Indian Army Aviation Wing

[Armand2REP]

@Armand2REP,

1. Russia still have working facility at the Ulan-Ude aircraft plant...

They only make Su-25 trainers, the attack aircraft is called Su-39.

http://www.uuaz.ru/production/su39/su39_about_e.html

 

[Kunal Biswas]

They only make Su-25 trainers, the attack aircraft is called Su-39.

http://www.uuaz.ru/production/su39/su39_about_e.html

SU-39 is a Upgraded variants of Su-25TM (also known as Su-39).
It is also SU-25..

 

[edkaini753]

Every army has it's aviation department but it is comparatively much concise than the air force.

 

[youngindian]

i think A-10 Thunderbolt is good option for army.

 

[SATISH]

Yak 141 must be funded and produced...it is an awesome aircraft with great capabilities.

 

[JHA]

A-10 looks good...YAK-141 is still in prototype stage.it will need funding and time to be produced..
Although i think HAWK can do the trick for IA but getting A-10/YAK-141 will be a shot in the arm..

 

[Yatharth Singh]

When it comes to CAS then our upcoming trainer HAL HJT-36 Sitara, LCA Tejas trainer,BAE Hawk Mk 132 must be taken into account. They are light, swift enough for ground support operations, and able to carry enough weapons.
If India has to go for army aviation jets then I would suggest nothing than these mentioned above.(because cost also matters)

 

[Agantrope]

When it comes to CAS then our upcoming trainer HAL HJT-36 Sitara, LCA Tejas trainer,BAE Hawk Mk 132 must be taken into account. They are light, swift enough for ground support operations, and able to carry enough weapons.
If India has to go for army aviation jets then I would suggest nothing than these mentioned above.(because cost also matters)

It will be ok for the IA to operate the rotary wing flying machine rather than a fixed one for that only we are having the IAF; Air wing should need to be limited to the ALH, LCH, LOH, MLH, Heavy Lift choppers. We are going to hit others like what unkil is doing; For a small scale conflict this is enough; Incase of war IAF will co-ordinate with the IA.

 

[ZOOM]

Having a dedicated Aviation Wing for the exclusive purpose of Indian Army is very herculen task as it has a several Integration and operational challenges need to cope with. When it comes to Aviation wing, we always tend to corner oursleves of having some Combact Aircraft dedicated for such task in order to provide close air support, but Air Traffic Management, Air Space Control and Denial are lot harder task to integrate with present establishment then having a Combact Aircraft for CAS purpose. In my opinion, IA can do a world of good by having its dedicated Transport Division made up of Fixed wing and Rotary wings.

Major reason for not having dedicated Aviation wing for IA is lack of coordination, absense of state of the art technology of each others position as well as proper communication and control system to command operational work. It would be highly advisable of having Survelliance System to be shifted to IA so that it can have rapid response time to deal with the emerging threat in coordination with IAF. Importance is not as how we will have dedicated Air wing to undertake the task with freedom but having Joint Coordination among the forces to deal with Situation at hand efficiently else there is no point in having such wing if such coordination is lacking.

 

[prateikf]

the army is unable to get the 197 helicopter's it so desperately need's. it is short of 3600 howitzer's and lacks about 400000 close quarter rifles. under these circumstances it would be impossible for the army to have it's own aviation wing as no one in the MOD would approve of it.

 

[Yatharth Singh]

It will be ok for the IA to operate the rotary wing flying machine rather than a fixed one for that only we are having the IAF; Air wing should need to be limited to the ALH, LCH, LOH, MLH, Heavy Lift choppers. We are going to hit others like what unkil is doing; For a small scale conflict this is enough; Incase of war IAF will co-ordinate with the IA.

Mate, we(I and Kunal Biswasand some other) had a long discussion on your point in this thread only. I supported what you are saying but after a long debate and keeping the experience of KB, I agreed that IA should have its own light/small jets for CAS to its personnels.

 

[Parthy]

Discussion on Indian Military Aviation Wing

Hi,

Anybody have any update on combat aircraft field trials??


As per I know, Chinook and Apache AH64 D block is on field trials..

 

[Parthy]

Indian Air Force conducting trials for attack helicopters

New Delhi, July 22 (IANS) Trials are underway for an Indian Air Force (IAF) order for 22 attack helicopters with two contenders in the fray - the US' Boeing AH-64D Apache and Russia's Mi-28.
According to IAF sources, the trials began in the hot deserts of Jaisalmer in Rajasthan last week and will be followed by similar gruelling tests in the icy Himalayan heights of Ladakh in Jammu and Kashmir.

The sources said the competitors will demonstrate high altitude flight capability and maneuverability in Ladakh early next month.

They said the IAF requires a helicopter that is twin-engined with high maneuverability, adequate armour and all-weather and all-terrain capability.

The US and Russian helicopters were left in the fray after two major competitors from Europe - the Eurocopter Tiger and the AgustaWestland A129 Mangusta - pulled out of the contest citing technical reasons.

The IAF urgently needs a new fleet of attack helicopters as its

Mi-25s are being phased out.

