Indian Counter Terror Operations Pictures & Discussions

Status
Not open for further replies.

lcafanboy

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2013
Messages
5,830
Likes
37,453
Country flag
Pak Military Calls Top-Level Meeting Over Nawaz Sharif's 26/11 Remarks
All India Reported by Bhairavi Singh, Edited by Debanish Achom
After Pakistan's ousted Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's comments on the 26/11 terror attacks, the Pakistani military has called a high-level meeting
Updated : May 13, 2018 21:55 IST

Pakistan's ousted PM Nawaz Sharif has spoken on Pakistan's hand in the 26/11 Mumbai attacks

New Delhi: The Pakistani military has taken note of the comments made by their ousted Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif on the 26/11 terror attacks in Mumbai. It has called a high-level "national security" meeting over what Mr Sharif said in an interview with Karachi-based daily Dawn, that Pakistani terrorists carried out the 2008 Mumbai attacks and such terror strikes could have been prevented.

"Militant organisations are active. Call them non-state actors, should we allow them to cross the border and kill 150 people in Mumbai? Explain it to me. Why can't we complete the trial?" Mr Sharif said, according to the newspaper.


The Pakistani military has asked Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi to discuss "recent misleading media statements on the Mumbai incident", said the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), the media wing of the Pakistani armed forces. The meeting will be held on Monday, the ISPR said.

The Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) said the former prime minister's remarks in the interview with Dawnhave been misinterpreted by the Indian media and a section of the Pakistani media. Mr Sharif is the founder of the PML(N).

Former cricketer and chairman of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, Imran Khan, accused Mr Sharif of betraying the country since the former prime minister is facing corruption charges linked to the Panama Papers scandal.India has long accused Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba of carrying out the attacks in Mumbai on 26 November, 2008, that left 166 people dead and many injured after 10 terrorists with backpacks, automatic weapons and grenades launched a three-day siege on India's financial capital, targeting multiple locations.


Terrorist Hafiz Saeed is roaming freely in Pakistan and is even giving political speeches.

Mumbai attack mastermind Hafiz Saeed is roaming freely in Pakistanand is even giving political speeches. Maulana Masood Azhar's Jamaat-ud-Dawah and Jaish-e-Mohammad are also operating in Pakistan with impunity.

India has maintained that it was Lashkar-e-Taiba's terrorists who sailed into Mumbai from Karachi to carry out the attacks in an operation that was coordinated by the Pakistani intelligence agency, ISI.

Mr Sharif's remark contradicts the official stand of Islamabad, which insists that India has not furnished enough evidence to prove that Pakistani terrorists were involved.


India has accused the Pakistani military of supporting terrorists to wage a proxy war.

The Mumbai case is being tried in an anti-terrorism court since 2009 but the case isn't going anywhere. Indian officials say Pakistan did not keep its end of the bargain and sent the case to court without really investigating the conspiracy that led to the attacks.

Mr Sharif was forced out by the Supreme Court in July over a scandal kindled by the Panama Papers leak. He became the 15th premier in Pakistan's 70-year history to be ousted before completing a full term, after the corruption investigation against him.

The claims against him stemmed from the Panama Papers leak in 2016, which sparked a media frenzy over the luxurious lifestyles and high-end London property portfolio owned by his family. Mr Sharif and his supporters have denied the allegations and hinted at a political conspiracy driven by the powerful military.
https://www.google.co.in/amp/s/www....fs-26-11-remarks-1851557?amp=1&akamai-rum=off
Pakistan army in panic mode. They know Modi won't let this opportunity to declare pak a terrorist nation go waste.
 

lcafanboy

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2013
Messages
5,830
Likes
37,453
Country flag
Lol what:pound::pound: Pakis is enjoying MFN status from India for last two decades
And even then we have huge trade surplus with them....:pound::pound:

Giving MFN to Pakistan is actually good for us as we can get products from most competitive source.

Pakistanis buy Indian products from Dubai and other countries who repack our products and sell them for profit. In all this Pakistanis are losers....
 

ezsasa

Designated Cynic
Mod
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
32,036
Likes
148,569
Country flag
Locals help militants escape in South Kashmir's Pulwama.

