India-Pakistan LoC/IB Skirmishes in the Aftermath of August 5 2019

[Atcjurvin]

...............................
Check out @ANI’s Tweet:

 

[Absolut_Vodka]

Got another PISSPIG Mujahideen

J&K: Police, Army and CRPF personnel arrested local terrorist Junaid Farooq Pandith of Hizbul Mujahideen. A trap was laid for him in Tapper Pattan in Baramulla district.

Why arrest them...cant we simply burn them!

Someone explain this jihadi chutiya who is fighting Hindu India while having pandit in his own name

Dhoobi ki kutta, an ghar ka na ghat ka.

 

[Deathstar]

Someone explain this jihadi chutiya who is fighting Hindu India while having pandit in his own name

Dhoobi ki kutta, an ghar ka na ghat ka.

Wani , butt , Pandith all these are Hindu surnames and cz of this identity crisis i.e not a pure Hindu nor a Muslim , they strive to exert their identity and to achieve this they become hardcore religious

 

[Blue Water Navy]

Wani , butt , Pandith all these are Hindu surnames and cz of this identity crisis i.e not a pure Hindu nor a Muslim , they strive to exert their identity and to achieve this they become hardcore religious

Exactly correct. Most of these jihadis don't even know what's written in Koran or go to a mosque. They just blindly follow the their leaders in the name of God.

 

[fire starter]

one can clearly see it's American helicopter why we are selling our self respect and sovereignty for just a crooks whom we don't believe.

 

[fire starter]

one can clearly see it's American helicopter why we are selling our self respect and dignity for such a crooks whom we don't believe.

 

[Assassin 2.0]

one can clearly see it's American helicopter why we are selling our self respect and sovereignty for just a crooks whom we don't believe.

In past it was done with collaboration with IAF. Non the less Modi ji have signed tons of billion $ things to appease trump this is part of that only. From over priced apache to what not.

 

[Shashank Nayak]

one can clearly see it's American helicopter why we are selling our self respect and sovereignty for just a crooks whom we don't believe.

Please... It was Modi who wanted to organize a road show and a circus at the world's biggest stadium...India never organized such lavish receptions, except maybe for King George V in British India..So Modi has to bend over backwards to Trump's security team... It will anyway work for whatsapp university BJP rural base, who would think that Trump is in thrall of Modi..

 

[fire starter]

Please... It was Modi who wanted to organize a road show and a circus at the world's biggest stadium...India never organized such lavish receptions, except maybe for King George V in British India..So Modi has to bend over backwards to Trump's security team... It will anyway work for whatsapp university BJP rural base, who would think that Trump is in thrall of Modi..

so we came at the level of porkistan now such a shame.......

 

[Deathstar]

Please... It was Modi who wanted to organize a road show and a circus at the world's biggest stadium...India never organized such lavish receptions, except maybe for King George V in British India..So Modi has to bend over backwards to Trump's security team... It will anyway work for whatsapp university BJP rural base, who would think that Trump is in thrall of Modi..

Its absolute humiliation. There wasnt any need to do this. Even after all this , he will bitch about India and propose mediation.
I dont like such policy of Modi ban. Have some self respect

 

[Absolut_Vodka]

In past it was done with collaboration with IAF. Non the less Modi ji have signed tons of billion $ things to appease trump this is part of that only. From over priced apache to what not.

I don't think it's a big deal IMHO. SS might have proprietary hardware on board while scanning the stadium that they dont want disclosed. Ditto for POTUS beast and accompanying cars having proprietary jammers and scanners.

When we get technologically ahead of US, we too will make our own arrangements.