The $550 million-tender to replace the ageing helicopter fleet was issued last year. The tender had actually been released in early 2008 to six contenders - Sikorsky for the Black Hawk, Boeing for the Apache AH 64D, Bell for the Super Cobra (all three from the US), Eurocopter for the Tiger, Russian Mil for the Mi28 and

AugustaWestland for the Mangusta.

Sikorski and Bell did not compete due to what they said were time constraints and procedural bottlenecks within their country.

The Mi-28 is an all-weather day-night two-seater anti-armour attack helicopter. It carries a single gun in an undernose barbette, plus external loads carried on pylons beneath stub wings. It has two heavily armoured cockpits. Its engines are two 2,200 hp Isotov TV-3-117VM (t/n 014) gas turbines.

The Boeing AH-64D Apache is a four-blade, twin-engine attack helicopter with tailwheel-type landing gear and a tandem cockpit for a crew of two. It is adaptable to numerous roles within its context as a close combat attack craft and has a customisable weapons payload.

Boeing has also developed capability in the Apache to control unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). While so far this ability is restricted to control over a single UAV, the company is building systems to allow airborne control over multiple UAVs. But this has not been offered to or requested by the IAF.

The sources said test field trials to select a heavy lift helicopter for the IAF will begin next month and the same US and Russian companies will be in race. Boeing's Chinook, which operates for NATO forces in Afghanistan, will compete with Russian Mi-26 for the deal for 15 heavy-lift choppers.

The IAF is looking to replace the ageing lot of the previous generation Mi-26s inducted in the mid 1980's.

The Chinook, which has contra-rotating twin-rotors to withstand rough weather, is being used extensively in Afghanistan to maintain steady supplies to the troops. It can also carry artillery guns slung under its belly to be dropped off at inaccessible locations.

http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal...-trials-for-attack-helicopters_100400224.html

 

[maomao]

Should India Buy A-10 Thunderbolt-2 for Close Air Support and Anti-Maoist operations?

The question I have been asking myself for a long time is that should India go for something like A-10 warthog, to support its invading ground troops and providing them required fire power in the event of a stalemate or providing them instant cover in the event of an adversary having greater capabilities, such has tank support and other armored vehicles against entrenched India soldiers in bunkers. We may look at the capabilities of A-10 in the context of anti-maoist and other mop-up operations. I believe 40-50 Warthogs could come in handy, if provided to Indian Army in conducting operations with Brilliance.

 

[maomao]

A-10 Thunderbolt-2


The A-10 Thunderbolt II is an American single-seat, twin-engine, straight-wing jet aircraft developed by Fairchild-Republic in the early 1970s. The A-10 was designed for a United States Air Force requirement to provide close air support (CAS) for ground forces by attacking tanks, armored vehicles, and other ground targets with a limited air interdiction capability. It is the first U.S. Air Force aircraft designed exclusively for close air support.[3]

The A-10 was designed around the GAU-8 Avenger, a heavy automatic cannon which forms the aircraft's primary armament. The aircraft's hull incorporates over 1,200 pounds (540 kg) of armor and was designed with survivability as a priority, with protective measures in place which enable the aircraft to continue flying even after taking significant damage.
The A-10's official name comes from the Republic P-47 Thunderbolt of World War II, a fighter that was particularly effective at close air support. The A-10 is more commonly known by its nickname "Warthog" or simply "Hog".[4] As a secondary mission, it provides airborne forward air control, guiding other aircraft against ground targets. A-10s used primarily in this role are designated OA-10.[5] The A-10 is expected to be replaced in 2028 or later.