 

Yatharth Singh

Knowledge is power.
Regular Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2010
Messages
744
Likes
176
Country flag

Mikesingh

Professional
Joined
Sep 7, 2015
Messages
7,353
Likes
30,450
Country flag
And even then we have huge trade surplus with them....:pound::pound:

Giving MFN to Pakistan is actually good for us as we can get products from most competitive source.

Pakistanis buy Indian products from Dubai and other countries who repack our products and sell them for profit. In all this Pakistanis are losers....
Spot on! We have a $1.2 billion trade surplus with Pak which means we're bleeding Pak by nearly Rs 15000 crores PKR every year! In fact we need to step up our exports to them. One can call this economic terrorism against Pak by India, but it pays!!

Anything is par for the course as long as the Porks get screwed! :biggrin2:
 

12arya

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2017
Messages
4,208
Likes
15,080
Country flag
Pak Military Calls Top-Level Meeting Over Nawaz Sharif's 26/11 Remarks
All India Reported by Bhairavi Singh, Edited by Debanish Achom
After Pakistan's ousted Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's comments on the 26/11 terror attacks, the Pakistani military has called a high-level meeting
Updated : May 13, 2018 21:55 IST

Pakistan's ousted PM Nawaz Sharif has spoken on Pakistan's hand in the 26/11 Mumbai attacks

New Delhi: The Pakistani military has taken note of the comments made by their ousted Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif on the 26/11 terror attacks in Mumbai. It has called a high-level "national security" meeting over what Mr Sharif said in an interview with Karachi-based daily Dawn, that Pakistani terrorists carried out the 2008 Mumbai attacks and such terror strikes could have been prevented.

"Militant organisations are active. Call them non-state actors, should we allow them to cross the border and kill 150 people in Mumbai? Explain it to me. Why can't we complete the trial?" Mr Sharif said, according to the newspaper.


The Pakistani military has asked Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi to discuss "recent misleading media statements on the Mumbai incident", said the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), the media wing of the Pakistani armed forces. The meeting will be held on Monday, the ISPR said.

The Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) said the former prime minister's remarks in the interview with Dawnhave been misinterpreted by the Indian media and a section of the Pakistani media. Mr Sharif is the founder of the PML(N).

Former cricketer and chairman of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, Imran Khan, accused Mr Sharif of betraying the country since the former prime minister is facing corruption charges linked to the Panama Papers scandal.India has long accused Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba of carrying out the attacks in Mumbai on 26 November, 2008, that left 166 people dead and many injured after 10 terrorists with backpacks, automatic weapons and grenades launched a three-day siege on India's financial capital, targeting multiple locations.


Terrorist Hafiz Saeed is roaming freely in Pakistan and is even giving political speeches.

Mumbai attack mastermind Hafiz Saeed is roaming freely in Pakistanand is even giving political speeches. Maulana Masood Azhar's Jamaat-ud-Dawah and Jaish-e-Mohammad are also operating in Pakistan with impunity.

India has maintained that it was Lashkar-e-Taiba's terrorists who sailed into Mumbai from Karachi to carry out the attacks in an operation that was coordinated by the Pakistani intelligence agency, ISI.

Mr Sharif's remark contradicts the official stand of Islamabad, which insists that India has not furnished enough evidence to prove that Pakistani terrorists were involved.


India has accused the Pakistani military of supporting terrorists to wage a proxy war.

The Mumbai case is being tried in an anti-terrorism court since 2009 but the case isn't going anywhere. Indian officials say Pakistan did not keep its end of the bargain and sent the case to court without really investigating the conspiracy that led to the attacks.

Mr Sharif was forced out by the Supreme Court in July over a scandal kindled by the Panama Papers leak. He became the 15th premier in Pakistan's 70-year history to be ousted before completing a full term, after the corruption investigation against him.