 

[rone]

Guys it just low level heli recon for possible security assurance even this event happen in France this will happen so don't get too harsh on PM, yes our mil Helos are absent but it may be for scouting for other location , if Trump going to be public in this Munch large crowd out side USA these will be their base protocol's, am pretty Much sure it will be done with coordination with pur security forces also possibly the us heli may also have Indian counterpart's, becoz in case of emergency US can't pull out president with what man power currently deployed there

 

[Shashank Nayak]

Guys it just low level heli recon for possible security assurance even this event happen in France this will happen so don't get too harsh on PM, yes our mil Helos are absent but it may be for scouting for other location , if Trump going to be public in this Munch large crowd out side USA these will be their base protocol's, am pretty Much sure it will be done with coordination with pur security forces also possibly the us heli may also have Indian counterpart's, becoz in case of emergency US can't pull out president with what man power currently deployed there

It's not the helis that are the problem... It's this whole circus that Modi planned that is the problem... why be so dramatic....

 

[rone]

It's not the helis that are the problem... It's this whole circus that Modi planned that is the problem... why be so dramatic....

Its need of hour, becoz anti CAA loby so strong and we already have xtream Hindu sided gov labels so Trump vist and these kind of public show needed to put through our narrative, am pretty much sure it will be much more modi show than Trump show, becoz he knows if he can't bring back ppl on his side upa come power again and we all go back to our dark ages

 

[MIDKNIGHT FENERIR-00]

In past it was done with collaboration with IAF. Non the less Modi ji have signed tons of billion $ things to appease trump this is part of that only. From over priced apache to what not.

Keep Calm Bro it’s just a Helicopter. This is just a couple hour circus. It’s the secret service job to protect trump. If something happened to the fucker they might also blame us saying we didn’t let them use the airspace or something to protect orange man. Helicopter only patrols over route area not the entire city. The city is still indian. White Trash doesn’t own our land. I mean it was the khangressi who started this Cooperation Crap with the Americans in the first place under the nuclear deal shit and then military “cooperation” under GSOMIA, LEMOA and COMCASA shit. We just need to Wait and see. I don’t like this over the top Circus modi has planned but if this will increase his approval rating and people ‘s Support for him then I am all for it. This won’t be a trump show it will be a modi show just like Howdy modi.

 

[MIDKNIGHT FENERIR-00]

Its absolute humiliation. There wasnt any need to do this. Even after all this , he will bitch about India and propose mediation.
I dont like such policy of Modi ban. Have some self respect

I agree modi went overboard with all these Arrangements and events and shit but then again there many retards in India who worship trump as kind of fucking God and Kiss his fucking feet. Like WTF, People Across the World will see this and think we are a bunch of idiots. Trump is not the friend of India or Indians. One of his biggest supporters in the US are the Xtian Religious and Conversion lobby who wants Trump to use US assets and resources to help convert people to Xtianity in countries like India, Southeast Asia and Africa. India and Indians have no friends in this world. We Indians should stop with this gullible nature.

 

[indiatester]

Its absolute humiliation. There wasnt any need to do this. Even after all this , he will bitch about India and propose mediation.
I dont like such policy of Modi ban. Have some self respect

Considering the kinds of road shows PM Modi has had in US and other places, its but natural to reciprocate.
Anyway when Uncle is known to be susceptible to praise, pomp and ceremony, do it to get what we want.

 

[MIDKNIGHT FENERIR-00]

Someone explain this jihadi chutiya who is fighting Hindu India while having pandit in his own name

Dhoobi ki kutta, an ghar ka na ghat ka.

He is not a Hindu Anymore he is a Converted Camel Pee Drinker Dog Similar to the Pakjabi we must terminate them. Converted dogs have always been more dangerous than there Arab Masters themselves.

 

[MIDKNIGHT FENERIR-00]

OFF TOPIC

US-Taliban deal could leave Indian infra in Afghanistan vulnerable
Indrani Bagchi | TNN | Updated: Feb 22, 2020, 08:51 IST

TNN

For the past decade, Indian policymakers and security leadership have anticipated a withdrawal

of US troops from Afghanistan, and what that would mean for India. The world now has a date. On Friday, the US and Taliban, in coordinated statements, announced that the two sides would sign a peace agreement on February 29.