Development

[edit]Background
Criticism that the U.S. Air Force did not take close air support seriously prompted a few service members to seek a specialized attack aircraft.[6] In the Vietnam War, large numbers of ground-attack aircraft were shot down by small arms, surface-to-air missiles, and low-level anti-aircraft gunfire, prompting the development of an aircraft better able to survive such weapons. In addition, the UH-1 Iroquois and AH-1 Cobra helicopters of the day, which USAF commanders had said should handle close air support, were ill-suited for use against armor, carrying only anti-personnel machine guns and unguided rockets meant for soft targets. Fast jets such as the F-100 Super Sabre, F-105 Thunderchief and F-4 Phantom II proved for the most part to be ineffective for close air support. The A-1 Skyraider was the USAF's primary close air support aircraft.[7]
[edit]A-X
In 1966 the U.S. Air Force formed the Attack Experimental (A-X) program office.[8] On 6 March 1967, the Air Force released a request for information to 21 defense contractors for the A-X. The objective was to create a design study for a low-cost attack aircraft. The officer in charge of the project was Colonel Avery Kay.[6] In 1969, the Secretary of the Air Force asked Pierre Sprey to write the detailed specifications for the proposed A-X project. However, his initial involvement was kept secret because of Sprey's earlier controversial involvement in the F-X project.[6] Sprey's discussions with A-1 Skyraider pilots operating in Vietnam and analysis of the effectiveness of current aircraft used in the role indicated the ideal aircraft should have long loiter time, low-speed maneuverability, massive cannon firepower, and extreme survivability;[6] an aircraft that had the best elements of the Ilyushin Il-2, Henschel Hs 129 and Skyraider. The specifications also demanded that the aircraft cost less than $3 million.[6] Input on the design was later provided by famed World War II attack pilot Hans-Ulrich Rudel.[9]
In May 1970, the USAF issued a modified and much more detailed request for proposals (RFP) for the aircraft. The threat of Soviet armored forces and all-weather attack operations had became more serious. Now included in the requirements was that the aircraft would be designed specifically for the 30 mm cannon. The RFP also specified an aircraft with a maximum speed of 460 mph (740 km/h), takeoff distance of 4,000 feet (1,200 m), external load of 16,000 pounds (7,300 kg), 285-mile (460 km) mission radius, and a unit cost of US$1.4 million.[10] During this time, a sperarate RFP was released for A-X's 30 mm cannon with requirements for a high rate of fire (4,000 round/minute) and a high muzzle velocity.[11]
Six companies submitted proposals to the USAF, with Northrop and Fairchild Republic selected to build prototypes: the YA-9A and YA-10A, respectively. General Electric and Philco-Ford were selected to build and test GAU-8 cannon prototypes.[12]
The YA-10A first flew on 10 May 1972. After trials and a fly-off against the YA-9A, the Air Force announced its selection of Fairchild-Republic's YA-10A on 18 January 1973 for production.[13] General Electric was selected to build the GAU-8 cannon in June 1973.[14] The YA-10 had an additional fly-off in 1974 against the Ling-Temco-Vought A-7D Corsair II, the principal Air Force attack aircraft at the time, in order to prove the need to purchase a new attack aircraft. The first production A-10 flew in October 1975, and deliveries to the Air Force commenced in March 1976. In total, 715 airplanes were produced, the last delivered in 1984.[15]
One experimental two-seat A-10 Night Adverse Weather (N/AW) version was built by converting an A-10A.[16] The N/AW was developed by Fairchild from the first Demonstration Testing and Evaluation (DT&E) A-10 for consideration by the USAF. It included a second seat for a weapons system officer responsible for electronic countermeasures (ECM), navigation and target acquisition. The variant was canceled, and the only two-seat A-10 built now resides at Edwards Air Force Base awaiting a spot in the Flight Test Historical Foundation museum.[17] The N/AW version did not interest the USAF or export customers. The two-seat trainer version was ordered by the Air Force in 1981, but funding was canceled by U.S. Congress and was the jet was not produced.[18]
[edit]Upgrades



The A-10 has received many upgrades over the years. Aircraft added the Pave Penny laser receiver pod beginning in 1978. It senses reflected laser radiation from a laser designator on a target for faster and more accurate target identification.[19][20][21] The A-10 began receiving an inertial navigation system in 1980.[22] Later, the Low-Altitude Safety and Targeting Enhancement (LASTE) upgrade provided computerized weapon-aiming equipment, an autopilot, and a ground-collision warning system. The A-10 is now compatible with night vision goggles for low-light operation. In 1999, aircraft began to receive Global Positioning System navigation systems and a new multi-function display.[23] Its LASTE system is being upgraded with the Integrated Flight & Fire Control Computers (IFFCC).[24]
In 2005, the entire A-10 fleet also began receiving the Precision Engagement upgrades that include an improved fire control system (FCS), electronic countermeasures (ECM), and the ability to aim smart bombs. The aircraft that receive this upgrade are redesignated A-10C. The A-10 will receive a service life extension program (SLEP) upgrade with many receiving new wings.[25] A contract to build 242 new A-10 wing sets was awarded to Boeing in June 2007.[26] In July 2010, the USAF issued Raytheon a contract to integrate a Helmet Mounted Integrated Targeting (HMIT) system into A-10Cs.[27]
The Government Accounting Office in 2007 estimated the cost of upgrading, refurbishing, and service life extension plans for the A-10 force to total $2.25 billion through 2013.[3] Modifications to provide precision weapons capability are well underway.[27] The Air Force Material Command's Ogden Air Logistics Center at Hill AFB, Utah completed work on its 100th A-10 precision engagement upgrade in January 2008.[28] The C model upgrades are to be completed in 2011.[29]
[edit]Design

Overview


A-10 inboard profile drawing
The A-10 has superior maneuverability at low speeds and altitude because of its large wing area, high wing aspect ratio, and large ailerons. The large high aspect ratio wing also allows for short takeoffs and landings, permitting operations from primitive forward airfields near front lines. The aircraft can loiter for extended periods of time and operate under 1,000 ft (300 m) ceilings with 1.5 mi (2.4 km) visibility. It typically flies at a relatively slow speed of 300 knots (560 km/h; 350 mph), which makes it a much better platform for the ground-attack role than fast fighter-bombers, which often have difficulty targeting small and slow-moving targets.[7]
Engine exhaust passes over the aircraft's horizontal stabilizer and between the twin tails, decreasing the A-10's infrared signature and lowering the likelihood that the aircraft can be targeted by heat-seeking missiles. The placement of the engines behind the wings partially shields them from anti-aircraft fire.[30] The leading edge of the wing is honeycomb panel construction to provide strength with minimal weight compromise. Honeycomb panels of this type on the A-10 include the flap shrouds, elevators, rudders and other sections of the fins.[31]