The claims against him stemmed from the Panama Papers leak in 2016, which sparked a media frenzy over the luxurious lifestyles and high-end London property portfolio owned by his family. Mr Sharif and his supporters have denied the allegations and hinted at a political conspiracy driven by the powerful military.
https://www.google.co.in/amp/s/www.ndtv.com/india-news/pakistan-military-goes-into-a-huddle-over-nawaz-sharifs-26-11-remarks-1851557?amp=1&akamai-rum=off
Pakistan army in panic mode. They know Modi won't let this opportunity to declare pak a terrorist nation go waste.

as u guys have predicted....nawaz sharif miyaan is turning out to b an RSS mole:biggrin2: also we can now safely expect that in 10 yrs time porkis will accept our little surgery in POK, ie, if there is still a country called pakistan then!!!
 

Samsung J7

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2018
Messages
496
Likes
523

Report says some terrorists already infiltrated into Jammu. R they planning another attack on army camps in Jammu
 

12arya

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2017
Messages
4,208
Likes
15,080
Country flag

Report says some terrorists already infiltrated into Jammu. R they planning another attack on army camps in Jammu
it says movement along IB border. and that means what? infiltrated or not? i don't know how our border is. ithey probably r trying to but has not been able to get in yet.
 

Chinmoy

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2015
Messages
8,787
Likes
22,848
Country flag
There is a conspiracy theory that says that 26/11 was orchestrated by Congress/UPA Government & Pakistan Government in cahoots. The aim was for Pak governmnet to be able to finger point "India's home grown terrorists" & for UPA to blame saffron terrorism.

UPA government's attempts to trump up idea of saffron terrorism, Involvement of Hemant Karkare, followup consipracy theories floated by liberals including this book, Mani Shankar Aiyer's rants on this subject all are seen as evidence.

Whether true or not, one thing is for sure ..the nation especially Hindus will be indebted to Shahid Tukaram Ombale. Without him, we would have never known the truth.
I think one German Elias Davidsson also penned one book, 'The Betrayal of India' according to which it was carried out by R&AW and Mossad. It is a favorite with Pakis. I am sure that he might have got the idea from Mr Aziz only.
 

pruthvi24

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2017
Messages
362
Likes
1,200
Country flag
Shariff is not a saint he was in bed with those Bastards this was done for International Audience with FATF blaclkist thing coming in June he is making it difficult for Pakistan army may be he knows he will be out of Power for atleast 10 years i would still not Trust him but Pak army is getting Jittery Manzoor Pashteen is giving them lot of trouble Shariff is just adding fuel to the fire
 

pruthvi24

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2017
Messages
362
Likes
1,200
Country flag
Locals help militants escape in South Kashmir's Pulwama.

even though i don't like General Panag he raised very valid point some days back The art of Sniping is disappearing in Indian army Imagine if we had a sniper in near by area of the above video we could have shot that terrorist down Kashmir is a mountain Terrain A well Trained Sniper will be deadly in the valley this can also bring halt to Terrorists giving Gun salutes to dead terrorists (if I was in charge in the valley i would have Dumped their bodies in Sea or burnt them as these burial grounds become Shrine for others)
 

SanjeevM

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2017
Messages
1,631
Likes
4,503
Country flag
http://www.tribuneindia.com/mobi/news/comment/what-army-s-restraint-in-j-k-means/589207.html

What army’s ‘restraint’ in J&K means
Lt-Gen Syed Ata Hasnain (retd)
A unilateral restraint in operations is no indicator of weakness. It is a display of confidence and will to seek peace. The concept must be such that in case of failure, the return to operations must not witness greater terrorist capability.
Posted at: May 15, 2018, 1:17 AM
Last updated: May 15, 2018, 1:17 AM (IST)

Restraint: Ceasefire proposed for second time in J&K. Tribune photo: Mohammad Amin War


Lt-Gen Syed Ata Hasnain (retd)Ex-GOC of the Srinagar-based 15 Corps

In J&K's bleak security landscape through 2017-18, a unilateral ceasefire proposed by the state's mainstream parties was bound to be received with a mix of emotions, some happy and others involving concern, disquiet and a sense of foreboding. The term ceasefire is itself questionable because in sub-conventional operations, the accepted term is seizure of offensive operations (SOO) or, simply, restraint in operations.

