K9s were procured for plains and deserts (western front). In 2020 we tried out K9s in Ladakh (there were multiple firing trials), and found out they are pretty good there as well, and given China's conventional superiority in Ladakh, made it a necessity to deploy them there.These corrupt MFers, endless trials for ATAGS, waivers for K9
Anyway 300 K9/15 regiments is a decent size for the 2 fronts but where are the 814 MGS?
The K9 for deserts and plains point is a little silly. IA might have wanted it for that but the South Koreans did also design it for the mountainous terrain with North Korea. Maybe not the Himalays exactly but not just for the plains.K9s were procured for plains and deserts (western front). In 2020 we tried out K9s in Ladakh (there were multiple firing trials), and found out they are pretty good there as well, and given China's conventional superiority in Ladakh, made it a necessity to deploy them there.
ATAGS, (or any other towed artillery in the Indian Army) is expected to perform on both plains and the Himalayas. While I am aware of excessive trials of ATAGS and in no way giving a free pass to the Indian Army, it makes little sense to pick up every small matter and twist it to look like corruption.
Also, 300 K9s are utterly inadequate. We should be moving towards more SPH not towed artilleries. We need at least 500 to balance both Pakistan and China. But I guess we will see more emergency purchases when the hell breaks loose finally.
But doesn't a 500 requirement overall, meaning 400 extra units or 300 if the new systems ordered are not included, warrant a local development for tracked sph which can in theory be handled pretty fast considering that gun is already available and feeding system has been localised by L&T.K9s were procured for plains and deserts (western front). In 2020 we tried out K9s in Ladakh (there were multiple firing trials), and found out they are pretty good there as well, and given China's conventional superiority in Ladakh, made it a necessity to deploy them there.
ATAGS, (or any other towed artillery in the Indian Army) is expected to perform on both plains and the Himalayas. While I am aware of excessive trials of ATAGS and in no way giving a free pass to the Indian Army, it makes little sense to pick up every small matter and twist it to look like corruption.
Also, 300 K9s are utterly inadequate. We should be moving towards more SPH not towed artilleries. We need at least 500 to balance both Pakistan and China. But I guess we will see more emergency purchases when the hell breaks loose finally.
Kalyani owner was saying they have capacity of one barrel per day . Such capability in itself is a huge advantage during war period . Some small things can be corrected later (if there is ) . Orders should be given at earliest .K9s were procured for plains and deserts (western front). In 2020 we tried out K9s in Ladakh (there were multiple firing trials), and found out they are pretty good there as well, and given China's conventional superiority in Ladakh, made it a necessity to deploy them there.
ATAGS, (or any other towed artillery in the Indian Army) is expected to perform on both plains and the Himalayas. While I am aware of excessive trials of ATAGS and in no way giving a free pass to the Indian Army, it makes little sense to pick up every small matter and twist it to look like corruption.
Also, 300 K9s are utterly inadequate. We should be moving towards more SPH not towed artilleries. We need at least 500 to balance both Pakistan and China. But I guess we will see more emergency purchases when the hell breaks loose finally.
The highest mountain in South Korea - 2744mThe K9 for deserts and plains point is a little silly. IA might have wanted it for that but the South Koreans did also design it for the mountainous terrain with North Korea. Maybe not the Himalays exactly but not just for the plains.
South Korea designed the K9 to operate on the rugged mountains of the demilitarized zone with North Korea, and accordingly gave it advanced hydropneumatics suspension to overcome the rocky terrain.
Bringing the Thunder: Why South Korea's K-9 Artillery Are No Joke
North Korea hates this.nationalinterest.org
Correct. We can in fact manage with 300 for now and order truck-mounted indigenous artilleries. But nobody knows when that will happen, or may even happen.But doesn't a 500 requirement overall, meaning 400 extra units or 300 if the new systems ordered are not included, warrant a local development for tracked sph which can in theory be handled pretty fast considering that gun is already available and feeding system has been localised by L&T.
If we are to go by recent trends any big number requirement is broken down in small emergency purchases + other numbers to filled through indigenious route. All this applies if K9 is not considered indigenious of some sort.
Anyway we should start working on self contained sph turrets like Russian Koatsilya or the new K9A2, these are self contained turrets with both ammo and charges fully automated without any crews in turret, basically a remote control artillery turret, that's the new direction nations seem to be working on.