An A-10A of pre-glass cockpit design
The A-10 has integrally machined skin panels. Because the stringers are integral with the skin there are no join or seal problems. These panels, fabricated using computer controlled machining, reduce the time and hence the cost of production. Combat experience has shown that this type of panel is more resistant to damage. The skin is not load-bearing, so damaged skin sections can be easily replaced in the field, with makeshift materials if necessary.[32]
The ailerons are at the far ends of the wings to gain greater rolling moment, as with many aircraft, but there are two distinguishing features. The ailerons are larger than is typical, almost 50% of the chord, providing improved control even at slow speeds. The aileron is also split, making it a deceleron.[33][34]
The Thunderbolt II can be serviced and operated from bases with limited facilities near battle areas. An unusual feature is that many of the aircraft's parts are interchangeable between the left and right sides, including the engines, main landing gear, and vertical stabilizers. The sturdy landing gear, low-pressure tires and large, straight wings allow operation from short rough strips even with a heavy ordnance load, allowing the aircraft to operate from damaged airbases. If runways are damaged in an attack, the A-10 can operate from taxiways or straight roadway sections such as Germany's autobahn.[35] The aircraft is designed to be refueled, rearmed, and serviced with minimal equipment.[36] Also, most repairs can be done in the field.[37]


Front view of an A-10 showing the 30 mm cannon and offset front landing gear
The front landing gear is offset to the aircraft's right to allow placement of the 30 mm cannon with its firing barrel along the centerline of the aircraft.[38] During ground taxi, the offset front landing gear causes the A-10 to have dissimilar turning radii. Turning to the right on the ground takes less distance than turning left.[Note 1]
[edit]Durability


This A-10 Thunderbolt II suffered extensive damage over Baghdad during Operation Iraqi Freedom in early 2003, but still made it back to base
The A-10 is exceptionally tough. Its strong airframe can survive direct hits from armor-piercing and high-explosive projectiles up to 23 mm. The aircraft has triple redundancy in its flight systems, with mechanical systems to back up double-redundant hydraulic systems. This permits pilots to fly and land when hydraulic power or part of a wing is lost. Flight without hydraulic power uses the manual reversion flight control system; this engages automatically for pitch and yaw control, and under pilot control (manual reversion switch) for roll control. In manual reversion mode, the A-10 is sufficiently controllable under favorable conditions to return to base and land, though control forces are much higher than normal. The aircraft is designed to fly with one engine, one tail, one elevator and half a wing torn off.[39] Its self-sealing fuel tanks are protected by fire-retardant foam.[40] The A-10's main landing gear is designed so that the wheels semi-protrude from their nacelles when the gear is retracted so as to make gear-up landings (belly landing) easier to control and less damaging to the aircraft's underside. Additionally, the landing gear are all hinged toward the rear of the aircraft, so if hydraulic power is lost the pilot can drop the gear and a combination of gravity and wind resistance will open and lock the gear in place.[34]
The cockpit and parts of the flight-control system are protected by 1,200 lb (540 kg) of titanium armor, referred to as a "bathtub",[41][42] a concept known to have been pioneered by the World War I German Junkers J.I armored-fuselage all-metal biplane, and more famously used in the World War II Soviet Ilyushin Il-2 Shturmovik ground-attack aircraft.[citation needed] The armor has been tested to withstand strikes from 23 mm cannon fire and some strikes from 57 mm rounds.[41] It is made up of titanium plates with thicknesses from 0.5 to 1.5 inches (13 to 38 mm) determined by a study of likely trajectories and deflection angles. This protection comes at a cost, with the armor making up almost 6% of the aircraft's empty weight. To protect the pilot from the fragmentation likely to be created from impact of a shell, any interior surface of the tub that is directly exposed to the pilot is covered by a multi-layer nylon spall shield.[40][43] In addition, the front windscreen and canopy are resistant to small arms fire.[44]
Proof of the durability of the A-10 was shown when Captain Kim Campbell, flying a ground support mission over Baghdad during the 2003 invasion of Iraq on 7 April, suffered extensive flak damage to her A-10. Enemy fire damaged one of the A-10's engines and crippled its hydraulic system, which required the aircraft's stabilizer and flight controls to be operated via the back-up mechanical system. Despite this, Campbell managed to fly the aircraft for an hour and landed it safely at the air base in manual reversion mode.[45][46][47]
[edit]Powerplant


