QUOTE=panduranghari;690839]Sorry but you are rehashing the same old tripe.
Again bull shit stuff.
[
The Horse And The Aryan Debate
Physical remains of the horse in Indus-Sarasvati sites
Our first surprise is that contrary to conventional assertions, quite a few archaeologists have reported horse remains from India's prehistoric sites. A. Ghosh's respected and authoritative Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology mentions without fuss:
In India the ... true horse is reported from the Neolithic levels at Kodekal [dist. Gulbarga of Karnataka] and Hallur [dist. Raichur of Karnataka] and the late Harappa levels at Mohenjo-daro (Sewell and Guha, 1931) and Ropar and at Harappa, Lothal and numerous other sites. "¦ Recently bones of Equus caballus have also been reported from the proto-Harappa site of
Malvan in Gujarat.1
Mortimer Wheeler, a flamboyant proponent of the Aryan invasion theory if ever there was one, admitted long ago that "it is likely enough that camel, horse and ass were in fact a familiar feature of the Indus caravan."2 The well- known archaeologist B. B. Lal refers to a number of horse teeth and bones reported from Kalibangan, Ropar, Malvan and Lothal.3 Another senior archaeologist, S. P. Gupta, adds further details on those finds, including early ones.4 In the case of Lothal, the archaeozoologist Bhola Nath certified the identification of a tooth;5 he also made similar observations regarding bones from Mohenjo-daro and Harappa.6
Through a thorough study of the equid remains of the prehistoric settlement of Surkotada, Kutch, excavated under the direction of Dr. J. P. Joshi, I can state the following: The occurrence of true horse (Equus caballus L.) was evidenced by the enamel pattern of the upper and lower cheek and teeth and by the size and form of incisors and phalanges (toe bones). Since no wild horses lived in India in post-Pleistocene times, the domestic nature of the Surkotada horses is undoubtful. This is also supported by an inter- maxilla fragment whose incisor tooth shows clear signs of crib biting, a bad habit only existing among domestic horses which are not extensively used for war.
[/QUOTE]
Well, either don't read.
the one u are talking are the horse before the ice age, i.e. pre-historic time.
Horses became extinct in large parts of the world, same is true with america and indian subcontinent.
Please read below:
Pleistocene extinctions
Digs in western Canada have unearthed clear evidence horses existed in North America until about 12,000 years ago.[29] However, all Equidae in North America ultimately became extinct. The causes of this extinction (simultaneous with the extinctions of a variety of other American megafauna) have been a matter of debate. Given the suddenness of the event and because these mammals had been flourishing for millions of years previously, something quite unusual must have happened. The first main hypothesis attributes extinction to climate change. For example, in Alaska, beginning approximately 12,500 years ago, the grasses characteristic of a steppe ecosystem gave way to shrub tundra, which was covered with unpalatable plants.[30][31] The other hypothesis suggests extinction was linked to overexploitation of naive prey by newly arrived humans. The extinctions were roughly simultaneous with the end of the most recent glacial advance and the appearance of the big game-hunting Clovis culture.[32][33] Several studies have indicated humans probably arrived in Alaska at the same time or shortly before the local extinction of horses.[33][34][35] Additionally, it has been proposed that the steppe-tundra vegetation transition in Beringia may have been a consequence, rather than a cause, of the extinction of megafaunal grazers.[36]
In Eurasia, horse fossils began occurring frequently again in archaeological sites in Kazakhstan and the southern Ukraine about 6,000 years ago.[27] From then on, domesticated horses, as well as the knowledge of capturing, taming, and rearing horses, probably spread relatively quickly, with wild mares from several wild populations being incorporated en route.
there is huge gap b/w the pre-historic and horses remains found in indus valley civilization.
So horses did became extinct, same as Hippo went extinct from india.
Maybe you don't know that hippo was also found in large parts of india, even elephant was found in kashmir region before it became extinct there.
Quaternary extinctions in Southeast Asia | Julien Louys - Academia.edu
Horses became extinct from large places in world.
due to scientific evidence only i suggested that horse were reintroduced in india by aryans by trade or migration, same way it was re-introduced by spanish in america.
Some more evidence to support my claim.
please read facts before saying other's points as bullshit.
The Aryan Debate: Horse | varnam
also you brought your facts from.
The Horse And The Aryan Debate
please read its conclusion also.
it doesn't agree with date which many people say, but it does agree that horse is not native species of india.
Some more timeline for horse.
1500 bce
The Mittani arrive in the Middle East and ally with Egypt; Wassukkani is their capital. The famous black horses of Nefertiti were probably Mittani.
Horses are introduced into northern India at this time, the beginning of the Vedic Era. Mittani and Indian horses belong to the same family.
Sometime between 1500 and 1450, King Shaushshatar of the Mittani loots the Assyrian city of Ashur, teaching its citizens the importance of the horse.
from:
Horses: a history