Put it on a truckView attachment 173400
Or put it on a mbt hullView attachment 173401
Barrel yes, but what about engines, electronics, and other components which are imported from S.Korea?Kalyani owner was saying they have capacity of one barrel per day . Such capability in itself is a huge advantage during war period . Some small things can be corrected later (if there is ) . Orders should be given at earliest .
The highest mountain in South Korea - 2744m
Elevation of Leh, Indus River valley in general (which is as low as you get in Ladakh) - 3,500m
Elevation around which Indo-China fight likely to happen (Pangong Tso) - 4,225m
Rarefied, fluctuating temperature desert environment, the ballistic trajectory of the projectile changes within hours. Ease of movement on rocky terrain is not the only requirement for operation at high altitudes.
Kalyani, not L&T. Different systems.Barrel yes, but what about engines, electronics, and other components which are imported from S.Korea?
I was talking abt ATAGS . A mobile version is also under development.The highest mountain in South Korea - 2744m
Elevation of Leh, Indus River valley in general (which is as low as you get in Ladakh) - 3,500m
Elevation around which Indo-China fight likely to happen (Pangong Tso) - 4,225m
Rarefied, fluctuating temperature desert environment, the ballistic trajectory of the projectile changes within hours. Ease of movement on rocky terrain is not the only requirement for operation at high altitudes.
Correct. We can in fact manage with 300 for now and order truck-mounted indigenous artilleries. But nobody knows when that will happen, or may even happen.
But the requirement for mobility is a must. Get stuck on the modern battlefield and drones will find you in no time if a counter-artillery fire does not.
Barrel yes, but what about engines, electronics, and other components which are imported from S.Korea?
My point is that we see plenty of waivers for imports but IDDM items are expected to be all-weather and all sector products and kept in trails continuously until they are or rejected.K9s were procured for plains and deserts (western front). In 2020 we tried out K9s in Ladakh (there were multiple firing trials), and found out they are pretty good there as well, and given China's conventional superiority in Ladakh, made it a necessity to deploy them there.
ATAGS, (or any other towed artillery in the Indian Army) is expected to perform on both plains and the Himalayas. While I am aware of excessive trials of ATAGS and in no way giving a free pass to the Indian Army, it makes little sense to pick up every small matter and twist it to look like corruption.
Also, 300 K9s are utterly inadequate. We should be moving towards more SPH not towed artilleries. We need at least 500 to balance both Pakistan and China. But I guess we will see more emergency purchases when the hell breaks loose finally.
No one has confirmed thatI was talking abt ATAGS . A mobile version is also under development.
Dont know where this updates came from . One youtube channel had also reported .No one has confirmed that
155/52 SPH are inherently expensive, even PLAGF operates 300+ PLZ-05, 122mm SPH form the bulk of their inventory.K9s were procured for plains and deserts (western front). In 2020 we tried out K9s in Ladakh (there were multiple firing trials), and found out they are pretty good there as well, and given China's conventional superiority in Ladakh, made it a necessity to deploy them there.
ATAGS, (or any other towed artillery in the Indian Army) is expected to perform on both plains and the Himalayas. While I am aware of excessive trials of ATAGS and in no way giving a free pass to the Indian Army, it makes little sense to pick up every small matter and twist it to look like corruption.
Also, 300 K9s are utterly inadequate. We should be moving towards more SPH not towed artilleries. We need at least 500 to balance both Pakistan and China. But I guess we will see more emergency purchases when the hell breaks loose finally.
Then it makes no sense for a BEML trucked to be at Kalyani Group's plant.No one has confirmed that
Also doesn’t make sense not to mention it when being interviewed about their portfolioThen it makes no sense for a BEML trucked to be at Kalyani Group's plant.
How we gotWho said u bought
I guess it’s now confirmed. Bharat forge IS working on a MGS based on that BEML up-armoured truckThen it makes no sense for a BEML trucked to be at Kalyani Group's plant.
Abbu ko pese thodena dete haiHow we got
This is what I like about BF. They bet on future requirements now and start developing now.I guess it’s now confirmed. Bharat forge IS working on a MGS based on that BEML up-armoured truck
I coincidentally found this today on an entirely unrelated video.
So defence nerds- does that look like the ATAGS to you? Or is that BF’s own 155/52 gun?
also is this with direct collaboration with DRDO and BEML or something BF has taken it upon themselves to develop imagining future requirements (MGS is still outstanding)?
View attachment 173430