- Joined
- Oct 14, 2020
- Messages
- 27,568
- Likes
- 190,672
Subsidies and freebies should be for the extremely poor or people who'll live substandard life without assistance, I agree. But... shouldn't that reduce over time? Like with GDP growing at 7-8% every year, and poverty rapidly decreasing, the allocation for freebies should ideally be reducing over time, is that happening? Nope. Because it is a tactic used by all parties for votes. Congress started free food grains for 81 crore people in 2013, Modi is still continuing it in 2024 for a few more years which costs billion of USD equivalent cash which could've helped in productive freebies like mass affordable housing construction, building industrial parks and 24/7 electricity and piped water supply to all.The original purpose of free electricity water was relieving some weight off the economically weaker sections of the society.
A household that spends less than 200 units is probably lower class and stressed economically. Probably does not have AC or even washing machine.
Saving some money from electricity bill a household could better use the amount in uplifting their future by spending on education and healthcare.
This isn't limited to just families but students as well who may live in a flat that do not consume more than 200 unit.
Money doesn't grow on trees, why tf am I supposed to pay for some chhapri who spends whole day on his phone scrolling reels while enjoying free electricity, food, water on taxpayers money.