Gessler
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2016
- Messages
- 2,312
- Likes
- 11,249
We will see about that.No Arihant class may ever be converted to SSN/SSGN duty because of the under powered reactor
First of all, what is "enough" second-strike capability? Is there some benchmark number? Who has given these numbers? Who exactly knows how many warheads we have? What kind of MIRVs we're developing?and not enough second strike capability even with the larger boomers especially with our puny warheads period.
Definitely it's neither you nor me.
It are the people who know the correct answers to these questions that determine what constitutes as "enough" second-strike capability.
Only way we're gonna make that 190Mw-rated PWR, is with Russian help. Ofcourse they won't do anything violating their treaties, but a workaround is always there. No-one is going to transfer the core technologies to us, those IPRs will remain with the Russians.If it is true then it is a good news . Well Russians might not help us as it will violate NPT even in 2000 they might have helped us only in the core geometry of the Ok-650 for us to miniaturize.It is highly optimistic for us to expect them to help us in it after we sucked up to west . All these may be a big " if "
Who said we're not? You will see that regardless of whether we go for French or Russian-type designs, the SSN class we'll be building will be in the region of 5,000 tons displacement.Well who said we are looking for 5000t SSNs
What is known is that they'll be smaller than the Arihant for sure. Smaller, lighter, faster & harder to detect. A true hunter-killer.
By what measure of naval warfare is a 5,000-ton nuclear submarine considered a midget?all these are in realm of speculation. India should build upon the 971 and the OK 650 reactor of the subs it has operated upon not some midget french SSN.
It means that what YOU want is vastly different from what IN wants.WTF does this mean ?????????????????????????????????????