India should start planning or making research for guided missiles fired from tube artillery.
The first move was LAHAT on Arjun
Good info.
Good stuff.
Now if we have the stuff why were we planning to have LAHAT or this was developed after LAHAT was rejected for Arjun tank.
if you see the size of India Pakistan or their military one place seems to be worrying according to me the self propelled guns .
the http://www.globalfirepower.com/coun...ia&country2=Pakistan&Submit=Compare+Countries shows the following View attachment 14151
India has 290 self propelled guns whereas pakistan has 465
So Pakistan has a upper hand in mobilizing the guns fast because Pakistan has more self propelled guns than India whereas it has lesser military size and lesser area to defend
@Kunal Biswas Bro can this system be useful for shorter range pounding instead of 120mm mortarView attachment 14211
Bro TATA 713 is a small size truck..we need some thing like suv mounted like humvee for fast maneuvering...Cannot replace Mortars as mortars are used for steep attack where artillery or MBRLs are not viable ..
=========================================
I would say more useful over mountains on TATA 713 ..
I think this classification may have blurred if you considering range of M-46 and TulipCannot replace Mortars as mortars are used for steep attack where artillery or MBRLs are not viable ..
..
Bro TATA 713 is a small size truck..we need some thing like suv mounted like humvee for fast maneuvering...
35 mtr accuracy at 40km range is really good! I wonder how the radar and gun grid is laid out and what redundancies are built in.DRDO Scientist Explains How Swati Gun Locating Radar Helped Indian Army Destroy Pakistani Posts
Cost of 145 M777s =$ 885 million. Comes out to be approx. $ 6.1 million.Let's not be a jingoist Mr. Moderator. Please back this up by proofs and facts.
How is it better than M777? It definitely is a good gun but lightyears ahead? How exactly? Also, a lightyear is a unit of distance not time.
Normal base bleed shell range for M777 is 30km and 40km for ATAGS. ATAGS range is 133% more but weighs 300% more. M777 can be lifted by medium/heavy choppers and deployed in the most challenging terrains at a moment's notice.
Let's not be a jingoist Mr. Moderator. Please back this up by proofs and facts.
How is it better than M777? It definitely is a good gun but lightyears ahead? How exactly? Also, a lightyear is a unit of distance not time.
Normal base bleed shell range for M777 is 30km and 40km for ATAGS. ATAGS range is 133% more but weighs 300% more. M777 can be lifted by medium/heavy choppers and deployed in the most challenging terrains at a moment's notice.
Why are you trying to compare Oranges with apples?Let's not be a jingoist Mr. Moderator. Please back this up by proofs and facts.
How is it better than M777? It definitely is a good gun but lightyears ahead? How exactly? Also, a lightyear is a unit of distance not time.
Normal base bleed shell range for M777 is 30km and 40km for ATAGS. ATAGS range is 133% more but weighs 300% more. M777 can be lifted by medium/heavy choppers and deployed in the most challenging terrains at a moment's notice.
I agree that the accuracy is not good 35 m(some thing better than nothing) because it will be difficult to destroy the gun with 35m accuracy in location pulse some error in the gun firing.... so the chances of enemy artillery seem to be high.35 mtr accuracy at 40km range is really good! I wonder how the radar and gun grid is laid out and what redundancies are built in.