The peace deal is expected to kick off two processes — a phased withdrawal of US troops and an ‘intra-Afghan’ dialogue. The first test will be a “significant reduction in violence” across Afghanistan. “Intra-Afghan negotiations will start soon thereafter, and will build on this fundamental step to deliver a comprehensive and permanent ceasefire and the future political roadmap for Afghanistan. The only way to achieve a sustainable peace in Afghanistan is for Afghans to come together and agree on the way forward,” US secretary of state Mike Pompeo said.

Afghanistan and its future will now be an important element in the talks the Indian leadership will have with US President Donald Trump

and his cabinet next week. India will be interested in the timeline of US withdrawal as well as the details of a security/counter-terrorism presence the US may have in Afghanistan.

Tilak Devasher, formerly with RAW, said, “India’s interest is to secure the investments we have made in Afghanistan in the past two decades, and the security of our diplomats, personnel and missions. In addition, we would be wary of ungoverned spaces in that country, which could become grounds for terror groups to flourish. Of particular concern would be the prospect that Pakistan could use any such spaces to move its anti-India terror infrastructure, groups like LeT and JeM from Pakistan.”

In a sense, the peace deal could be a victory of sorts for Pakistan, which has been Taliban’s principal supporter for ever. Pakistan has been pressured by US to bring the Taliban to the negotiating table and prima facie, it has delivered. It is significant, therefore, that despite Pakistan’s importance in getting this deal together, it could not stay off the FATF grey list, which PM Imran Khan had desperately wanted.

Former ambassador to Afghanistan Gautam Mukhopadhyaya said, “For the sake of peace that Afghans desperately want after decades of war and terrorism, any opportunity for inter-Afghan talks should be welcomed and given a chance. But Afghans will be entering such talks with the US repositioned as a facilitator rather than strategic political and military partner, and neither the Afghans nor we should be under any illusions that the decks are stacked against it. The Afghans need all the political support from the international community.”

The Afghan election results were just made public after months, giving Ashraf Ghani another victory. The results have been rejected by opponent Abdullah Abdullah and others. Neither the US nor Pakistan have congratulated Ghani, only India and the EU have. It’s no secret that the Taliban does not consider the Kabul government to be legitimate.

This not only places Ghani and his government in an uncertain position, it could allow the Taliban to pick off the different groups and oust Ghani in the foreseeable future. In an oped, Sirajuddin Haqqani, deputy leader of the Taliban and head of the dreaded Haqqani Network, emphasised a “new Afghanistan”. The contours of that will be watched warily from India.

 

[MIDKNIGHT FENERIR-00]

OFF TOPIC
What We, the Taliban, Want​

I am convinced that the killing and the maiming must stop, the deputy leader of the Taliban writes.
By Sirajuddin Haqqani
Mr. Haqqani is the deputy leader of the Taliban.
Feb. 20, 2020

A man waving an Afghan flag during an Independence Day celebration in Kabul in 2019.Credit...Rafiq Maqbool/Associated Press

When our representatives started negotiating with the United States in 2018, our confidence that the talks would yield results was close to zero. We did not trust American intentions after 18 years of war and several previous attempts at negotiation that had proved futile.

Nevertheless, we decided to try once more. The long war has exacted a terrible cost from everyone. We thought it unwise to dismiss any potential opportunity for peace no matter how meager the prospects of its success. For more than four decades, precious Afghan lives have been lost every day. Everyone has lost somebody they loved. Everyone is tired of war. I am convinced that the killing and the maiming must stop.

We did not choose our war with the foreign coalition led by the United States. We were forced to defend ourselves. The withdrawal of foreign forces has been our first and foremost demand. That we today stand at the threshold of a peace agreement with the United States is no small milestone.

Our negotiation team, led by my colleagues Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar and Sher Mohammed Abas Stanekzai, has worked tirelessly for the past 18 months with the American negotiators to make an agreement possible. We stuck with the talks despite recurring disquiet and upset within our ranks over the intensified bombing campaign against our villages by the United States and the flip-flopping and ever-moving goal posts of the American side.

Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, second from left, with members of a Taliban delegation in Russia in 2019.Credit...Alexander Zemlianichenko/Associated Press

Even when President Trump called off the talks, we kept the door to peace open because we Afghans suffer the most from the continuation of the war. No peace agreement, following on the heels of such intensive talks, comes without mutual compromises. That we stuck with such turbulent talks with the enemy we have fought bitterly for two decades, even as death rained from the sky, testifies to our commitment to ending the hostilities and bringing peace to our country.

We are aware of the concerns and questions in and outside Afghanistan about the kind of government we would have after the foreign troops withdraw. My response to such concerns is that it will depend on a consensus among Afghans. We should not let our worries get in the way of a process of genuine discussion and deliberation free for the first time from foreign domination and interference.

It is important that no one front-loads this process with predetermined outcomes and preconditions. We are committed to working with other parties in a consultative manner of genuine respect to agree on a new, inclusive political system in which the voice of every Afghan is reflected and where no Afghan feels excluded.

I am confident that, liberated from foreign domination and interference, we together will find a way to build an Islamic system in which all Afghans have equal rights, where the rights of women that are granted by Islam — from the right to education to the right to work — are protected, and where merit is the basis for equal opportunity.

We are also aware of concerns about the potential of Afghanistan being used by disruptive groups to threaten regional and world security. But these concerns are inflated: Reports about foreign groups in Afghanistan are politically motivated exaggerations by the warmongering players on all sides of the war.

It is not in the interest of any Afghan to allow such groups to hijack our country and turn it into a battleground. We have already suffered enough from foreign interventions. We will take all measures in partnership with other Afghans to make sure the new Afghanistan is a bastion of stability and that nobody feels threatened on our soil.

We are conscious of the immense challenges ahead. Perhaps our biggest challenge is to ensure that various Afghan groups work hard and sincerely toward defining our common future. I am confident that it is possible. If we can reach an agreement with a foreign enemy, we must be able to resolve intra-Afghan disagreements through talks.

Another challenge will be keeping the international community interested and positively engaged during the transition to peace and after the withdrawal of foreign troops. The support of the international community will be crucial to stabilizing and developing Afghanistan.

We are ready to work on the basis of mutual respect with our international partners on long-term peace-building and reconstruction. After the United States withdraws its troops, it can play a constructive role in the postwar development and reconstruction of Afghanistan.

We acknowledge the importance of maintaining friendly relations with all countries and take their concerns seriously. Afghanistan cannot afford to live in isolation. The new Afghanistan will be a responsible member of the international community.

We will remain committed to all international conventions as long as they are compatible with Islamic principles. And we expect other countries to respect the sovereignty and stability of our country and consider it as a ground for cooperation rather than competition and conflict.

More immediately, there will be the challenge of putting into effect our agreement with the United States. A degree of trust has been built through our talks with the American negotiators in Doha, Qatar, but just as the United States does not trust us completely, we too are very far from fully trusting it.

We are about to sign an agreement with the United States and we are fully committed to carrying out its every single provision, in letter and spirit. Achieving the potential of the agreement, ensuring its success and earning lasting peace will depend on an equally scrupulous observance by the United States of each of its commitments. Only then can we have complete trust and lay the foundation for cooperation — or even a partnership — in the future.

My fellow Afghans will soon celebrate this historic agreement. Once it is entirely fulfilled, Afghans will see the departure of all foreign troops. As we arrive at this milestone, I believe it is not a distant dream that we will soon see the day when we will come together with all our Afghan brothers and sisters, start moving toward lasting peace and lay the foundation of a new Afghanistan.

We would then celebrate a new beginning that invites all our compatriots to return from their exile to our country — to our shared home where everybody would have the right to live with dignity, in peace.

Sirajuddin Haqqani is the deputy leader of the Taliban.

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of lettersto the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: [email protected].

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.