from a different cloth.
 

Aspirant847

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2021
Messages
426
Likes
532
Country flag
This has more to do with precedence. Also, combat back in those days was much more physical in nature and given that those women warriors actually won, it sets a rather good precedent.


Tell this to the 5 and half feet tall Gurkhas. A 5.56 mm round fired by a woman or a man will do the same amount of damage regardless.

Put the same conditions on women that you require from men while recruiting them. Don't go lax, throw them in active combat and observe the results.
If it works, great, if it doesn't then relegate the unit to other menial stuff.

Yes, we have enough able bodied men, but this has more to do with cultivating a culture of combat in our women.
why tf do we need to cultivate that culture? And what, battle tests have already shown huge differences in men and women. Why do we need to risk lives of those women and the men with them to give some social justice pussy the pleasure
 

srevster

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Messages
266
Likes
205
Country flag
why tf do we need to cultivate that culture? And what, battle tests have already shown huge differences in men and women. Why do we need to risk lives of those women and the men with them to give some social justice pussy the pleasure
Because strong women raise strong men. Rinse and repeat; you will have a superpower
 

Heat

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2016
Messages
222
Likes
284
Country flag
Nope, they didn't win, not on their own. Stop inventing shit just to fit your narrative.


You seriously compared a woman from Delhi with a fucking Gurkha of all!! Dude, leave DFI and seek help from some mental health professional pronto!!

Oh yeah, and who's carry the load of the ammunition and all the other equipment for them?? Your dad??

Which they will fail without any exception. Other militaries have tried that and all those experimentations resulted in utter failures. I just don't see why we need to repeat their mistake just to prove that same old point all over again.

In the end, they will end up lowering the bars for the women, like the others did.

The Israelies tried it, as did the Americans and some NATO militaries and none of them could make it work. What makes think we're gonna be an exception?? What's so special about Indian women??

Cultivate as much combat culture among the women as you want, I'm all for it. But what I've problem with is the idea that we should deploy them in frontline active combat. As long as you keep them relegated to rear areas, base security, perimeter patrol, running the comms, etc or even employ them as snipers if they qualify, i'm all for it. But infantry and armor and mech - the women should be kept at a distance.
Chill out dude. No need to throw punches at me.

The others may have done it, but their is no loss of honor if we do it for ourselves. Give the women a chance, if they are able to pass the tests, awesome, if not then scrap the entire thing.

You don't want to give them even a chance ? Or have we already done that in India ?

Take a level headed approach.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top