Sir this discussion will end up on Kashmir and I don't want to talk about kashmir here because indian members don't like it.this terrorism is not new.we can't stop people from fighting for kashmir.it is out of control.we can't control them.i can't explain further.you know the problems between India and Pakistan.
Sir, I appreciate that you answered but mislead the issue. to Timbuktu.
The question is about "sovereignty of a state" which we consider Pakistan to be, including for POK and GB.
India never said Pakistan does not exercise sovereignty over those areas. Indian position is that those areas belong to India. Indians do not violate the LC and carry out terrorist killings in POK and GB so far.
Pakistani consider J&K to be disputed. That is fine but that does not absolve Pakistan as a state from exercising sovereign rights over her citizens. That does not absolve Pakistan of the responsibility of following international code of conduct under laws for nations to be a responsible and accountable state.
India has the sovereign rights of "Defense". Any attack launched and organised from within Pakistan must be dealt with by Pakistani State failing which India will do that. That is what international law is.
Pakistanis love for Kashmir does not mean it is "Umma Ka Chumma" because there is no Umma which governs Pakistan. If it does exist independent of Pakistan, India will deal with that too.
OK, what is the guarantee that tomorrow Pakistanis will not develop love for Gujarat / Junagadh, then for Hyderabad, Saharanpur, Bareilly, Lucknow and then for Delhi like they have started bomb blasts there too.
Is there an end to it ?. Sensible Pakistanis say "No".
History does repeat the events, but not necessarily the outcome. India may also develop love for their old Multan, Lahore, Peshawar, Karachi etc. After all all those were India and Hindu not very far ago.
You strive for and want "Kayamat" not we in India. We only sing