USAF Thunderbolt taxiing
There are several reasons for the unusual location of the A-10's General Electric TF34-GE-100 turbofan engines. First, the A-10 was expected to fly from forward air bases, often with semi-prepared substandard runways that presented a high risk of foreign object damage to the engines. The height of the engines lowers the chance that sand or stones will enter the inlet. This also allows engines to remain running, allowing for shorter servicing and rearming turn-around times by ground crew. Servicing and rearming are further helped by having wings closer to the ground than would be possible if the engines were wing-mounted. The position also reduces the infrared signature further, which is already low because of the engines' 6:1 bypass ratio. Because of engines' high position, they are angled upward nine degrees to bring the combined thrust line closer to the aerodynamic center of the aircraft. This avoids trimming measures to counteract a nose-down pitching moment if the engines were parallel to the fuselage. The heavy engines require strong supports, so their pylons are connected to the airframe by four bolts.[48]
The A-10's fuel system components are protected in multiple ways. All four fuel tanks are near the center of the aircraft, reducing the likelihood that they will be hit or separated from the engines. The tanks are separate from the fuselage; thus, projectiles would need to penetrate the skin before reaching the tank.[40][43] The refueling system is purged after use so that all fuel in the aircraft is protected.[49] All fuel transfer lines self-seal if they are compromised. Most of the fuel system components are inside the tanks so that if a leak were to occur from the component the fuel would not be lost. If a tank does get damaged, check valves ensure that fuel does not flow into the compromised tank. Most importantly, reticulated polyurethane foam lines both the inner and outer sides of the fuel tanks, retaining debris and restricting fuel spillage in the event of damage. The other source of possible combustion, the engines, are shielded from the fuel system and the rest of the airframe by firewalls and fire extinguishing equipment. Even in the event of all four main tanks being penetrated and all contents lost, sufficient fuel is carried in two self-sealing sump tanks to allow flight for 230 miles (370 km).[40][43]
[edit]Weapon systems


A side-view drawing of the A-10's GAU-8/A Avenger gun and its approximate location in the fuselage
Although the A-10 can carry considerable disposable stores, its primary built-in weapon is the 30 mm GAU-8/A Avenger Gatling-type cannon.[50] One of the most powerful aircraft cannon ever flown, it fires large depleted uranium armor-piercing shells. In the original design, the pilot could switch between two rates of fire: 2,100 or 4,200 rounds per minute;[51] this was changed to a fixed rate of 3,900 rounds per minute.[52] The cannon takes about half a second to come up to speed, so 50 rounds are fired during the first second, 65 or 70 rounds per second thereafter. The gun is precise; it can place 80% of its shots within a 40-foot (12.4 m) circle from 4,000 feet (1,220 m) while in flight.[53] The GAU-8 is optimized for a slant range of 4,000 feet (1,220 m) with the A-10 in a 30 degree dive.[54]


Another view of the A-10's GAU-8 installation
The fuselage of the aircraft is built around the gun.[55] The gun's firing barrel is placed at the 9 o'clock position so it is aligned on the aircraft's centerline. The gun's ammunition drum can hold up to 1,350 rounds of 30 mm ammunition,[38] but generally holds 1,174 rounds.[54] The damage caused by rounds firing prematurely from impact of an explosive shell would be catastrophic, so a great deal of effort has been taken to protect the 5 feet 11.5 inch (1.816 m) long drum.[38] There are many armor plates of differing thicknesses between the aircraft skin and the drum, to detonate an incoming shell before it reaches the drum.[43] A final layer of armor around the drum protects it from fragmentation damage. The gun is loaded by Syn-Tech's linked tube carrier GFU-7/E 30 mm ammunition loading assembly cart.


A-10 Thunderbolt II, fully loaded
Another commonly used weapon is the AGM-65 Maverick air-to-surface missile, with different variations for either electro-optical (TV-guided) or infrared targeting. The Maverick allows targets to be engaged at much greater ranges than the cannon, a safer proposition in the face of modern anti-aircraft systems. During Desert Storm, in the absence of dedicated forward-looking infrared (FLIR) cameras, the Maverick's infrared camera was used for night missions as a "poor man's FLIR".[56] Other weapons include cluster bombs and Hydra rocket pods.[57] Although the A-10 is equipped to carry laser-guided bombs, their use is relatively uncommon.[58] The A-10 has not been equipped with weapon control systems for accurate bombing.[19] A-10s usually fly with an ALQ-131 ECM pod under one wing and two AIM-9 Sidewinder air-to-air missiles under the other wing for self-defense.[59]
[edit]Modernization
The A-10 Precision Engagement Modification Program will update 356 A-10/OA-10s to the A-10C variant with a new flight computer, new glass cockpit displays and controls, two new 5.5-inch (140 mm) color displays with moving map function and an integrated digital stores management system.[3][27]
Other funded improvements to the A-10 fleet include a new data link, the ability to employ smart weapons such as the Joint Direct Attack Munition ("JDAM") and Wind Corrected Munitions Dispensor, and the ability to carry an integrated targeting pod such as the Northrop Grumman LITENING targeting pod or the Lockheed Martin Sniper XR Advanced Targeting Pod (ATP). Also included is the ROVER or remotely operated video enhanced receiver to provide sensor data to personnel on the ground.[29]
[edit]Colors and markings
Since the A-10 flies low to the ground and at subsonic speed, aircraft camouflage is important to make the aircraft more difficult to see. Many different types of paint schemes have been tried. These have included a "peanut scheme" of sand, yellow and field drab; black and white colors for winter operations and a tan, green and brown mixed pattern.[60]
The two most common markings applied to the A-10 have been the European I woodland camouflage scheme and a two-tone gray scheme. The European woodland scheme was designed to minimize visibility from above, as the threat from hostile fighter aircraft was felt to outweigh that from ground-fire. It uses dark green, medium green and dark gray in order to blend in with the typical European forest terrain and was used from the 1980s to the early 1990s. Following the end of the Cold War, and based on experience during the 1991 Gulf War, the air-to-air threat was no longer seen to be as important as that from ground fire, and a new color scheme known as "Compass Ghost" was chosen to minimise visibility from below. This two-tone gray scheme has darker gray color on top, with the lighter gray on the underside of the aircraft, and started to be applied from the early 1990s.[61]
Many A-10s also featured a "false" canopy painted in dark gray on the underside of the aircraft, just behind the gun. This form of automimicry is an attempt to confuse the enemy as to aircraft attitude and maneuver direction.[62][63]
[edit]Operational history

