Why are they still sticking to this vehicle????
Why Why
Because it's completely analog. It uses an analog fuel injection and engine management, and can withstand an EMP. A modern vehicle with electronic engine management will turn into paperweight after an EMP attack. It's the same reason why senior officers still use petrol Ambassadors, with analog engines. 1. they're immune to EMP, 2. they don't trust engine electronics (ECUs) sourced from China.Why are they still sticking to this vehicle????
Why Why
There is better option available abroad , khuda gawah ha ki gypsy does not fill army requirements ,Maruti Gypsy is one of the best off-road vehicles ever made in India. The other one being the Mahindra Willy's, and variants thereof.
then isn't it better to rely on horses and bullock carts if we are afraid of modern technology.Because it's completely analog. It uses an analog fuel injection and engine management, and can withstand an EMP. A modern vehicle with electronic engine management will turn into paperweight after an EMP attack. It's the same reason why senior officers still use petrol Ambassadors, with analog engines. 1. they're immune to EMP, 2. they don't trust engine electronics (ECUs) sourced from China.
Even a shuddh-desi Tata Indica eV2 with Indian Tata CR4 engine uses a Chinese-made ECU. The ARM SoCs on those ECUs could very well have a surreptitious GPS module. All it takes is a ping to a Chinese satellite masquerading as a GPS sat, to give away your pos.
I think @tarunraju is talking about EMP attacks, not livestock hauled carriages.then isn't it better to rely on horses and bullock carts if we are afraid of modern technology.
I have seen the performance of Gypsy vehicles on rough mountain terrain driven by army personnel. On a recent trip to Nathula Pass the road was non existent and there was a Gypsy ahead of us bouncing all over the rocks and barely able to make a headway. An army Pajero came from behind and roared away with apparent ease.I think @tarunraju is talking about EMP attacks, not livestock hauled carriages.
It is one thing to be "modern," and quite another to be vulnerable. If legacy technology makes a vehicle less vulnerable, then legacy technology is certainly better than modern technology.
I have been on the Gypsy in the Bandhavgarh National Forest and to the Rohtang Pass. I have been to Nathu La Pass, and also travelled from Gangtok, Sikkim to Siliguri, in the middle of a torrent, in Mahindra 4x4. NH had a landslide, so we had to take the mountain un-metalled roads. Also, I have the experience of climbing Tiger Hill near Darjeeling on a decades old Land Rover, which most modern Land Rovers are guaranteed to fail.I have seen the performance of Gypsy vehicles on rough mountain terrain driven by army personnel. On a recent trip to Nathula Pass the road was non existent and there was a Gypsy ahead of us bouncing all over the rocks and barely able to make a headway. An army Pajero came from behind and roared away with apparent ease.
Also there are studies which show that nearly 60% to 80% vehicles will survive and EMP attack. If required the vehicles can be EMP protected, though I admit it will be expensive.
The disadvantages of Gypsy far outweigh this argument.
Will the 1300 cc engine pick up all the weight ????Wouldn't it be great if they insert metal plates into the doors and panels to give some resistance to light and medium firing. Something like the basic military hummer where armour plates are detachable from the doors.