Unilateral decisions of this kind are many times perceived as something which only the disadvantaged side looks to as a reprieve from a difficult operational situation it finds itself in. This is a flawed perception. While the almost daily incidents of killing in Kashmir have caused dismay, the proposal to restrain operations by the state is not such a simple issue. It needs much greater deliberation from two angles: first, the psychological messaging which arises from such a decision; and second, on the doability of the proposal.

Earlier ‘ceasefire’

In J&K, this is the second time that the issue has arisen, the first being then Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee's Ramzan 'ceasefire' of November, 2000. While the government may have for now not accepted the proposal, two models of this need to be kept in mind. The first is of Nagaland where such a decision resulted in a successful negotiation that has fructified into a yet-to-be-firmed-in settlement; it does need a reminder that in the North-East, the level of proxy and ideological support has mostly remained below threshold. The second is the Sri Lanka model where the LTTE went through many such arrangements with the army only to emerge stronger each time to fight back with renewed vigour.

Reports in Delhi indicated that intelligence agencies possibly favoured such a step and extracts from the Army Chief's interview with a mainstream newspaper were also being initially used to indicate the Army's favour for the same. The proposal needs a deeper analysis.

There is no doubt that the current situation is not reflective of any domination by the terrorists. Operation All Out has met unqualified success in terms of neutralisation of the armed cadres. Yet, the situation is not under full control because of the deep-set alienation which has forced the Kashmiri youth in particular to take to the streets, unmindful of their safety. A persistence of this attitude is dangerous and unpredictable. There also appears a spurt in recruitment to local terrorist ranks. The Durbar has just returned to the Valley and the month of Ramzan is approaching, the ending of which will nearly coincide with the commencement of the Amarnath Yatra. The Chief Minister's proposal did make sense from the timing and situation point of view, provided the powers-that-be are clear what they are aiming at. We have the experience of the Non-Initiation of Combat Operations (NICO) of 2000-01 in J&K and of the SOO in the North-East to go by and the institutional knowledge of the Army will always be handy.

Focused aim must

Any major decision in operations must have a focused aim — the necessity to allow things to calm and emotions stabilise. Yet it cannot allow a leeway for rebuilding terrorist capability and wherewithal. Restraint in such operations has to be a graded one, with nuances that will ensure both adequate control and sufficient freedom. The political community must have the chance to go back to the grassroots and engage with its constituencies. There has to be absence of violence. The spelling of saner narratives will then be possible. The one thing to guard against is disinformation and misinformation enabled by social media.

The naysayers need to understand that in the world of sub-conventional operations, ego must be shelved since there are no winners or losers against your own people; that is the notion with which the Army operates. A unilateral restraint in operations is no indicator of weakness. In fact, it is a display of confidence and the will to seek peace. The concept of execution must remain such that in the eventuality of failure, the return to operations must not witness greater terrorist capability.

Under such a decision, the Army does not go into rest and recuperation mode or back to its barracks. The challenge of execution is actually even greater than when operational freedom exists. Offensive operations are curbed (no cordon and search and no search and destroy operations) but open display of weapons by terrorists invites action. All defensive operations continue and this includes securing of roads and installations, area domination and display of the flag. There is no change in the execution of counter-infiltration at the LoC. The presumption is that terrorists, too, will refrain from striking, although all security precautions remain in place. The problem in execution arises when such a halt exists only against local terrorists. In end-2000, during the NICO period, the LeT conducted a dastardly but failed attempt to storm into Srinagar airport. With strength of foreign terrorists now much lower, this too can be overcome.

If giving peace a chance is the aim, then absence of an identified terrorist leadership is likely to militate against it. The engagement with the public will have to take the shape of 'awami sunwai', an experiment in direct engagement successfully conducted in 2011-12 to promote hope through interaction. For this, the political community and the administrators will have to take risks and step forward even as they receive flak and humiliation.

In a worse scenario, the exercise in restraint could just fail. With a professional army, return to operational mode will be immediate and a projection of moral ascendancy having been achieved through the restraint will not be unhelpful in the conduct of psychological operations.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Global Defence

Articles

Top