[edit]Introduction


A-10 Thunderbolt II firing off an AGM-65 on one of the Eglin AFB weapons ranges.
The first unit to receive the A-10 Thunderbolt II was the 355th Tactical Training Wing, based at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Arizona, in March 1976. The first unit to achieve full combat-readiness was the 354th Tactical Fighter Wing at Myrtle Beach AFB, South Carolina, in 1978. Deployments of A-10As followed at bases both at home and abroad, including England AFB, Louisiana; Eielson AFB, Alaska; Osan Air Base, South Korea; and RAF Bentwaters/RAF Woodbridge, England. The 81st TFW of RAF Bentwaters/RAF Woodbridge operated rotating detachments of A-10s at four bases in Germany known as Forward Operating Locations (FOLs): Leipheim, Sembach Air Base, Nörvenich, and Ahlhorn.[64]
A-10s were initially an unwelcome addition to many in the Air Force. Most pilots switching to the A-10 did not want to because fighter pilots traditionally favored speed and appearance.[65] In 1987, many A-10s were shifted to the forward air control (FAC) role and redesignated OA-10.[5] In the FAC role the OA-10 is typically equipped with up to six pods of 2.75 inch (70 mm) Hydra rockets, usually with smoke or white phosphorus warheads used for target marking. OA-10s are physically unchanged and remain fully combat capable despite the redesignation.[66]
[edit]Gulf War


USAF A-10A during Desert Storm with Pave Penny pod under front fuselage.
The A-10 was used in combat for the first time during the Gulf War in 1991, destroying more than 900 Iraqi tanks, 2,000 military vehicles, and 1,200 artillery pieces. A-10s shot down two Iraqi helicopters with the GAU-8 cannon. The first one of these was an Iraqi helicopter shot down by Captain Robert Swain over Kuwait occurred on 6 February 1991, marking the A-10's first air-to-air victory.[67] Four A-10s were shot down during the war, all by surface-to-air missiles. Another three battle-damaged A-10s and OA-10As returned to base but were written off, some sustaining additional damage in crashed landings.[68][69][70] The A-10 had a mission capable rate of 95.7%, flew 8,100 sorties, and launched 90% of the AGM-65 Maverick missiles fired in the conflict.[71] Shortly after the Gulf War, the Air Force gave up on the idea of replacing the A-10 with a close air support version of the F-16.[72]
[edit]Bosnia and Kosovo


An A-10A during a NATO Operation Allied Force mission
U.S. Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt II aircraft fired approximately 10,000 30 mm rounds in Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1994-1995. Following the seizure of some heavy weapons by Bosnian Serbs from a warehouse in Ilidža, a series of sorties were launched to locate and destroy the captured equipment. On 5 August 1994, two A-10s located and strafed an anti-tank vehicle. Afterwards, the Serbs agreed to return remaining heavy weapons.[73] In August 1995, NATO launched an offensive called Operation Deliberate Force. A-10s flew close air support missions, attacking Serbian artillery and positions. In late September A-10s began flying patrols again.[74]
A-10s returned to the region as part of Operation Allied Force in Kosovo beginning in March 1999.[74] In March 1999, A-10s escorted and supported search and rescue helicopters in finding a downed F-117 pilot.[75] The A-10s were deployed to support search and rescue missions. But the Warthogs began to receive more ground attack missions as the days passed. The A-10's first successful attack in Operation Allied Force happened on 6 April 1999. A-10s remained until combat ended in late June 1999.[76]
[edit]Afghanistan and Iraq Wars
During the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan, A-10s did not take part in the initial stages. For the campaign against Taliban and Al Qaeda, A-10 squadrons were deployed to Pakistan and Bagram Air Base, Afghanistan, beginning in March 2002. These A-10s participated in Operation Anaconda. Afterwards, A-10s remained in-country, fighting Taliban and Al Qaeda remnants.[77]


