Poseidon
New Member
- Joined
- May 28, 2011
- Messages
- 2,009
- Likes
- 6,487
US Army's 5th Special Forces group sustained 834 hostile fire deaths in Vietnam between 1966-73.Which field deployed SF didn't have casualties?
US Army's 5th Special Forces group sustained 834 hostile fire deaths in Vietnam between 1966-73.Which field deployed SF didn't have casualties?
Funny...I thought you know more about how armed forces function.NO
I suspected even when pathankot happened. Para SF seems to be doing way better all these elite specialised commandos even when it comes to close combat as a squad. Although Para SF role is to have more offensive.
The point is not all SF are at the same level of COIN ops experience.WTF is wrong with some people....
Some bastard had his lucky day and you're suspecting the training of your SFs.
This is a war of attrition....it wouldn't be too long before the rats who feared daddi wala fauj will give a respectable name to our fearsome garuds....it just takes some time to build the reputation.
That wouldn't be too long.... who feels that garuds need time...start counting the days...
Funny...I thought you know more about how armed forces function.
In the armed forces....there are roles allocated to every team. These teams are supposed to fill their part by any and all means necessary. In failure of doing so is considered as failure to comply the direct order.
In case of Phatankot the role of Garuds was to protect the capital assets.....nothing more nothing less! Period!! Does anyone remember similar kind of attack on Pak naval base in 2011. If not go through this link.
https://www.dawn.com/news/630878
In that attack 2 Orions and a helo was destroyed.
Garuds performed excellently, they prevented the destruction of IAF aircraft thus saved us a lot of embarrassment.
They held their ground and didn't chase the terrorists.
If you want to know more on how armed forces function then pls ask gurus @Mikesingh & @Kunal Biswas
If you still don't understand then I'll not disturb you from your delusion.
The inferences below are speculation on my part:I already said that the basic difference between a haramkhor ugarvadi and a commando is of mentality.
You cannot compare pathankkot with this operation.
Pathankot was like surprize for the security personals deployed there.
This operation was planned and offensive to eliminate the ugarvadi and intruders with all the intel on ground, medics ust 100mtrs snipers all ready , full fledged team.
Not one but both two got hit? If it was one i would digest that okay he might have exposed himself, but both were out in open that both got mortally hit?
I don't question anything but there is some lapse this is why this happened.And Garud cannot afford lose games.
It's clear Garuds were operating with 9 Para and even though the 2 losses through heavy fire including volley of grenades, the pigs were killed by the Garuds.
So who is correct?http://www.newindianexpress.com/nat...ed-blow-in-their-first-operation-1671290.html
Garuds were with the Army for live situational training. They came in August and this is the first batch. Idea to embedded Garud Commandoes was aimed to mould them into a well-knit fighting force capable of taking on terrorists,” said a defence official.
Garuds were not part of anti terror ops in 2005.They were there for base protection.So who is correct?
This report or Ajai Shukla who says Garuds have been doing this since 2005 and have even eliminated couple of HM commanders?
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Indian Counter Terror Operations Pictures | Indian Army | 1584 | ||
Indian - russian counter - terror excerise ** indra - 2010 ** | Indian Army | 17 | ||
Indian Army Begins Training Regular Troops to Counter Terrorism | Indian Army | 3 | ||
What is Tibetology, the Indian Army is eyeing to counter China | Indian Army | 2 |