A-10s at Tallil Air Base, Iraq from 442nd Fighter Wing from Whiteman Air Force Base, MO in 2009
Operation Iraqi Freedom began on 20 March 2003. Sixty OA-10/A-10 aircraft took part in early combat there.[78] United States Air Forces Central issued Operation Iraqi Freedom: By the Numbers, a declassified report about the aerial campaign in the conflict on 30 April 2003. The A-10s had a mission capable rate of 85% in the war and fired 311,597 rounds of 30 mm ammunition. A single A-10 was shot down near Baghdad International Airport by Iraqi fire late in the campaign. The A-10 also flew 32 missions in which the aircraft dropped propaganda leaflets over Iraq.[79]
The A-10C first deployed to Iraq in the third quarter of 2007 with the 104th Fighter Squadron of the Maryland Air National Guard. The jets include the Precision Engagement Upgrade.[80] The A-10C's digital avionics and communications systems have greatly reduced the time to acquire a close air support target and attack it.[81]
On 25 March 2010, an A-10 conducted the first flight of an aircraft with all engines powered by a biofuel blend. The flight, performed at Eglin Air Force Base, used a 1:1 blend of JP-8 and Camelina-based fuel.[82]
The A-10 is scheduled to be in service with the USAF until 2028 and possibly later,[83] when it may be replaced by the F-35 Lightning II.[25]
[edit]Variants



A newly updated A-10C arrives at Davis-Monthan AFB, 29 November 2006.
YA-10A
Pre-production variant. 12 were built.[84]
A-10A
Single-seat close air support, ground-attack version.
OA-10A
A-10As used for airborne forward air control.
YA-10B Night/Adverse Weather
Two-seat experimental prototype, for work at night and in bad weather. The one YA-10B prototype was converted from a A-10A.[85]
A-10C
A-10As updated under the incremental Precision Engagement (PE) program.[29]
[edit]Operators



An A-10 Thunderbolt II banks left after refueling
The A-10 has been flown exclusively by the United States Air Force and its Air Reserve components, the Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) and the Air National Guard (ANG). The USAF operated 335 A-10 and OA-10 aircraft (188 in active duty, 96 in ANG, and 51 in AFRC, all variants) as of September 2008.[86]
The Air Force operates multiple A-10/OA-10 Active, National Guard, and Reserve squadrons.
United States Air Force
23d Wing: Moody Air Force Base, Georgia
74th Fighter Squadron
75th Fighter Squadron
51st Fighter Wing: Osan Air Base, South Korea
25th Fighter Squadron
52d Fighter Wing: Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany
81st Fighter Squadron
53d Wing: Eglin Air Force Base, Florida
422d Test and Evaluation Squadron (Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada)
57th Wing: Nellis AFB, Nevada
66th Weapons Squadron
355th Wing: Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Arizona
354th Fighter Squadron
357th Fighter Squadron
358th Fighter Squadron


Four A-10s of the 111th Fighter Wing, Pennsylvania Air National Guard, fly in formation during a refueling mission.
Air National Guard
127th Wing at Selfridge ANGB, Michigan (Transitioned from F-16s to A-10s due to BRAC 2005)
107th Fighter Squadron
111th Fighter Wing: NAS JRB Willow Grove/Willow Grove ARS, Pennsylvania (BRAC 2005 currently sees unit losing aircraft in 2012)
103d Fighter Squadron
122nd Fighter Wing (formerly 358th Fighter Group): Fort Wayne Indiana
124th Wing: Boise Air Terminal, Idaho
190th Fighter Squadron
175th Wing: Warfield ANGB, Martin State Airport, Maryland
104th Fighter Squadron
188th Fighter Wing: Fort Smith, Arkansas (Transitioned from F-16s to A-10s due to BRAC 2005)
Air Force Reserve Command
442d Fighter Wing: Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri
76th Fighter Squadron (Geographically Separated Unit (GSU) at Moody AFB, Georgia)
303d Fighter Squadron
917th Wing: Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana
45th Fighter Squadron (GSU at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Arizona)
47th Fighter Squadron
[edit]Former operators
United States Air Force
81st Training Wing: operated A-10s during 1978–1993
355th Fighter Squadron: part of current 354th Fighter Wing, Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska (squadron inactivated 2007)
Air Force Reserve Command
926th Fighter Wing: NAS JRB New Orleans, Louisiana
706th Fighter Squadron (wing and squadron deactivated 2007 due to BRAC 2005)
Air National Guard
103d Fighter Wing: Bradley ANGB, Connecticut (BRAC 2005 removed A-10 aircraft, redesignated as 103d Airlift Wing and given C-21 in 2007)
118th Fighter Squadron (resdesignated 118th Airlift Squadron per BRAC 2005)
104th Fighter Wing: Barnes ANGB, Massachusetts (BRAC 2005 saw unit transition from A-10 to F-15C in 2007)
131st Fighter Squadron
[edit]Specifications (A-10A)




Close up of the A-10's 30 mm GAU-8 Avenger cannon


The Pave Penny pod


An A-10 firing its 30 mm GAU-8 Gatling gun during testing
Data from The Great Book of Modern Warplanes,[87] Fairchild-Republic A/OA-10[88]
General characteristics
Crew: 1
Length: 53 ft 4 in (16.26 m)
Wingspan: 57 ft 6 in (17.53 m)
Height: 14 ft 8 in (4.47 m)
Wing area: 506 ft² (47.0 m²)
Airfoil: NACA 6716 root, NACA 6713 tip
Empty weight: 24,959 lb (11,321 kg)
Loaded weight: 30,384 lb (13,782 kg)) On CAS mission: 47,094 lb (21,361 kg)
On anti-armor mission: 42,071 lb (19,083 kg
Max takeoff weight: 50,000 lb (23,000 kg)
Powerplant: 2× General Electric TF34-GE-100A turbofans, 9,065 lbf (40.32 kN) each
Performance
Never exceed speed: 450 knots (518 mph,[88] 833 km/h) at 5,000 ft (1,500 m) with 18 Mk 82 bombs[89]
Maximum speed: 381 knots (439 mph, 706 km/h) at sea level, clean[88]
Cruise speed: 300 knots (340 mph, 560 km/h)
Stall speed: 120 knots (138 mph, 220 km/h) [90]
Combat radius:
On CAS mission: 250 nmi (288 mi, 460 km) at 1.88 hour single-engine loiter at 5,000 ft (1,500 m), 10 min combat
On anti-armor mission: 252 nmi (290 mi, 467 km), 40 nm (45 mi, 75 km) sea-level penetration and exit, 30 min combat
Ferry range: 2,240 nmi (2,580 mi, 4,150 km) with 50 knot (55 mph, 90 km/h) headwinds, 20 minutes reserve
Service ceiling: 45,000 ft (13,700 m)
Rate of climb: 6,000 ft/min (30 m/s)
Wing loading: 99 lb/ft² (482 kg/m²)
Thrust/weight: 0.36
Armament
Guns: 1× 30 mm (1.18 in) GAU-8/A Avenger gatling cannon with 1,174 rounds
Hardpoints: 11 (8× under-wing and 3× under-fuselage pylon stations) with a capacity of 16,000 lb (7,260 kg) and provisions to carry combinations of:
Rockets:
4× LAU-61/LAU-68 rocket pods (each with 19× / 7× Hydra 70 mm rockets, respectively)
4× LAU-5003 rocket pods (each with 19× CRV7 70 mm rockets)
6× LAU-10 rocket pods (each with 4× 127 mm (5.0 in) Zuni rockets)
Missiles:
2× AIM-9 Sidewinders air-to-air missiles for self-defense
8× AGM-65 Maverick air-to-surface missiles
Bombs:
Mark 80 series of unguided iron bombs or
Mk 77 incendiary bombs or
BLU-1, BLU-27/B Rockeye II, Mk20, BL-755[91] and CBU-52/58/71/87/89/97 cluster bombs or
Paveway series of Laser-guided bombs or
Joint Direct Attack Munition (A-10C)[92] or
Wind Corrected Munitions Dispenser (A-10C)
Other:
SUU-42A/A Flares/Infrared decoys and chaff dispenser pod or
AN/ALQ-131 & AN/ALQ-184 ECM pods or
Lockheed Martin Sniper XR & LITENING targeting pods (A-10C) or
2× 600 US gallon Sargent Fletcher drop tanks for extended range/loitering time.
Avionics
AN/AAS-35(V) Pave Penny laser tracker pod[93] (mounted beneath right side of cockpit) for use with Paveway LGBs
Head-up display (HUD) for improved technical flying and air-to-ground support.[94]
[edit]Nicknames

The A-10 Thunderbolt II received its popular nickname "Warthog" from the pilots and crews of the USAF attack squadrons who flew and maintained it. The A-10 is the last of Republic's jet attack aircraft to serve with the USAF. The Republic F-84 Thunderjet was nicknamed the "Hog", F-84F Thunderstreak nicknamed "Superhog", and the Republic F-105 Thunderchief tagged "Ultra Hog".[4] A less common nickname is the "Tankbuster".[95] The saying Go Ugly Early has been associated with the aircraft in reference to calling in the A-10 early in combat.[96]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairchild_Republic_A-10_Thunderbolt_II

 

[vishal_lionheart]

It will be GREAT deal instead of F 18 e/f

 

[Kunal Biswas]

A-10 is good but require high maintenance and also expensive..
Army Aviation should be expand and for me i like Super Tucano as these are turbo props and can land/takeoff from anywhere, operational cost is 1/4th of a T-72 tank, And for high altitude PGM strike we should have at least half a squadron of HAWK/AJT-36 sitara..

Some threads related to this one:
http://www.defenceforum.in/forum/showthread.php?t=14807
http://www.defenceforum.in/forum/showthread.php?t=1332

 

[plugwater]

^^^ yes, Hawk is good enough for us. I have seen a picture of IAF hawk with rocket pods so i guess they have already started using it for CAS role.

 

[maomao]

I doubt Trainers will ever be assigned CAS role, a dedicated and proven platform should be used for this role, though in small numbers but a proven platform not something like HAWK, if thats the case then I think MIG-27 is zillion times better than Hawk for CAS operations. CAS role needs to be performed by an A/C which is developed for this particular role.

 

[Kunal Biswas]

^^^ yes, Hawk is good enough for us. I have seen a picture of IAF hawk with rocket pods so i guess they have already started using it for CAS role.

HAWK are only use for Training in IAF, Hawks can use Russian and Indian Rocket pods and Dumb bombs possible lightning pod and LBGs, But for now no-one seems interested in up-gradation of Army -aviation..